356 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17608111)
1. Money matters...but not when it comes to improving quality: study.
Becker C
Mod Healthc; 2007 Jun; 37(24):9. PubMed ID: 17608111
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Quality connections. Financial rewards lead to better care, study says.
Loos R
Mod Healthc; 2005 May; 35(19):8-9. PubMed ID: 15929245
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Piloting does to EMRs. Physicians hope CMS' EHR bonus project portends a broader shift in reimbursement priorities.
Raths D
Healthc Inform; 2008 Feb; 25(2):38, 40. PubMed ID: 18320877
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Right on the money. CMS awarding pay-for-performance bonuses.
Becker C
Mod Healthc; 2005 Nov; 35(46):8-9. PubMed ID: 16334812
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Time to pay for quality. CMS will partner with premier in trial project to give financial bonuses to hospitals that deliver the best care.
Becker C
Mod Healthc; 2003 Jun; 33(26):6-7, 16, 1. PubMed ID: 12858633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. For this hospital, money is secondary.
Healthcare Benchmarks Qual Improv; 2005 Jul; 12(7):76-7. PubMed ID: 16021976
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Study casts new doubt on effectiveness of P4P.
Healthcare Benchmarks Qual Improv; 2007 Aug; 14(8):88-9. PubMed ID: 17715880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pay-for-performance: Medicare's new reimbursement twist.
Miller-Meeks M
Iowa Med; 2007; 97(1):8. PubMed ID: 17444298
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Quality and money. A new CSC report looks at major Medicare hospital reimbursement changes on the horizon.
Hagland M
Healthc Inform; 2011 Nov; 28(11):36, 38, 40. PubMed ID: 22125819
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. CMS tries cash this time. New quality reporting program has financial incentives.
Lubell J
Mod Healthc; 2007 Apr; 37(15):12-3. PubMed ID: 17494350
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Weak prospects. Federal Medicaid P4P proposal has skeptics.
Lubell J
Mod Healthc; 2007 Feb; 37(8):10. PubMed ID: 17348345
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Do demonstration project's numbers really validate P4P? Observers say other factors play role in improvement.
Healthcare Benchmarks Qual Improv; 2006 Feb; 13(2):13-6. PubMed ID: 16544555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Medicare evaluates pay-for-performance.
Fine A
Manag Care Q; 2006; 14(1):22-3. PubMed ID: 17590974
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Quality disconnect. Tools not ready for pay-for-performance: study.
Conn J
Mod Healthc; 2006 Dec 18-25; 36(50):8-9. PubMed ID: 17216707
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Quality measures gain importance as CMS moves to value-based purchasing.
Hosp Case Manag; 2007 Aug; 15(8):119-21. PubMed ID: 17691253
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Doc resistance. Quality reporting initiative may be too cumbersome.
Lubell J
Mod Healthc; 2007 May; 37(22):10-1. PubMed ID: 17612021
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. New CMS 'error' rule has access implications.
Hosp Case Manag; 2007 Nov; 15(11):173-5. PubMed ID: 17982835
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Paying more for results. CMS tries to enlist Premier to tie hospital reimbursement to quality performance.
Duff S
Mod Healthc; 2002 Sep; 32(37):9. PubMed ID: 12375411
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Pay-for-performance incentives: are you missing out on revenue?
Hosp Peer Rev; 2005 Oct; 30(10):133-6. PubMed ID: 16218299
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. P4P--the next generation. Providers need to be involved in designing new incentive payment programs.
Norling R
Mod Healthc; 2006 Nov; 36(46):20. PubMed ID: 17153788
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
