BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

372 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17607102)

  • 1. Screw pull-out force is dependent on screw orientation in an anterior cervical plate construct.
    DiPaola CP; Jacobson JA; Awad H; Conrad BP; Rechtine GR
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2007 Jul; 20(5):369-73. PubMed ID: 17607102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Screw orientation and plate type (variable- vs. fixed-angle) effect strength of fixation for in vitro biomechanical testing of the Synthes CSLP.
    Dipaola CP; Jacobson JA; Awad H; Conrad BP; Rechtine GR
    Spine J; 2008; 8(5):717-22. PubMed ID: 17983846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pullout analysis of a lumbar plate with varying screw orientations: experimental and computational analyses.
    Rios D; Patacxil WM; Palmer DK; Williams PA; Cheng WK; Inceoğlu S
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2012 Jul; 37(16):E942-8. PubMed ID: 22433507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Proximal half angle of the screw thread is a critical design variable affecting the pull-out strength of cancellous bone screws.
    Wang Y; Mori R; Ozoe N; Nakai T; Uchio Y
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2009 Nov; 24(9):781-5. PubMed ID: 19699567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cortical bone trajectory for lumbar pedicle screws.
    Santoni BG; Hynes RA; McGilvray KC; Rodriguez-Canessa G; Lyons AS; Henson MA; Womack WJ; Puttlitz CM
    Spine J; 2009 May; 9(5):366-73. PubMed ID: 18790684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A comparison of parallel and diverging screw angles in the stability of locked plate constructs.
    Wähnert D; Windolf M; Brianza S; Rothstock S; Radtke R; Brighenti V; Schwieger K
    J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2011 Sep; 93(9):1259-64. PubMed ID: 21911539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of divergent screw placement on the initial strength of plate-to-bone fixation.
    Robert KQ; Chandler R; Baratta RV; Thomas KA; Harris MB
    J Trauma; 2003 Dec; 55(6):1139-44. PubMed ID: 14676661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Primary pedicle screw augmentation in osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae: biomechanical analysis of pedicle fixation strength.
    Burval DJ; McLain RF; Milks R; Inceoglu S
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 May; 32(10):1077-83. PubMed ID: 17471088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Influence of screw positioning in a new anterior spine fixator on implant loosening in osteoporotic vertebrae.
    Reinhold M; Schwieger K; Goldhahn J; Linke B; Knop C; Blauth M
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Feb; 31(4):406-13. PubMed ID: 16481950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of dilation of immature pedicles on pullout strength of the screws: Part 2: In vivo study.
    Yilmaz G; Demirkiran G; Ozkan C; Daglioglu K; Pekmezci M; Alanay A; Yazici M
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Oct; 34(22):2378-83. PubMed ID: 19829250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of misalignment on static torsional strength of anterior cervical plate systems.
    Chin KR; Cumming VB; Henson M; Murrell B; Chan FW
    Spine J; 2013 Nov; 13(11):1544-8. PubMed ID: 23800821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cervical pedicle screws vs. lateral mass screws: uniplanar fatigue analysis and residual pullout strengths.
    Johnston TL; Karaikovic EE; Lautenschlager EP; Marcu D
    Spine J; 2006; 6(6):667-72. PubMed ID: 17088197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biomechanical comparison of odontoid plate fixation versus odontoid screw fixation.
    Platzer P; Eipeldauer S; Leitgeb J; Aldrian S; Vécsei V
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2011 May; 24(3):164-9. PubMed ID: 21508724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Biomechanical evaluation of parasagittal occipital plating: screw load sharing analysis.
    Frush TJ; Fisher TJ; Ensminger SC; Truumees E; Demetropoulos CK
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Apr; 34(9):877-84. PubMed ID: 19531996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pedicle screw fixation strength: pullout versus insertional torque.
    Inceoglu S; Ferrara L; McLain RF
    Spine J; 2004; 4(5):513-8. PubMed ID: 15363421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Holding power of variable pitch screws in osteoporotic, osteopenic and normal bone: are all screws created equal?
    Ramaswamy R; Evans S; Kosashvili Y
    Injury; 2010 Feb; 41(2):179-83. PubMed ID: 19747678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Locking plates increase the strength of dynamic hip screws.
    Jewell DP; Gheduzzi S; Mitchell MS; Miles AW
    Injury; 2008 Feb; 39(2):209-12. PubMed ID: 17880976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of screw insertion torque and pullout strength.
    Ricci WM; Tornetta P; Petteys T; Gerlach D; Cartner J; Walker Z; Russell TA
    J Orthop Trauma; 2010 Jun; 24(6):374-8. PubMed ID: 20502221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Hydroxyapatite-coating of pedicle screws improves resistance against pull-out force in the osteoporotic canine lumbar spine model: a pilot study.
    Hasegawa T; Inufusa A; Imai Y; Mikawa Y; Lim TH; An HS
    Spine J; 2005; 5(3):239-43. PubMed ID: 15863077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Biomechanical comparison of anatomic trajectory pedicle screw versus injectable calcium sulfate graft-augmented pedicle screw for salvage in cadaveric thoracic bone.
    Derincek A; Wu C; Mehbod A; Transfeldt EE
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2006 Jun; 19(4):286-91. PubMed ID: 16778665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.