120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17604930)
1. Depiction of normal gastrointestinal anatomy with MDCT: comparison of low- and high-attenuation oral contrast media.
Erturk SM; Mortelé KJ; Oliva MR; Ichikawa T; Silverman SG; Cantisani V; Pagliara E; Ros PR
Eur J Radiol; 2008 Apr; 66(1):84-7. PubMed ID: 17604930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Re: depiction of normal gastrointestinal anatomy with MDCT: comparison of low- and high-attenuation oral contrast media.
Kennish SJ; Tolan DJ
Eur J Radiol; 2008 Sep; 67(3):551; author reply 551. PubMed ID: 18684579
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Gastrointestinal tract wall visualization and distention during abdominal and pelvic multidetector CT with a neutral barium sulphate suspension: comparison with positive barium sulphate suspension and with water.
Oliva MR; Erturk SM; Ichikawa T; Rocha T; Ros PR; Silverman SG; Mortele KJ
JBR-BTR; 2012; 95(4):237-42. PubMed ID: 23019990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of bowel distention and bowel wall appearance by using neutral oral contrast agent for multi-detector row CT.
Megibow AJ; Babb JS; Hecht EM; Cho JJ; Houston C; Boruch MM; Williams AB
Radiology; 2006 Jan; 238(1):87-95. PubMed ID: 16293806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Water as a contrast medium: a re-evaluation using the multidetector-row computed tomography.
Makarawo TP; Negussie E; Malde S; Tilak J; Gayagoy J; Watson J; Francis F; Lincoln D; Jacobs MJ
Am Surg; 2013 Jul; 79(7):728-33. PubMed ID: 23816008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cost-effectiveness and patient tolerance of low-attenuation oral contrast material: milk versus VoLumen.
Koo CW; Shah-Patel LR; Baer JW; Frager DH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 May; 190(5):1307-13. PubMed ID: 18430848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of low-density neutral oral contrast material in PET/CT for tumor imaging: results of a randomized clinical trial.
Otero HJ; Yap JT; Patak MA; Erturk SM; Israel DA; Johnston CJ; Sakellis C; Rybicki FJ; Van den Abbeele AD; Ros PR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Aug; 193(2):326-32. PubMed ID: 19620427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. MR imaging of the gastrointestinal tract with i.v., gadolinium and diluted barium oral contrast media compared with unenhanced MR imaging and CT.
Low RN; Francis IR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Oct; 169(4):1051-9. PubMed ID: 9308464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evaluation of bowel distension and bowel wall visualization according to patient positions during administration of oral contrast media for CT enterography.
Lee SB; Kim SH; Son JH; Baik JY
Br J Radiol; 2017 Dec; 90(1080):20170352. PubMed ID: 28972790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Abdominal helical CT: milk as a low-attenuation oral contrast agent.
Thompson SE; Raptopoulos V; Sheiman RL; McNicholas MM; Prassopoulos P
Radiology; 1999 Jun; 211(3):870-5. PubMed ID: 10352618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Prospective randomized trial of iohexol 350 versus meglumine sodium diatrizoate as an oral contrast agent for abdominopelvic computed tomography.
Peterson CM; Lin M; Pilgram T; Heiken JP
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2011; 35(2):202-5. PubMed ID: 21412090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Active Crohn disease: CT findings and interobserver agreement for enteric phase CT enterography.
Booya F; Fletcher JG; Huprich JE; Barlow JM; Johnson CD; Fidler JL; Solem CA; Sandborn WJ; Loftus EV; Harmsen WS
Radiology; 2006 Dec; 241(3):787-95. PubMed ID: 17032911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Oral contrast for abdominal computed tomography in children: the effects on gastric fluid volume.
Mahmoud M; McAuliffe J; Kim HY; Mishra P; Salisbury S; Schnell B; Hirsch P; Arbabi S; Donnelly LF
Anesth Analg; 2010 Nov; 111(5):1252-8. PubMed ID: 20736428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Gastrointestinal tract labeling for MDCT of abdomen: comparison of low density barium and low density barium in combination with water.
Gulati K; Shah ZK; Sainani N; Uppot R; Sahani DV
Eur Radiol; 2008 May; 18(5):868-73. PubMed ID: 18183403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Low-attenuation oral GI contrast agents in abdominal-pelvic computed tomography.
Hebert JJ; Taylor AJ; Winter TC; Reichelderfer M; Weichert JP
Abdom Imaging; 2006; 31(1):48-53. PubMed ID: 16252139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of neutral and positive enteral contrast media for MDCT enteroclysis.
Aiyappan SK; Kalra N; Sandhu MS; Kochhar R; Wig JD; Khandelwal N
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Mar; 81(3):406-10. PubMed ID: 21239131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cerebral CT Venography Using a 320-MDCT Scanner With a Time-Density Curve Technique and Low Volume of Contrast Agent: Comparison With Fixed Time-Delay Technique.
Biswas S; Chandran A; Roughley S; Bhojak M; Das K
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Dec; 205(6):1269-75. PubMed ID: 26587933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Capability of abdominal 320-detector row CT for small vasculature assessment compared with that of 64-detector row CT.
Kitajima K; Maeda T; Ohno Y; Yoshikawa T; Konishi M; Kanda T; Onishi Y; Matsumoto K; Koyama H; Takenaka D; Sugimura K
Eur J Radiol; 2011 Nov; 80(2):219-23. PubMed ID: 20579828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Oral administration of intravenous contrast media: a tasty alternative to conventional oral contrast media in computed tomography].
Diederichs G; Franiel T; Asbach P; Romano V; Hamm B; Rogalla P
Rofo; 2007 Oct; 179(10):1061-7. PubMed ID: 17786895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of an experimental low-attenuation gastrointestinal contrast agent for CT imaging of intestinal ischemia in an animal model.
Spilde JM; Lee FT; Chosy SG; Krupinski EA; Kuhlman JE; Yandow DR
Acad Radiol; 1999 Feb; 6(2):94-101. PubMed ID: 12680431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
