These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

273 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17607074)

  • 41. Crack down on fractures.
    Stevens M
    Nurs Stand; 2004 Sep 22-28; 19(2):96. PubMed ID: 15490701
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Bone mass measurement: how, where, when and why?
    Delmas PD
    Int J Fertil Menopausal Stud; 1993; 38 Suppl 2():70-6. PubMed ID: 8252108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Assessment of fracture risk: who should be treated for osteoporosis?
    van der Klift M; de Laet CD; Pols HA
    Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol; 2005 Dec; 19(6):937-50. PubMed ID: 16301188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Low bone mass and postfall fracture risk among elderly nursing home men.
    Toofanny N; Maddens ME; Voytas J; Kowalski D
    J Am Med Dir Assoc; 2004; 5(6):367-70. PubMed ID: 15530173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Imaging of osteoporosis.
    Schneider R
    Rheum Dis Clin North Am; 2013 Aug; 39(3):609-31. PubMed ID: 23719078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. [Bone densitometry in assessment of osteoporosis and fracture risk].
    Kröger H
    Duodecim; 1993; 109(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 8013303
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Management of osteoporosis in men: an update and case example.
    Khan AA; Hodsman AB; Papaioannou A; Kendler D; Brown JP; Olszynski WP
    CMAJ; 2007 Jan; 176(3):345-8. PubMed ID: 17261833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Osteoporosis update from the 2010 santa fe bone symposium.
    Lewiecki EM; Bilezikian JP; Khosla S; Marcus R; McClung MR; Miller PD; Watts NB; Maricic M
    J Clin Densitom; 2011; 14(1):1-21. PubMed ID: 21295739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. [Clinical utility of bone markers in the assessment of fracture risk].
    Ichimura S; Satomi K
    Nihon Rinsho; 2007 Nov; 65 Suppl 9():259-63. PubMed ID: 18161116
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Clinical utility of microarchitecture measurements of trabecular bone.
    Carballido-Gamio J; Majumdar S
    Curr Osteoporos Rep; 2006 Jun; 4(2):64-70. PubMed ID: 16822405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Noninvasive assessments of bone strength.
    Bonnick SL
    Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes; 2007 Dec; 14(6):451-7. PubMed ID: 17982351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Bone volume fraction explains the variation in strength and stiffness of cancellous bone affected by metastatic cancer and osteoporosis.
    Nazarian A; von Stechow D; Zurakowski D; Müller R; Snyder BD
    Calcif Tissue Int; 2008 Dec; 83(6):368-79. PubMed ID: 18946628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. What is the role of DXA, QUS and bone markers in fracture prediction, treatment allocation and monitoring?
    Briot K; Roux C
    Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol; 2005 Dec; 19(6):951-64. PubMed ID: 16301189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Clinical Evaluation of Bone Strength and Fracture Risk.
    de Bakker CMJ; Tseng WJ; Li Y; Zhao H; Liu XS
    Curr Osteoporos Rep; 2017 Feb; 15(1):32-42. PubMed ID: 28185216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Technology insight: noninvasive assessment of bone strength in osteoporosis.
    Bouxsein ML
    Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol; 2008 Jun; 4(6):310-8. PubMed ID: 18431371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Underdiagnosis and under-treatment of osteoporosis following fragility fracture.
    Aboyoussef M; Vierkoetter KR
    Hawaii Med J; 2007 Jul; 66(7):185-7. PubMed ID: 17879856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Novel assessment tools for osteoporosis diagnosis and treatment.
    Gong B; Mandair GS; Wehrli FW; Morris MD
    Curr Osteoporos Rep; 2014 Sep; 12(3):357-65. PubMed ID: 24879507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Better bone density reporting: T-score report versus fracture risk report with outcome analysis.
    Greenwald L; Barajas K; White-Greenwald M
    Am J Manag Care; 2003 Oct; 9(10):665-70. PubMed ID: 14572176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. In vivo assessment of trabecular and cortical bone microstructure.
    Nishiyama KK; Boyd SK
    Clin Calcium; 2011 Jul; 21(7):1011-9. PubMed ID: 21719981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Bone mineral density evaluation in osteoporosis: why yes and why not?
    Celi M; Rao C; Scialdoni A; Tempesta V; Gasbarra E; Pistillo P; Tarantino U
    Aging Clin Exp Res; 2013 Oct; 25 Suppl 1():S47-9. PubMed ID: 24046042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.