These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17605492)

  • 1. Thin-plate spline analysis of craniofacial growth in Class I and Class II subjects.
    Franchi L; Baccetti T; Stahl F; McNamara JA
    Angle Orthod; 2007 Jul; 77(4):595-601. PubMed ID: 17605492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Longitudinal growth changes in untreated subjects with Class II Division 1 malocclusion.
    Stahl F; Baccetti T; Franchi L; McNamara JA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Jul; 134(1):125-37. PubMed ID: 18617112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dentofacial growth changes in subjects with untreated Class II malocclusion from late puberty through young adulthood.
    Baccetti T; Stahl F; McNamara JA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Feb; 135(2):148-54. PubMed ID: 19201320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of craniofacial growth of untreated Class I and Class II girls from ages 9 to 18 years: a longitudinal study.
    Yoon SS; Chung CH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Feb; 147(2):190-6. PubMed ID: 25636552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Semilongitudinal cephalometric study of craniofacial growth in untreated Class III malocclusion.
    Alexander AE; McNamara JA; Franchi L; Baccetti T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jun; 135(6):700.e1-14; discussion 700-1. PubMed ID: 19524825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dentofacial features of Class II malocclusion associated with maxillary skeletal protrusion: a longitudinal study at the circumpubertal growth period.
    Vásquez MJ; Baccetti T; Franchi L; McNamara JA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 May; 135(5):568.e1-7; discussion 568-9. PubMed ID: 19409335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Midfacial and mandibular morphometry of children with Class II and Class III malocclusions.
    Chang HP; Lin HC; Liu PH; Chang CH
    J Oral Rehabil; 2005 Sep; 32(9):642-7. PubMed ID: 16102076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of distal and neutral craniofacial pattern in untreated subjects in terms of skeletal harmony and growth.
    Gesch D
    Ann Anat; 1999 Jan; 181(1):15-8. PubMed ID: 10081552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Class II malocclusion with maxillary protrusion from the deciduous through the mixed dentition: a longitudinal study.
    Antonini A; Marinelli A; Baroni G; Franchi L; Defraia E
    Angle Orthod; 2005 Nov; 75(6):980-6. PubMed ID: 16448241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Morphology and growth in convex profile facial patterns: a longitudinal study.
    Karlsen AT; Krogstad O
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Aug; 69(4):334-44. PubMed ID: 10456601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An evaluation of growth and stability in untreated and treated subjects.
    Driscoll-Gilliland J; Buschang PH; Behrents RG
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Dec; 120(6):588-97. PubMed ID: 11742303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Age-related changes in sagittal relationship between the maxilla and mandible.
    Lux CJ; Burden D; Conradt C; Komposch G
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Dec; 27(6):568-78. PubMed ID: 16093257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [The facial growth of 300 subjects with Angle Class II division 1 malocclusion].
    Aknin JJ
    Orthod Fr; 1988; 59 Pt 2():459-75. PubMed ID: 3271966
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Changes in dentofacial structures in untreated Class II division 1 and normal subjects: a longitudinal study.
    Bishara SE; Jakobsen JR; Vorhies B; Bayati P
    Angle Orthod; 1997; 67(1):55-66. PubMed ID: 9046400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cephalometric evaluation of Class II malocclusions in transitional dentition.
    Kapoor S; Kapoor DN; Jaiswal JN
    J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent; 2001 Dec; 19(4):127-33. PubMed ID: 12396087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Morphometric analysis of the transverse dentoskeletal features of class II malocclusion in the mixed dentition.
    Alarashi M; Franchi L; Marinelli A; Defraia E
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Feb; 73(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 12607851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A longitudinal 3-dimensional size and shape comparison of untreated Class I and Class II subjects.
    Palomo JM; Hunt DW; Hans MG; Broadbent BH
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 May; 127(5):584-91. PubMed ID: 15877039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of differential growth and orthodontic treatment outcome by regional cephalometric superpositions.
    Efstratiadis SS; Cohen G; Ghafari J
    Angle Orthod; 1999 Jun; 69(3):225-30. PubMed ID: 10371427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cephalometric evaluation of nongrowing females with skeletal and dental Class II, division 1 malocclusion.
    Sayin MO; Türkkahraman H
    Angle Orthod; 2005 Jul; 75(4):656-60. PubMed ID: 16097237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of early activator treatment in patients with class II malocclusion evaluated by thin-plate spline analysis.
    Lux CJ; Rübel J; Starke J; Conradt C; Stellzig PA; Komposch PG
    Angle Orthod; 2001 Apr; 71(2):120-6. PubMed ID: 11302588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.