These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

293 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17607290)

  • 21. Evaluation of randomized discontinuation design.
    Freidlin B; Simon R
    J Clin Oncol; 2005 Aug; 23(22):5094-8. PubMed ID: 15983399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Design of clinical trials of gene therapy in Parkinson disease.
    Lewis TB; Standaert DG
    Exp Neurol; 2008 Jan; 209(1):41-7. PubMed ID: 17920590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Phase II clinical trial design: methods in translational research from the Genitourinary Committee at the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group.
    Gray R; Manola J; Saxman S; Wright J; Dutcher J; Atkins M; Carducci M; See W; Sweeney C; Liu G; Stein M; Dreicer R; Wilding G; DiPaola RS
    Clin Cancer Res; 2006 Apr; 12(7 Pt 1):1966-9. PubMed ID: 16609005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Individualized chemotherapy in multiple myeloma by cytostatic drug sensitivity testing of colony-forming stem cells.
    Ludwig H; Fritz E
    Anticancer Res; 1981; 1(6):329-34. PubMed ID: 7344610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Optimizing randomized phase II trials assessing tumor progression.
    Stone A; Wheeler C; Carroll K; Barge A
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2007 Feb; 28(2):146-52. PubMed ID: 16807129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Strategies for designing clinical trials for oligonucleotide therapeutics.
    Wacheck V
    Drug Discov Today; 2004 Nov; 9(21):918-23. PubMed ID: 15501726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Risks and benefits associated with novel phase 1 oncology trial designs.
    Koyfman SA; Agrawal M; Garrett-Mayer E; Krohmal B; Wolf E; Emanuel EJ; Gross CP
    Cancer; 2007 Sep; 110(5):1115-24. PubMed ID: 17628485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Is response rate relevant to the phase II trial design of targeted agents?
    Dowlati A; Fu P
    J Clin Oncol; 2008 Mar; 26(8):1204-5. PubMed ID: 18285601
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Early average change in tumor size in a phase 2 trial: efficient endpoint or false promise?
    Rubinstein LV; Dancey JE; Korn EL; Smith MA; Wright JJ
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Oct; 99(19):1422-3. PubMed ID: 17895470
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Clinical endpoints for drug development in prostate cancer.
    Ramiah V; George DJ; Armstrong AJ
    Curr Opin Urol; 2008 May; 18(3):303-8. PubMed ID: 18382240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Design of Phase II cancer trials for evaluation of cytostatic/cytotoxic agents.
    Kocherginsky M; Cohen EE; Karrison T
    J Biopharm Stat; 2009; 19(3):524-9. PubMed ID: 19384693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Adaptive signature design: an adaptive clinical trial design for generating and prospectively testing a gene expression signature for sensitive patients.
    Freidlin B; Simon R
    Clin Cancer Res; 2005 Nov; 11(21):7872-8. PubMed ID: 16278411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Two-stage designs for dose-finding trials with a biologic endpoint using stepwise tests.
    Polley MY; Cheung YK
    Biometrics; 2008 Mar; 64(1):232-41. PubMed ID: 17573866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A parallel phase I/II clinical trial design for combination therapies.
    Huang X; Biswas S; Oki Y; Issa JP; Berry DA
    Biometrics; 2007 Jun; 63(2):429-36. PubMed ID: 17688495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Phase I trials: from traditional to newer approaches part II.
    Macaluso M; Krams M; Preskorn SH
    J Psychiatr Pract; 2011 Jul; 17(4):277-84. PubMed ID: 21775829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Utility of bortezomib retreatment in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma patients: a multicenter case series.
    Wolf J; Richardson PG; Schuster M; LeBlanc A; Walters IB; Battleman DS
    Clin Adv Hematol Oncol; 2008 Oct; 6(10):755-60. PubMed ID: 18997666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. General and statistical hierarchy of appropriate biologic endpoints.
    Sargent D
    Oncology (Williston Park); 2006 May; 20(6 Suppl 5):5-9. PubMed ID: 16773839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Translation of innovative designs into phase I trials.
    Rogatko A; Schoeneck D; Jonas W; Tighiouart M; Khuri FR; Porter A
    J Clin Oncol; 2007 Nov; 25(31):4982-6. PubMed ID: 17971597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Examining heterogeneity in phase II trial designs may improve success in phase III.
    Tuma RS
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 Feb; 100(3):164-6. PubMed ID: 18230788
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Systematic survey of therapeutic trials for metastatic colorectal cancer: room for improvement in the critical pathway.
    Kopetz S; Overman M; Chang DZ; Glover KY; Shureiqi I; Wolff RA; Abbruzzese JL; Eng C
    J Clin Oncol; 2008 Apr; 26(12):2000-5. PubMed ID: 18421052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.