2732 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17608736)
1. Biomechanical and histomorphometric comparison between zirconia implants with varying surface textures and a titanium implant in the maxilla of miniature pigs.
Gahlert M; Gudehus T; Eichhorn S; Steinhauser E; Kniha H; Erhardt W
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):662-8. PubMed ID: 17608736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Osseointegration of zirconia implants with different surface characteristics: an evaluation in rabbits.
Hoffmann O; Angelov N; Zafiropoulos GG; Andreana S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(2):352-8. PubMed ID: 22442775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biomechanical evaluation of a microstructured zirconia implant by a removal torque comparison with a standard Ti-SLA implant.
Bormann KH; Gellrich NC; Kniha H; Dard M; Wieland M; Gahlert M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Oct; 23(10):1210-6. PubMed ID: 22092587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Removal torque values of titanium implants in the maxilla of miniature pigs.
Buser D; Nydegger T; Hirt HP; Cochran DL; Nolte LP
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(5):611-9. PubMed ID: 9796144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanical evaluation of the interfacial strength of a chemically modified sandblasted and acid-etched titanium surface.
Ferguson SJ; Broggini N; Wieland M; de Wild M; Rupp F; Geis-Gerstorfer J; Cochran DL; Buser D
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2006 Aug; 78(2):291-7. PubMed ID: 16637025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. In vivo performance of zirconia and titanium implants: a histomorphometric study in mini pig maxillae.
Gahlert M; Roehling S; Sprecher CM; Kniha H; Milz S; Bormann K
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Mar; 23(3):281-6. PubMed ID: 21806681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Osseointegration of zirconia and titanium dental implants: a histological and histomorphometrical study in the maxilla of pigs.
Gahlert M; Röhling S; Wieland M; Sprecher CM; Kniha H; Milz S
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Nov; 20(11):1247-53. PubMed ID: 19531104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of electrochemically deposited nanohydroxyapatite on bone bonding of sandblasted/dual acid-etched titanium implant.
He F; Yang G; Wang X; Zhao S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):790-9. PubMed ID: 19865618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of dehiscences to the bone response of implants with an Acid-etched surface: an experimental study in miniature pigs.
Ruehe B; Heberer S; Bayreuther K; Nelson K
J Oral Implantol; 2011; 37(1):3-17. PubMed ID: 20557147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanical comparison of different surface modifications for dental implants.
Ferguson SJ; Langhoff JD; Voelter K; von Rechenberg B; Scharnweber D; Bierbaum S; Schnabelrauch M; Kautz AR; Frauchiger VM; Mueller TL; van Lenthe GH; Schlottig F
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(6):1037-46. PubMed ID: 19216272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Bone apposition around two different sandblasted and acid-etched titanium implant surfaces: a histomorphometric study in canine mandibles.
Bornstein MM; Valderrama P; Jones AA; Wilson TG; Seibl R; Cochran DL
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Mar; 19(3):233-41. PubMed ID: 18177427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mechanical anchorage and peri-implant bone formation of surface-modified zirconia in minipigs.
Schliephake H; Hefti T; Schlottig F; Gédet P; Staedt H
J Clin Periodontol; 2010 Sep; 37(9):818-28. PubMed ID: 20573183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biomechanical and histomorphometric evaluation of osseointegration of fusion-sputtered zirconia implants.
Salem NA; Abo Taleb AL; Aboushelib MN
J Prosthodont; 2013 Jun; 22(4):261-7. PubMed ID: 23107438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of a new titanium-zirconium dental implant: a biomechanical and histological comparative study in the mini pig.
Gottlow J; Dard M; Kjellson F; Obrecht M; Sennerby L
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Aug; 14(4):538-45. PubMed ID: 20586785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Osseointegration of titanium implants with a roughened surface containing hydride ion in a rabbit model.
Cheng Z; Zhang F; He F; Zhang L; Guo C; Zhao S; Yang G
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Jul; 110(1):e5-12. PubMed ID: 20610295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The role of titanium implant surface modification with hydroxyapatite nanoparticles in progressive early bone-implant fixation in vivo.
Lin A; Wang CJ; Kelly J; Gubbi P; Nishimura I
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(5):808-16. PubMed ID: 19865620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomechanical and histological behavior of zirconia implants: an experiment in the rat.
Kohal RJ; Wolkewitz M; Hinze M; Han JS; Bächle M; Butz F
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Apr; 20(4):333-9. PubMed ID: 19298287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanical evaluation of a titanium implant surface conditioned by a hydroxide ion solution.
Stadlinger B; Ferguson SJ; Eckelt U; Mai R; Lode AT; Loukota R; Schlottig F
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Jan; 50(1):74-9. PubMed ID: 21177005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Surface-modified zirconia implants: tissue response in rabbits.
Rocchietta I; Fontana F; Addis A; Schupbach P; Simion M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Aug; 20(8):844-50. PubMed ID: 19604281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison study of the osseointegration of zirconia and titanium dental implants. A biomechanical evaluation in the maxilla of pigs.
Gahlert M; Röhling S; Wieland M; Eichhorn S; Küchenhoff H; Kniha H
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2010 Dec; 12(4):297-305. PubMed ID: 19438936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
