227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17610647)
1. Electrical impedance model for evaluation of skin irritation in rabbits and humans.
Ferreira DM; Silva CS; Souza MN
Skin Res Technol; 2007 Aug; 13(3):259-67. PubMed ID: 17610647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of lotion formulations on irritation using the modified forearm-controlled application test method.
Farage MA; Ebrahimpour A; Steimle B; Englehart J; Smith D
Skin Res Technol; 2007 Aug; 13(3):268-79. PubMed ID: 17610648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of skin susceptibility to irritancy by routine patch testing with sodium lauryl sulfate.
Löffler H; Pirker C; Aramaki J; Frosch PJ; Happle R; Effendy I
Eur J Dermatol; 2001; 11(5):416-9. PubMed ID: 11525947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sequential application of cold and sodium lauryl sulphate decreases irritation and barrier disruption in vivo in humans.
Fluhr JW; Bornkessel A; Akengin A; Fuchs S; Norgauer J; Kleesz P; Grieshaber R; Elsner P
Br J Dermatol; 2005 Apr; 152(4):702-8. PubMed ID: 15840102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Electrical impedance for quantification and classification of experimental skin reactions.
Emtestam L; Nyrén M
Am J Contact Dermat; 1997 Dec; 8(4):202-6. PubMed ID: 9358110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Irritants in combination with a synergistic or additive effect on the skin response: an overview of tandem irritation studies.
Kartono F; Maibach HI
Contact Dermatitis; 2006 Jun; 54(6):303-12. PubMed ID: 16787451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Development of a sensitive test method to evaluate mechanical irritation potential on mucosal skin.
Farage MA; Meyer S; Walter D
Skin Res Technol; 2004 May; 10(2):85-95. PubMed ID: 15059175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Correlation of impedance response patterns to histological findings in irritant skin reactions induced by various surfactants.
Nicander I; Ollmar S; Eek A; Lundh Rozell B; Emtestam L
Br J Dermatol; 1996 Feb; 134(2):221-8. PubMed ID: 8746333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Additive impairment of the barrier function by mechanical irritation, occlusion and sodium lauryl sulphate in vivo.
Fluhr JW; Akengin A; Bornkessel A; Fuchs S; Praessler J; Norgauer J; Grieshaber R; Kleesz P; Elsner P
Br J Dermatol; 2005 Jul; 153(1):125-31. PubMed ID: 16029337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Electrical impedance measured to five skin depths in mild irritant dermatitis induced by sodium lauryl sulphate.
Nicander I; Ollmar S; Rozell BL; Eek A; Emtestam L
Br J Dermatol; 1995 May; 132(5):718-24. PubMed ID: 7772476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fruit acids and sodium hydroxide in the food industry and their combined effect with sodium lauryl sulphate: controlled in vivo tandem irritation study.
Fluhr JW; Bankova L; Fuchs S; Kelterer D; Schliemann-Willers S; Norgauer J; Kleesz P; Grieshaber R; Elsner P
Br J Dermatol; 2004 Nov; 151(5):1039-48. PubMed ID: 15541082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The irritant potential of n-propanol (nonanoic acid vehicle) in cumulative skin irritation: a validation study of two different human in vivo test models.
Clemmensen A; Andersen F; Petersen TK; Kalden H; Melgaard A; Andersen KE
Skin Res Technol; 2008 Aug; 14(3):277-86. PubMed ID: 19159372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Is it possible to characterize objectively sensitive skin?
Diogo L; Papoila AL
Skin Res Technol; 2010 Feb; 16(1):30-7. PubMed ID: 20384881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of acute skin irritation in rabbits using electrical impedance model.
Ferreira DM; Silva CS; Souza MN
Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2006; 2006():1665-8. PubMed ID: 17945658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Variation in barrier impairment and inflammation of human skin as determined by sodium lauryl sulphate penetration rate.
de Jongh CM; Jakasa I; Verberk MM; Kezic S
Br J Dermatol; 2006 Apr; 154(4):651-7. PubMed ID: 16536807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The hairless guinea-pig as a model for treatment of cumulative irritation in humans.
Andersen F; Hedegaard K; Petersen TK; Bindslev-Jensen C; Fullerton A; Andersen KE
Skin Res Technol; 2006 Feb; 12(1):60-7. PubMed ID: 16420540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of the effects of topical clobetasol propionate by visual score, electrical impedance and laser Doppler flowmetry.
Emtestam L; Kuzmina N; Talme T
Skin Res Technol; 2007 Feb; 13(1):73-8. PubMed ID: 17250535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Electrical impedance index in human skin: measurements after occlusion, in 5 anatomical regions and in mild irritant contact dermatitis.
Emtestam L; Ollmar S
Contact Dermatitis; 1993 Feb; 28(2):104-8. PubMed ID: 8458202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Long-term repetitive sodium lauryl sulfate-induced irritation of the skin: an in vivo study.
Branco N; Lee I; Zhai H; Maibach HI
Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Nov; 53(5):278-84. PubMed ID: 16283906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Induction of a hardening phenomenon by repeated application of SLS: analysis of lipid changes in the stratum corneum.
Heinemann C; Paschold C; Fluhr J; Wigger-Alberti W; Schliemann-Willers S; Farwanah H; Raith K; Neubert R; Elsner P
Acta Derm Venereol; 2005; 85(4):290-5. PubMed ID: 16191847
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
