These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1760617)

  • 21. More necropsies will improve patient care: has the case been made?
    Guly H
    Qual Saf Health Care; 2005 Dec; 14(6):397. PubMed ID: 16326780
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Requesting necropsies. Health care must be both evidence based and humanity based.
    Davies T
    BMJ; 1997 Oct; 315(7113):951. PubMed ID: 9361561
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Does it matter who requests necropsies? Prospective study of effect of clinical audit on rate of requests.
    Kamal IS; Forsyth DR; Jones JR
    BMJ; 1997 Jun; 314(7096):1729. PubMed ID: 9202503
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Getting consent for necropsies. Bereavement teams might ask for consent for necropsy.
    Holbrook M; Morgan G
    BMJ; 2001 Dec; 323(7326):1426. PubMed ID: 11778594
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Getting consent for necropsies. Most relatives give consent once reasons for necropsy are explained.
    Scheimberg I; Bates AW; Lee A
    BMJ; 2001 Dec; 323(7326):1426. PubMed ID: 11778593
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. What have we learnt from the Alder Hey affair? Asking for consent would halt decline in voluntary necropsies.
    Osborn M; Thompson EM
    BMJ; 2001 Jun; 322(7301):1542-3. PubMed ID: 11439991
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Quality assurance programme for necropsies.
    Harrison M; Hourihane DO
    J Clin Pathol; 1989 Nov; 42(11):1190-3. PubMed ID: 2584432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Auditing 655 fatalities with pelvic fractures by autopsy as a basis to evaluate trauma care.
    Papadopoulos IN; Kanakaris N; Bonovas S; Triantafillidis A; Garnavos C; Voros D; Leukidis C
    J Am Coll Surg; 2006 Jul; 203(1):30-43. PubMed ID: 16798485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Interdepartmental quality assurance using coded autopsy results.
    Mitchell ML
    Mod Pathol; 1993 Jan; 6(1):48-52. PubMed ID: 8426856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Developing and Implementing an Audit Program for Physician Practices.
    Huey K; Giangreco S
    J Med Pract Manage; 2017 Mar; 32(5):304-306. PubMed ID: 30047699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Characteristics of discrepancies between clinical and autopsy diagnoses in the intensive care unit: a 5-year review.
    Silfvast T; Takkunen O; Kolho E; Andersson LC; Rosenberg P
    Intensive Care Med; 2003 Feb; 29(2):321-4. PubMed ID: 12594594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Prospective study of necropsy audit of geriatric inpatient deaths.
    Paterson DA; Dorovitch MI; Farquhar DL; Cameron HM; Currie CT; Smith RG; MacLennan WJ
    J Clin Pathol; 1992 Jul; 45(7):575-8. PubMed ID: 1517457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. ['Clinical auditing', a novel tool for quality assessment in surgical oncology].
    van Leersum NJ; Kolfschoten NE; Klinkenbijl JH; Tollenaar RA; Wouters MW
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2011; 155(45):A4136. PubMed ID: 22085580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The relational underpinnings of quality internal auditing in medical clinics in Israel.
    Carmeli A; Zisu M
    Soc Sci Med; 2009 Mar; 68(5):894-902. PubMed ID: 19152995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Thoughts on the Witnessed Audit in Medical Device Single Audit Program].
    Wen J; Xiao J; Wang A
    Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 2018 Feb; 42(2):122-124. PubMed ID: 29845814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Reducing healthcare costs facilitated by surgical auditing: a systematic review.
    Govaert JA; van Bommel AC; van Dijk WA; van Leersum NJ; Tollenaar RA; Wouters MW
    World J Surg; 2015 Jul; 39(7):1672-80. PubMed ID: 25691215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Important factors for effective patient safety governance auditing: a questionnaire survey.
    van Gelderen SC; Zegers M; Robben PB; Boeijen W; Westert GP; Wollersheim HC
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2018 Oct; 18(1):798. PubMed ID: 30342516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Funeral directors, mortuaries and necropsies: implications for necropsy consent rates and the prevention of infection.
    Start RD; Dube A; Cross SS; Underwood JC
    J Clin Pathol; 1996 Mar; 49(3):217-22. PubMed ID: 8675732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The use of histology in 638 coronial post-mortem examinations of adults: an audit.
    Langlois NE
    Med Sci Law; 2006 Oct; 46(4):310-20. PubMed ID: 17191634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Significant event auditing. A study of the feasibility and potential of case-based auditing in primary medical care.
    Pringle M; Bradley CP; Carmichael CM; Wallis H; Moore A
    Occas Pap R Coll Gen Pract; 1995 Mar; (70):i-viii, 1-71. PubMed ID: 9248310
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.