These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17603987)

  • 1. Gambles vs. quasi-realistic scenarios: expectations to find probability and risk-defusing information.
    Huber O; Huber OW
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Feb; 127(2):222-36. PubMed ID: 17603987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Justification pressure in risky decision making: search for risk defusing operators.
    Huber O; Bär AS; Huber OW
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2009 Jan; 130(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 18986637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of ambiguity and risk on decision making in mild Alzheimer's disease.
    Sinz H; Zamarian L; Benke T; Wenning GK; Delazer M
    Neuropsychologia; 2008; 46(7):2043-55. PubMed ID: 18339408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Normal aging affects decisions under ambiguity, but not decisions under risk.
    Zamarian L; Sinz H; Bonatti E; Gamboz N; Delazer M
    Neuropsychology; 2008 Sep; 22(5):645-57. PubMed ID: 18763884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Differences in risk-defusing behavior in deciding for oneself versus deciding for other people.
    Pollai M; Kirchler E
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 Jan; 139(1):239-43. PubMed ID: 22018657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Preference reversals are diminished when gambles are presented as relative frequencies.
    Tunney RJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2006 Sep; 59(9):1516-23. PubMed ID: 16873105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. When does information about probability count in choices under risk?
    Tyszka T; Zaleskiewicz T
    Risk Anal; 2006 Dec; 26(6):1623-36. PubMed ID: 17184402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Exaggerated risk: prospect theory and probability weighting in risky choice.
    Kusev P; van Schaik P; Ayton P; Dent J; Chater N
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Nov; 35(6):1487-505. PubMed ID: 19857019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Decision making in ambiguous and risky situations after unilateral temporal lobe epilepsy surgery.
    Bonatti E; Kuchukhidze G; Zamarian L; Trinka E; Bodner T; Benke T; Delazer M
    Epilepsy Behav; 2009 Apr; 14(4):665-73. PubMed ID: 19233314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Affective and deliberative processes in risky choice: age differences in risk taking in the Columbia Card Task.
    Figner B; Mackinlay RJ; Wilkening F; Weber EU
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 May; 35(3):709-30. PubMed ID: 19379045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On the composition of risk preference and belief.
    Wakkar PP
    Psychol Rev; 2004 Jan; 111(1):236-41. PubMed ID: 14756595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Inferences under time pressure: how opportunity costs affect strategy selection.
    Rieskamp J; Hoffrage U
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Feb; 127(2):258-76. PubMed ID: 17640605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Executive functions and risky decision-making in patients with opiate dependence.
    Brand M; Roth-Bauer M; Driessen M; Markowitsch HJ
    Drug Alcohol Depend; 2008 Sep; 97(1-2):64-72. PubMed ID: 18485620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Decision making and learning while taking sequential risks.
    Pleskac TJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Jan; 34(1):167-85. PubMed ID: 18194061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Concurrent performance in a three-alternative choice situation: response allocation in a Rock/Paper/Scissors game.
    Kangas BD; Berry MS; Cassidy RN; Dallery J; Vaidya M; Hackenberg TD
    Behav Processes; 2009 Oct; 82(2):164-72. PubMed ID: 19555744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Decision making and risk attitude of the common marmoset in a gambling task.
    Tokuno H; Tanaka I
    Neurosci Res; 2011 Nov; 71(3):260-5. PubMed ID: 21802456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The format in which uncertainty information is presented affects decision biases.
    Gottlieb DA; Weiss T; Chapman GB
    Psychol Sci; 2007 Mar; 18(3):240-6. PubMed ID: 17444921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Banking on a bad bet. Probability matching in risky choice is linked to expectation generation.
    James G; Koehler DJ
    Psychol Sci; 2011 Jun; 22(6):707-11. PubMed ID: 21551340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Feedback produces divergence from prospect theory in descriptive choice.
    Jessup RK; Bishara AJ; Busemeyer JR
    Psychol Sci; 2008 Oct; 19(10):1015-22. PubMed ID: 19000212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Probability Distortion Depends on Choice Sequence in Rhesus Monkeys.
    Ferrari-Toniolo S; Bujold PM; Schultz W
    J Neurosci; 2019 Apr; 39(15):2915-2929. PubMed ID: 30705103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.