These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17603887)

  • 1. A comprehensive evaluation of SAM, the SAM R-package and a simple modification to improve its performance.
    Zhang S
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2007 Jun; 8():230. PubMed ID: 17603887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A note on using permutation-based false discovery rate estimates to compare different analysis methods for microarray data.
    Xie Y; Pan W; Khodursky AB
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Dec; 21(23):4280-8. PubMed ID: 16188930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. False discovery rate, sensitivity and sample size for microarray studies.
    Pawitan Y; Michiels S; Koscielny S; Gusnanto A; Ploner A
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Jul; 21(13):3017-24. PubMed ID: 15840707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. On correcting the overestimation of the permutation-based false discovery rate estimator.
    Jiao S; Zhang S
    Bioinformatics; 2008 Aug; 24(15):1655-61. PubMed ID: 18573796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Re-sampling strategy to improve the estimation of number of null hypotheses in FDR control under strong correlation structures.
    Lu X; Perkins DL
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2007 May; 8():157. PubMed ID: 17509157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A unified framework for finding differentially expressed genes from microarray experiments.
    Shaik JS; Yeasin M
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2007 Sep; 8():347. PubMed ID: 17877806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Multidimensional local false discovery rate for microarray studies.
    Ploner A; Calza S; Gusnanto A; Pawitan Y
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Mar; 22(5):556-65. PubMed ID: 16368770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A mixture model for estimating the local false discovery rate in DNA microarray analysis.
    Liao JG; Lin Y; Selvanayagam ZE; Shih WJ
    Bioinformatics; 2004 Nov; 20(16):2694-701. PubMed ID: 15145810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of dependence in high-dimensional multiple testing problems.
    Kim KI; van de Wiel MA
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Feb; 9():114. PubMed ID: 18298808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Significance analysis of microarray for relative quantitation of LC/MS data in proteomics.
    Roxas BA; Li Q
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Apr; 9():187. PubMed ID: 18402702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Identifying differentially expressed genes using false discovery rate controlling procedures.
    Reiner A; Yekutieli D; Benjamini Y
    Bioinformatics; 2003 Feb; 19(3):368-75. PubMed ID: 12584122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of seven methods for producing Affymetrix expression scores based on False Discovery Rates in disease profiling data.
    Shedden K; Chen W; Kuick R; Ghosh D; Macdonald J; Cho KR; Giordano TJ; Gruber SB; Fearon ER; Taylor JM; Hanash S
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Feb; 6():26. PubMed ID: 15705192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comments on the analysis of unbalanced microarray data.
    Kerr KF
    Bioinformatics; 2009 Aug; 25(16):2035-41. PubMed ID: 19528084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Construction of null statistics in permutation-based multiple testing for multi-factorial microarray experiments.
    Gao X
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Jun; 22(12):1486-94. PubMed ID: 16574697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An improved procedure for gene selection from microarray experiments using false discovery rate criterion.
    Yang JJ; Yang MC
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2006 Jan; 7():15. PubMed ID: 16405735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Practical FDR-based sample size calculations in microarray experiments.
    Hu J; Zou F; Wright FA
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Aug; 21(15):3264-72. PubMed ID: 15932903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Detecting differential expression in microarray data: comparison of optimal procedures.
    Perelman E; Ploner A; Calza S; Pawitan Y
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2007 Jan; 8():28. PubMed ID: 17257426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A practical false discovery rate approach to identifying patterns of differential expression in microarray data.
    Grant GR; Liu J; Stoeckert CJ
    Bioinformatics; 2005 Jun; 21(11):2684-90. PubMed ID: 15797908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Quick calculation for sample size while controlling false discovery rate with application to microarray analysis.
    Liu P; Hwang JT
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Mar; 23(6):739-46. PubMed ID: 17237060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The balance of reproducibility, sensitivity, and specificity of lists of differentially expressed genes in microarray studies.
    Shi L; Jones WD; Jensen RV; Harris SC; Perkins RG; Goodsaid FM; Guo L; Croner LJ; Boysen C; Fang H; Qian F; Amur S; Bao W; Barbacioru CC; Bertholet V; Cao XM; Chu TM; Collins PJ; Fan XH; Frueh FW; Fuscoe JC; Guo X; Han J; Herman D; Hong H; Kawasaki ES; Li QZ; Luo Y; Ma Y; Mei N; Peterson RL; Puri RK; Shippy R; Su Z; Sun YA; Sun H; Thorn B; Turpaz Y; Wang C; Wang SJ; Warrington JA; Willey JC; Wu J; Xie Q; Zhang L; Zhang L; Zhong S; Wolfinger RD; Tong W
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Aug; 9 Suppl 9(Suppl 9):S10. PubMed ID: 18793455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.