These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

158 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17605353)

  • 1. Improving auditory steady-state response detection using independent component analysis on multichannel EEG data.
    Van Dun B; Wouters J; Moonen M
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 Jul; 54(7):1220-30. PubMed ID: 17605353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Optimal electrode selection for multi-channel electroencephalogram based detection of auditory steady-state responses.
    Van Dun B; Wouters J; Moonen M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jul; 126(1):254-68. PubMed ID: 19603882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A flexible research platform for multi-channel auditory steady-state response measurements.
    Van Dun B; Verstraeten S; Alaerts J; Luts H; Moonen M; Wouters J
    J Neurosci Methods; 2008 Mar; 169(1):239-48. PubMed ID: 18215424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of auditory steady-state responses and auditory brainstem responses in audiometric assessment of adults with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Lin YH; Ho HC; Wu HP
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 2009 Apr; 36(2):140-5. PubMed ID: 18620826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sorted averaging improves quality of auditory steady-state responses.
    Rahne T; Verhey JL; Mühler R
    J Neurosci Methods; 2013 May; 216(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 23603663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The influence of the detection paradigm in recording auditory steady-state responses.
    Luts H; Van Dun B; Alaerts J; Wouters J
    Ear Hear; 2008 Aug; 29(4):638-50. PubMed ID: 18469712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Auditory evoked potentials for the assessment of depth of anaesthesia: different configurations of artefact detection algorithms.
    Luecke D; Stockmanns G; Gallinat M; Kochs EF; Schneider G
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2007 Feb; 52(1):90-5. PubMed ID: 17313341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Independent component approach to the analysis of EEG and MEG recordings.
    Vigário R; Särelä J; Jousmäki V; Hämäläinen M; Oja E
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2000 May; 47(5):589-93. PubMed ID: 10851802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Enhancing the signal-to-noise ratio of ICA-based extracted ERPs.
    Lemm S; Curio G; Hlushchuk Y; Müller KR
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Apr; 53(4):601-7. PubMed ID: 16602566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Removal of ballistocardiogram artifacts from simultaneously recorded EEG and fMRI data using independent component analysis.
    Nakamura W; Anami K; Mori T; Saitoh O; Cichocki A; Amari S
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Jul; 53(7):1294-308. PubMed ID: 16830934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Principal component analysis as a method to facilitate fast detection of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions.
    Ravazzani P; Tognola G; Parazzini M; Grandori F
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2003 Feb; 50(2):249-52. PubMed ID: 12665039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. An integrated auditory-comprehension process augmented through topographical maps and a new eigensystem study.
    Cabrerizo M; Adjouadi M; Nunez K; Yaylali I; Jayakar P
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 2004; 40():187-92. PubMed ID: 15133956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Recording human evoked potentials that follow the pitch contour of a natural vowel.
    Dajani HR; Purcell D; Wong W; Kunov H; Picton TW
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2005 Sep; 52(9):1614-8. PubMed ID: 16189976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A matrix-based algorithm for estimating multiple coherence of a periodic signal and its application to the multichannel EEG during sensory stimulation.
    Miranda de Sá AM; Felix LB; Infantosi AF
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2004 Jul; 51(7):1140-6. PubMed ID: 15248530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Audiometric thresholds estimated by auditory steady-state responses. Influence of EEG amplitude and test duration on accuracy].
    Mühler R; Rahne T
    HNO; 2009 Jan; 57(1):44-50. PubMed ID: 19093093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Phase stability analysis of chirp evoked auditory brainstem responses by Gabor frame operators.
    Corona-Strauss FI; Delb W; Schick B; Strauss DJ
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2009 Dec; 17(6):530-6. PubMed ID: 19775985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparing a template approach and complex bandpass filtering for single-trial analysis of auditory evoked M100.
    Link A; Burghoff M; Salajegheh A; Poeppel D; Trahms L; Elster C
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2007 Feb; 52(1):106-10. PubMed ID: 17313344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Source localization of event-related potentials incorporating spatial notch filters.
    Spyrou L; Sanei S
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2008 Sep; 55(9):2232-9. PubMed ID: 18713692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Latency analysis of single auditory evoked M100 responses by spatio-temporal filtering.
    Wübbeler G; Link A; Burghoff M; Trahms L; Elster C
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Aug; 52(15):4383-92. PubMed ID: 17634639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Recording and online analysis of auditory steady state responses (ASSR) in Matlab.
    Bahmer A; Baumann U
    J Neurosci Methods; 2010 Mar; 187(1):105-13. PubMed ID: 20036283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.