These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17610283)
1. Reader and platform reproducibility for quantitative assessment of carotid atherosclerotic plaque using 1.5T Siemens, Philips, and General Electric scanners. Saam T; Hatsukami TS; Yarnykh VL; Hayes CE; Underhill H; Chu B; Takaya N; Cai J; Kerwin WS; Xu D; Polissar NL; Neradilek B; Hamar WK; Maki J; Shaw DW; Buck RJ; Wyman B; Yuan C J Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Aug; 26(2):344-52. PubMed ID: 17610283 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intra-individual comparison of carotid and femoral atherosclerotic plaque features with in vivo MR plaque imaging. Helck A; Bianda N; Canton G; Yuan C; Hippe DS; Reiser MF; Gallino A; Wyttenbach R; Saam T Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Dec; 31(8):1611-8. PubMed ID: 26296806 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Scan-rescan reproducibility of carotid atherosclerotic plaque morphology and tissue composition measurements using multicontrast MRI at 3T. Li F; Yarnykh VL; Hatsukami TS; Chu B; Balu N; Wang J; Underhill HR; Zhao X; Smith R; Yuan C J Magn Reson Imaging; 2010 Jan; 31(1):168-76. PubMed ID: 20027584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessing the Accuracy and Reproducibility of PARIETAL: A Deep Learning Brain Extraction Algorithm. Valverde S; Coll L; Valencia L; Clèrigues A; Oliver A; Vilanova JC; Ramió-Torrentà L; Rovira À; Lladó X J Magn Reson Imaging; 2024 Jun; 59(6):1991-2000. PubMed ID: 34137113 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Carotid plaque morphometric assessment with three-dimensional ultrasound imaging. AlMuhanna K; Hossain MM; Zhao L; Fischell J; Kowalewski G; Dux M; Sikdar S; Lal BK J Vasc Surg; 2015 Mar; 61(3):690-7. PubMed ID: 25499716 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prevalence of American Heart Association type VI carotid atherosclerotic lesions identified by magnetic resonance imaging for different levels of stenosis as measured by duplex ultrasound. Saam T; Underhill HR; Chu B; Takaya N; Cai J; Polissar NL; Yuan C; Hatsukami TS J Am Coll Cardiol; 2008 Mar; 51(10):1014-21. PubMed ID: 18325441 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Scan-rescan repeatability and cross-scanner comparability of DTI metrics in healthy subjects in the SPRINT-MS multicenter trial. Zhou X; Sakaie KE; Debbins JP; Narayanan S; Fox RJ; Lowe MJ Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 Nov; 53():105-111. PubMed ID: 30048675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Validation of 3D ultrasound vessel wall volume: an imaging phenotype of carotid atherosclerosis. Egger M; Spence JD; Fenster A; Parraga G Ultrasound Med Biol; 2007 Jun; 33(6):905-14. PubMed ID: 17445962 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of 3T MR scanners in regional cartilage-thickness analysis in osteoarthritis: a cross-sectional multicenter, multivendor study. Balamoody S; Williams TG; Waterton JC; Bowes M; Hodgson R; Taylor CJ; Hutchinson CE Arthritis Res Ther; 2010; 12(5):R202. PubMed ID: 21029439 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Single sweep three-dimensional carotid ultrasound: reproducibility in plaque and artery volume measurements. Kalashyan H; Shuaib A; Gibson PH; Romanchuk H; Saqqur M; Khan K; Osborne J; Becher H Atherosclerosis; 2014 Feb; 232(2):397-402. PubMed ID: 24468154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Whole brain quantitative T2 MRI across multiple scanners with dual echo FSE: applications to AD, MCI, and normal aging. Bauer CM; Jara H; Killiany R; Neuroimage; 2010 Aug; 52(2):508-14. PubMed ID: 20441797 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Three-dimensional carotid ultrasound segmentation variability dependence on signal difference and boundary orientation. Chiu B; Krasinski A; Spence JD; Parraga G; Fenster A Ultrasound Med Biol; 2010 Jan; 36(1):95-110. PubMed ID: 19900751 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Carotid magnetic resonance imaging for monitoring atherosclerotic plaque progression: a multicenter reproducibility study. Sun J; Zhao XQ; Balu N; Hippe DS; Hatsukami TS; Isquith DA; Yamada K; Neradilek MB; Cantón G; Xue Y; Fleg JL; Desvigne-Nickens P; Klimas MT; Padley RJ; Vassileva MT; Wyman BT; Yuan C Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Jan; 31(1):95-103. PubMed ID: 25216871 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Interstudy reproducibility of three-dimensional volume-selective fast spin echo magnetic resonance for quantifying carotid artery wall volume. Varghese A; Crowe LA; Mohiaddin RH; Gatehouse PD; Yang GZ; Nott DM; McCall JM; Firmin DN; Pennell DJ J Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 Feb; 21(2):187-91. PubMed ID: 15666396 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. High field carotid vessel wall imaging: a study on reproducibility. Kröner ES; Westenberg JJ; van der Geest RJ; Brouwer NJ; Doornbos J; Kooi ME; van der Wall EE; Lamb HJ; Siebelink HJ Eur J Radiol; 2013 Apr; 82(4):680-5. PubMed ID: 23246333 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Intra- and interreader reproducibility of magnetic resonance imaging for quantifying the lipid-rich necrotic core is improved with gadolinium contrast enhancement. Takaya N; Cai J; Ferguson MS; Yarnykh VL; Chu B; Saam T; Polissar NL; Sherwood J; Cury RC; Anders RJ; Broschat KO; Hinton D; Furie KL; Hatsukami TS; Yuan C J Magn Reson Imaging; 2006 Jul; 24(1):203-10. PubMed ID: 16739123 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reproducibility of carotid atherosclerotic lesion type characterization using high resolution multicontrast weighted cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Chu B; Phan BA; Balu N; Yuan C; Brown BG; Zhao XQ J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2006; 8(6):793-9. PubMed ID: 17060101 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Inter-scanner reproducibility of brain volumetry: influence of automated brain segmentation software. Liu S; Hou B; Zhang Y; Lin T; Fan X; You H; Feng F BMC Neurosci; 2020 Sep; 21(1):35. PubMed ID: 32887546 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of the reproducibility of quantitative cardiac left ventricular assessments in healthy volunteers using different MRI scanners: a multicenter simulation. Gandy SJ; Waugh SA; Nicholas RS; Simpson HJ; Milne W; Houston JG J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Aug; 28(2):359-65. PubMed ID: 18666157 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]