119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17605395)
21. Proximal femoral reconstruction with impaction bone grafting and circumferential metal mesh.
Takigami I; Otsuka H; Yamamoto K; Iwase T; Fujita H; Matsuda S; Akiyama H
J Orthop Sci; 2015 Mar; 20(2):331-9. PubMed ID: 25410982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The role of vibration and drainage in femoral impaction bone grafting.
Bolland BJ; New AM; Madabhushi G; Oreffo RO; Dunlop DG
J Arthroplasty; 2008 Dec; 23(8):1157-64. PubMed ID: 18534472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The use of bone-graft substitutes in large bone defects: any specific needs?
Calori GM; Mazza E; Colombo M; Ripamonti C
Injury; 2011 Sep; 42 Suppl 2():S56-63. PubMed ID: 21752369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Femoral head stresses following cortical bone grafting for aseptic necrosis. A finite element study.
Penix AR; Cook SD; Skinner HB; Weinstein AM; Haddad RJ
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1983 Mar; (173):159-65. PubMed ID: 6337757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Cancellous impaction grafting in femoral revision THA.
Padgett DE; Kinkel S
Orthopedics; 2011 Sep; 34(9):e482-4. PubMed ID: 21902138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Bone allograft and implant fixation tested under influence of bio-burden reduction, periosteal augmentation and topical antibiotics. Animal experimental studies.
Barckman J
Dan Med J; 2014 Jan; 61(1):B4720. PubMed ID: 24393592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Femoral stem impaction grafting: extending the role of cement.
Gehrke T; Gebauer M; Kendoff D
Bone Joint J; 2013 Nov; 95-B(11 Suppl A):92-4. PubMed ID: 24187362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Impaction grafting with a bone-graft substitute in a sheep model of revision hip replacement.
Coathup M; Smith N; Kingsley C; Buckland T; Dattani R; Ascroft GP; Blunn G
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2008 Feb; 90(2):246-53. PubMed ID: 18256099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A physical model for simulating fusion of impaction-grafted morselized cancellous bone.
Heiner AD; Brown TD
J Biomech; 2001 Jun; 34(6):811-4. PubMed ID: 11470120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Cemented versus cementless revision femoral stems using morselized allograft--a prospective, randomized study with 5 years follow-up].
Nesse E; Nielsen EW; Bastian D
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2003; 141(6):678-83. PubMed ID: 14679434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Injectable synthetic bone graft substitute combined with core decompression in the treatment of advanced osteonecrosis of the femoral head: A 5-year follow-up.
Yu PA; Peng KT; Huang TW; Hsu RW; Hsu WH; Lee MS
Biomed J; 2015; 38(3):257-61. PubMed ID: 25179724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Changes in strain distribution of loaded proximal femora caused by different types of cementless femoral stems.
Decking R; Puhl W; Simon U; Claes LE
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Jun; 21(5):495-501. PubMed ID: 16457913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A measurement of proximal femur strain with total hip arthroplasty.
Crowninshield RD; Pedersen DR; Brand RA
J Biomech Eng; 1980 Aug; 102(3):230. PubMed ID: 19530805
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Difference in femoral head and neck material properties between osteoarthritis and osteoporosis.
Sun SS; Ma HL; Liu CL; Huang CH; Cheng CK; Wei HW
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2008; 23 Suppl 1():S39-47. PubMed ID: 18187243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Preliminary report of impaction grafting for exchange femoral arthroplasty.
Elting JJ; Mikhail WE; Zicat BA; Hubbell JC; Lane LE; House B
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1995 Oct; (319):159-67. PubMed ID: 7554625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Biomechanical analysis of a synthetic, biodegradable impaction graft substitute.
Lutton C; Wheatley D; Wilson L; Van der Velden W; Crawford R; Goss B
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2010 Nov; 95(2):381-7. PubMed ID: 20632400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The effect of acetabular cup size on the short-term stability of revision hip arthroplasty: a finite element investigation.
Phillips AT; Pankaj ; Usmani AS; Howie CR
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2004; 218(4):239-49. PubMed ID: 15376726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Influence on load transfer of different femoral neck endoprostheses].
Steinhauser E; Ellenrieder M; Gruber G; Busch R; Gradinger R; Mittelmeier W
Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2006; 144(4):386-93. PubMed ID: 16941296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. On the applicability of bovine morsellized cortico-cancellous bone as a substitute for human morsellized cortico-cancellous bone for in vitro mechanical testing.
Lunde KB; Foss OA; Skallerud B
J Biomech; 2008 Dec; 41(16):3469-74. PubMed ID: 18995858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Impaction bone-grafting increases the holding power of cancellous screws in the femoral head. A pull-out study in human cadaver hips.
Lenzner A; Kaur I; Haviko T; Sõgel V; Gapejeva J; Ereline J; Pääsuke M
Acta Orthop Scand; 1999 Feb; 70(1):25-8. PubMed ID: 10191743
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
