These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17608551)

  • 1. Long-term study of dental implants placed into alveolar cleft sites.
    Matsui Y; Ohno K; Nishimura A; Shirota T; Kim S; Miyashita H
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2007 Jul; 44(4):444-7. PubMed ID: 17608551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Long-term follow-up of dental implants placed in a grafted alveolar cleft: evaluation of alveolar bone height.
    Takahashi T; Inai T; Kochi S; Fukuda M; Yamaguchi T; Matsui K; Echigo S; Watanabe M
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Mar; 105(3):297-302. PubMed ID: 18280962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Implant marginal bone loss in maxillary sinus grafts.
    Herzberg R; Dolev E; Schwartz-Arad D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(1):103-10. PubMed ID: 16519188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reconstruction of residual alveolar cleft defects with one-stage mandibular bone grafts and osseointegrated implants.
    Jensen J; Sindet-Pedersen S; Enemark H
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1998 Apr; 56(4):460-6; discussion 467. PubMed ID: 9541346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Marginal bone loss pattern around hydroxyapatite-coated versus commercially pure titanium implants after up to 12 years of follow-up.
    Schwartz-Arad D; Mardinger O; Levin L; Kozlovsky A; Hirshberg A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2005; 20(2):238-44. PubMed ID: 15839117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Maxillary alveolar ridge reconstruction with nonvascularized autogenous block bone: clinical results.
    Barone A; Covani U
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Oct; 65(10):2039-46. PubMed ID: 17884536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Placement of endosseous implants in grafted alveolar clefts.
    Kearns G; Perrott DH; Sharma A; Kaban LB; Vargervik K
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1997 Nov; 34(6):520-5. PubMed ID: 9431470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Long-term evaluation of implant survival in augmented sinuses: a case series.
    Yamamichi N; Itose T; Neiva R; Wang HL
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2008 Apr; 28(2):163-9. PubMed ID: 18546812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Use of endosseous implants for dental reconstruction of patients with grafted alveolar clefts.
    Takahashi T; Fukuda M; Yamaguchi T; Kochi S
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1997 Jun; 55(6):576-83; discussion 584. PubMed ID: 9191639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The role of endosseous implants in the management of alveolar clefts.
    Pena WA; Vargervik K; Sharma A; Oberoi S
    Pediatr Dent; 2009; 31(4):329-33. PubMed ID: 19722443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Long-term assessment (5 to 71 months) of endosseous dental implants placed in the augmented maxillary sinus.
    Olson JW; Dent CD; Morris HF; Ochi S
    Ann Periodontol; 2000 Dec; 5(1):152-6. PubMed ID: 11885175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Endosseous implants for prosthetic rehabilitation in bone grafted alveolar clefts.
    Ronchi P; Chiapasco M; Frattini D
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 1995 Dec; 23(6):382-6. PubMed ID: 8839333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Crestal bone changes around titanium implants. Part I: A retrospective radiographic evaluation in humans comparing two non-submerged implant designs with different machined collar lengths.
    Hänggi MP; Hänggi DC; Schoolfield JD; Meyer J; Cochran DL; Hermann JS
    J Periodontol; 2005 May; 76(5):791-802. PubMed ID: 15898941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Inter-implant bone height changes in anterior maxillary immediate and non-immediate adjacent dental implants.
    Kupershmidt I; Levin L; Schwartz-Arad D
    J Periodontol; 2007 Jun; 78(6):991-6. PubMed ID: 17539710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Marginal bone stability using 3 different flap approaches for alveolar split expansion for dental implants: a 1-year clinical study.
    Jensen OT; Cullum DR; Baer D
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Sep; 67(9):1921-30. PubMed ID: 19686930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Alveolar cleft repair in adults using guided bone regeneration with mineralized allograft for dental implant site development: a report of 2 cases.
    Le BT; Woo I
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Aug; 67(8):1716-22. PubMed ID: 19615587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dental implants in patients with orofacial clefts: a long-term follow-up study.
    Kramer FJ; Baethge C; Swennen G; Bremer B; Schwestka-Polly R; Dempf R
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Oct; 34(7):715-21. PubMed ID: 16157247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dental implants in alveolar cleft patients: a retrospective study.
    Härtel J; Pögl C; Henkel KO; Gundlach KK
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 1999 Dec; 27(6):354-7. PubMed ID: 10870753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical outcomes of dental implant therapy in alveolar cleft patients: a systematic review.
    Wang F; Wu Y; Zou D; Wang G; Kaigler D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(5):1098-105. PubMed ID: 25216135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A 5- to 6-year radiological evaluation of titanium plasma sprayed/sandblasted and acid-etched implants: results from private practice.
    Dam HG; Najm SA; Nurdin N; Bischof M; Finkelman M; Nedir R
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Feb; 25(2):e159-65. PubMed ID: 23360220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.