457 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17605818)
21. Interaction graph mining for protein complexes using local clique merging.
Li XL; Tan SH; Foo CS; Ng SK
Genome Inform; 2005; 16(2):260-9. PubMed ID: 16901108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Global map of SUMO function revealed by protein-protein interaction and genetic networks.
Makhnevych T; Sydorskyy Y; Xin X; Srikumar T; Vizeacoumar FJ; Jeram SM; Li Z; Bahr S; Andrews BJ; Boone C; Raught B
Mol Cell; 2009 Jan; 33(1):124-35. PubMed ID: 19150434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Gaining confidence in high-throughput protein interaction networks.
Bader JS; Chaudhuri A; Rothberg JM; Chant J
Nat Biotechnol; 2004 Jan; 22(1):78-85. PubMed ID: 14704708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Combining functional and topological properties to identify core modules in protein interaction networks.
Lubovac Z; Gamalielsson J; Olsson B
Proteins; 2006 Sep; 64(4):948-59. PubMed ID: 16794996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comprehensive mass-spectrometry-based proteome quantification of haploid versus diploid yeast.
de Godoy LM; Olsen JV; Cox J; Nielsen ML; Hubner NC; Fröhlich F; Walther TC; Mann M
Nature; 2008 Oct; 455(7217):1251-4. PubMed ID: 18820680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Probabilistic prediction and ranking of human protein-protein interactions.
Scott MS; Barton GJ
BMC Bioinformatics; 2007 Jul; 8():239. PubMed ID: 17615067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Systematic characterization of the protein interaction network and protein complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using tandem affinity purification and mass spectrometry.
Babu M; Krogan NJ; Awrey DE; Emili A; Greenblatt JF
Methods Mol Biol; 2009; 548():187-207. PubMed ID: 19521826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Gene duplication and hierarchical modularity in intracellular interaction networks.
Hallinan J
Biosystems; 2004; 74(1-3):51-62. PubMed ID: 15125992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Combining multisource information through functional-annotation-based weighting: gene function prediction in yeast.
Ray SS; Bandyopadhyay S; Pal SK
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2009 Feb; 56(2):229-36. PubMed ID: 19272921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Assessment of protein set coherence using functional annotations.
Chagoyen M; Carazo JM; Pascual-Montano A
BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Oct; 9():444. PubMed ID: 18937846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Interaction proteomics: characterization of protein complexes using tandem affinity purification-mass spectrometry.
Völkel P; Le Faou P; Angrand PO
Biochem Soc Trans; 2010 Aug; 38(4):883-7. PubMed ID: 20658971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Systematic bioinformatics and experimental validation of yeast complexes reduces the rate of attrition during structural investigations.
Brooks MA; Gewartowski K; Mitsiki E; Létoquart J; Pache RA; Billier Y; Bertero M; Corréa M; Czarnocki-Cieciura M; Dadlez M; Henriot V; Lazar N; Delbos L; Lebert D; Piwowarski J; Rochaix P; Böttcher B; Serrano L; Séraphin B; van Tilbeurgh H; Aloy P; Perrakis A; Dziembowski A
Structure; 2010 Sep; 18(9):1075-82. PubMed ID: 20826334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Localized network centrality and essentiality in the yeast-protein interaction network.
Park K; Kim D
Proteomics; 2009 Nov; 9(22):5143-54. PubMed ID: 19771559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A novel approach to investigating protein/protein interactions and their functions by TAP-tagged yeast strains and its application to examine yeast transcription machinery.
Jung J; Ahn YJ; Kang LW
J Microbiol Biotechnol; 2008 Apr; 18(4):631-8. PubMed ID: 18467854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Exploration of the function and organization of the yeast early secretory pathway through an epistatic miniarray profile.
Schuldiner M; Collins SR; Thompson NJ; Denic V; Bhamidipati A; Punna T; Ihmels J; Andrews B; Boone C; Greenblatt JF; Weissman JS; Krogan NJ
Cell; 2005 Nov; 123(3):507-19. PubMed ID: 16269340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Protein interaction networks of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Caenorhabditis elegans and Drosophila melanogaster: large-scale organization and robustness.
Li D; Li J; Ouyang S; Wang J; Wu S; Wan P; Zhu Y; Xu X; He F
Proteomics; 2006 Jan; 6(2):456-61. PubMed ID: 16317777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Are scoring functions in protein-protein docking ready to predict interactomes? Clues from a novel binding affinity benchmark.
Kastritis PL; Bonvin AM
J Proteome Res; 2010 May; 9(5):2216-25. PubMed ID: 20329755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. I-DIRT, a general method for distinguishing between specific and nonspecific protein interactions.
Tackett AJ; DeGrasse JA; Sekedat MD; Oeffinger M; Rout MP; Chait BT
J Proteome Res; 2005; 4(5):1752-6. PubMed ID: 16212429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Identification and characterization of protein subcomplexes in yeast.
Hollunder J; Beyer A; Wilhelm T
Proteomics; 2005 May; 5(8):2082-9. PubMed ID: 15832363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Message-passing algorithms for the prediction of protein domain interactions from protein-protein interaction data.
Iqbal M; Freitas AA; Johnson CG; Vergassola M
Bioinformatics; 2008 Sep; 24(18):2064-70. PubMed ID: 18641010
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
