183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17605356)
1. Force application during cochlear implant insertion: an analysis for improvement of surgeon technique.
Todd CA; Naghdy F; Svehla MJ
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 Jul; 54(7):1247-55. PubMed ID: 17605356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Modiolar coiling, electrical thresholds, and speech perception after cochlear implantation using the nucleus contour advance electrode with the advance off stylet technique.
Huang TC; Reitzen SD; Marrinan MS; Waltzman SB; Roland JT
Otol Neurotol; 2006 Feb; 27(2):159-66. PubMed ID: 16436984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Evaluation of the insertion-trauma of the Nucleus Contour Advance electrode-array in a human temporal bone model].
Klenzner T; Richter B; Nagursky H; Schipper J; Laszig R; Aschendorff A
Laryngorhinootologie; 2004 Dec; 83(12):840-4. PubMed ID: 15611904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A model for cochlear implant electrode insertion and force evaluation: results with a new electrode design and insertion technique.
Roland JT
Laryngoscope; 2005 Aug; 115(8):1325-39. PubMed ID: 16094101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Impact of the insertion speed of cochlear implant electrodes on the insertion forces.
Kontorinis G; Lenarz T; Stöver T; Paasche G
Otol Neurotol; 2011 Jun; 32(4):565-70. PubMed ID: 21478788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of different lubricants on cochlear implant electrode insertion forces.
Kontorinis G; Paasche G; Lenarz T; Stöver T
Otol Neurotol; 2011 Sep; 32(7):1050-6. PubMed ID: 21512420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Combining perimodiolar electrode placement and atraumatic insertion properties in cochlear implantation -- fact or fantasy?
Adunka OF; Pillsbury HC; Kiefer J
Acta Otolaryngol; 2006 May; 126(5):475-82. PubMed ID: 16698696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Nucleus Contour electrode array: a radiological and histological study.
Richter B; Aschendorff A; Lohnstein P; Husstedt H; Nagursky H; Laszig R
Laryngoscope; 2001 Mar; 111(3):508-14. PubMed ID: 11224784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quality control after insertion of the nucleus contour and contour advance electrode in adults.
Aschendorff A; Kromeier J; Klenzner T; Laszig R
Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2 Suppl):75S-79S. PubMed ID: 17496653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Friction force measurement during cochlear implant insertion: application to a force-controlled insertion tool design.
Miroir M; Nguyen Y; Kazmitcheff G; Ferrary E; Sterkers O; Grayeli AB
Otol Neurotol; 2012 Aug; 33(6):1092-100. PubMed ID: 22772019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of electrode insertion depth on intracochlear trauma.
Adunka O; Kiefer J
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2006 Sep; 135(3):374-82. PubMed ID: 16949967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Multichannel cochlear implantation in the scala vestibuli.
Lin K; Marrinan MS; Waltzman SB; Roland JT
Otol Neurotol; 2006 Aug; 27(5):634-8. PubMed ID: 16788421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses in adults and children: effects of lateral to medial placement of the nucleus 24 contour electrode array.
Runge-Samuelson C; Firszt JB; Gaggl W; Wackym PA
Otol Neurotol; 2009 Jun; 30(4):464-70. PubMed ID: 19300297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The nucleus contour electrode array: an electrophysiological study.
Pasanisi E; Vincenti V; Bacciu A; Guida M; Bacciu S
Laryngoscope; 2002 Sep; 112(9):1653-6. PubMed ID: 12352681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Electrode interaction in cochlear implant recipients: comparison of straight and contour electrode arrays.
Xi X; Ji F; Han D; Hong M; Chen A
ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2009; 71(4):228-37. PubMed ID: 19707042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. In vitro modifications of the scala tympani environment and the cochlear implant array surface.
Kontorinis G; Scheper V; Wissel K; Stöver T; Lenarz T; Paasche G
Laryngoscope; 2012 Sep; 122(9):2057-63. PubMed ID: 22648595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Variance of angular insertion depths in free-fitting and perimodiolar cochlear implant electrodes.
Radeloff A; Mack M; Baghi M; Gstoettner WK; Adunka OF
Otol Neurotol; 2008 Feb; 29(2):131-6. PubMed ID: 18090204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A coated electrode carrier for cochlear implantation reduces insertion forces.
Radeloff A; Unkelbach MH; Mack MG; Settevendemie C; Helbig S; Mueller J; Hagen R; Mlynski R
Laryngoscope; 2009 May; 119(5):959-63. PubMed ID: 19358253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Determination of frictional conditions between electrode array and endosteum lining for use in cochlear implant models.
Kha HN; Chen BK
J Biomech; 2006; 39(9):1752-6. PubMed ID: 15982662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of an electrode prototype for atraumatic cochlear implantation in hearing preservation candidates: preliminary results from a temporal bone study.
Helbig S; Settevendemie C; Mack M; Baumann U; Helbig M; Stöver T
Otol Neurotol; 2011 Apr; 32(3):419-23. PubMed ID: 21307807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
