119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17605395)
1. The development of a model for in vitro testing of femoral stems in impaction bone grafting.
Heal JS; Gozzard C; Gheduzzi S; Grimm B; Learmonth ID; Miles AW
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2007 May; 221(4):377-84. PubMed ID: 17605395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In-vitro study of medial strain distribution in the femur during impaction grafting.
Mak SY; Holsgrove TP; Miles AW
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2007 Aug; 221(6):613-9. PubMed ID: 17937200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Structural characteristics of impaction allografting for revision total hip arthroplasty.
Robinson MC; Fernlund G; Dominic Meek RM; Masri BA; Duncan CP; Oxland TR
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2005 Oct; 20(8):853-5. PubMed ID: 16023774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of the addition of hydroxyapatite graft substitutes upon the hoop strain and subsequent subsidence of a femoral model during impaction bone grafting.
McNamara IR; Rayment A; Brooks R; Best S; Rushton N
J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2012 Jan; 5(1):238-46. PubMed ID: 22100099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The compression-rotation stem: an experimental study on the primary stability of a new revision hip stem.
Kraenzlein J; Mazoochian F; Fottner A; Birkenmaier C; von Schulze Pellengahr C; Jansson V
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2009 Jan; 223(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 19239066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A laboratory simulation for morselized bone graft fusion: apparent modulus under operatively based femoral impaction kinetics.
Heiner AD; Callaghan JJ; Brown TD
J Biomech; 2005 Apr; 38(4):811-8. PubMed ID: 15713302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A hydroxyapatite graft substitute reduces subsidence in a femoral impaction grafting model.
Munro NA; Downing MR; Meakin JR; Lee AJ; Ashcroft GP
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2007 Feb; 455():246-52. PubMed ID: 16967033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A preclinical study of stem subsidence and graft incorporation after femoral impaction grafting using porous hydroxyapatite as a bone graft extender.
Howie DW; McGee MA; Callary SA; Carbone A; Stamenkov RB; Bruce WJ; Findlay DM
J Arthroplasty; 2011 Oct; 26(7):1050-6. PubMed ID: 21802252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Tricalcium-phosphate and hydroxyapatite bone-graft extender for use in impaction grafting revision surgery. An in vitro study on human femora.
van Haaren EH; Smit TH; Phipps K; Wuisman PI; Blunn G; Heyligers IC
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2005 Feb; 87(2):267-71. PubMed ID: 15736755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reconstruction of femoral defects in revision hip surgery: risk of fracture and stem migration after impaction bone grafting.
Barker R; Takahashi T; Toms A; Gregson P; Kuiper JH
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2006 Jun; 88(6):832-6. PubMed ID: 16720783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Should thorough Debridement be used in Fibular Allograft with impaction bone grafting to treat Femoral Head Necrosis: a biomechanical evaluation.
Zhou G; Zhang Y; Zeng L; He W; Pang Z; Chen X; Xu Y; Stephen LS; Chen L
BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2015 Jun; 16():140. PubMed ID: 26059456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Vibration-assisted bone-graft compaction in impaction bone grafting of the femur.
Bolland BJ; New AM; Madabhushi SP; Oreffo RO; Dunlop DG
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2007 May; 89(5):686-92. PubMed ID: 17540758
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Factors affecting the cohesion of impaction bone graft.
Oakley J; Kuiper JH
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2006 Jun; 88(6):828-31. PubMed ID: 16720782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Femoral component revision with use of impaction bone-grafting and a cemented polished stem. Surgical technique.
Schreurs BW; Arts JJ; Verdonschot N; Buma P; Slooff TJ; Gardeniers JW
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2006 Sep; 88 Suppl 1 Pt 2():259-74. PubMed ID: 16951098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impaction bone grafting with hydroxyapatite: increased femoral component stability in experiments using Sawbones.
Fujishiro T; Nishikawa T; Niikura T; Takikawa S; Nishiyama T; Mizuno K; Yoshiya S; Kurosaka M
Acta Orthop; 2005 Aug; 76(4):550-4. PubMed ID: 16195073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Femoral component revision with use of impaction bone-grafting and a cemented polished stem.
Schreurs BW; Arts JJ; Verdonschot N; Buma P; Slooff TJ; Gardeniers JW
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2005 Nov; 87(11):2499-507. PubMed ID: 16264127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Morsellised sawbones is an acceptable experimental substitute for the in vitro elastic and viscoelastic mechanical characterisation of morsellised cancellous bone undergoing impaction grafting.
Ayers MP; Clift SE; Gheduzzi S
Med Eng Phys; 2014 Jan; 36(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 24075067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Adjuvant therapies of bone graft around non-cemented experimental orthopedic implants stereological methods and experiments in dogs.
Baas J
Acta Orthop Suppl; 2008 Aug; 79(330):1-43. PubMed ID: 19065776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impaction bone grafting: a laboratory comparison of two methods.
Putzer D; Mayr E; Haid C; Reinthaler A; Nogler M
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2011 Aug; 93(8):1049-53. PubMed ID: 21768627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of the viscoelastic properties of bone grafts.
Datta A; Gheduzzi S; Miles AW
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Aug; 21(7):761-6. PubMed ID: 16713046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
