These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17611744)

  • 1. Greater reliance on impedance control in the nondominant arm compared with the dominant arm when adapting to a novel dynamic environment.
    Schabowsky CN; Hidler JM; Lum PS
    Exp Brain Res; 2007 Oct; 182(4):567-77. PubMed ID: 17611744
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Laterality effects in motor learning by mental practice in right-handers.
    Gentili RJ; Papaxanthis C
    Neuroscience; 2015 Jun; 297():231-42. PubMed ID: 25797464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Feedforward compensation for novel dynamics depends on force field orientation but is similar for the left and right arms.
    Reuter EM; Cunnington R; Mattingley JB; Riek S; Carroll TJ
    J Neurophysiol; 2016 Nov; 116(5):2260-2271. PubMed ID: 27582293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Trans-radial upper extremity amputees are capable of adapting to a novel dynamic environment.
    Schabowsky CN; Dromerick AW; Holley RJ; Monroe B; Lum PS
    Exp Brain Res; 2008 Jul; 188(4):589-601. PubMed ID: 18443766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Learned dynamics of reaching movements generalize from dominant to nondominant arm.
    Criscimagna-Hemminger SE; Donchin O; Gazzaniga MS; Shadmehr R
    J Neurophysiol; 2003 Jan; 89(1):168-76. PubMed ID: 12522169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Interlimb differences in visuomotor and dynamic adaptation during targeted reaching in children.
    Bagesteiro LB; Lima KO; Wang J
    Hum Mov Sci; 2021 Jun; 77():102788. PubMed ID: 33798930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Handedness can be explained by a serial hybrid control scheme.
    Yadav V; Sainburg RL
    Neuroscience; 2014 Oct; 278():385-96. PubMed ID: 25173152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evidence for a dynamic-dominance hypothesis of handedness.
    Sainburg RL
    Exp Brain Res; 2002 Jan; 142(2):241-58. PubMed ID: 11807578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Lateralization of motor adaptation reveals independence in control of trajectory and steady-state position.
    Duff SV; Sainburg RL
    Exp Brain Res; 2007 Jun; 179(4):551-61. PubMed ID: 17171336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Decline in motor prediction in elderly subjects: right versus left arm differences in mentally simulated motor actions.
    Skoura X; Personnier P; Vinter A; Pozzo T; Papaxanthis C
    Cortex; 2008 Oct; 44(9):1271-8. PubMed ID: 18761141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Different Control Strategies Drive Interlimb Differences in Performance and Adaptation during Reaching Movements in Novel Dynamics.
    Córdova Bulens D; Cluff T; Blondeau L; Moore RT; Lefèvre P; Crevecoeur F
    eNeuro; 2023 Apr; 10(4):. PubMed ID: 36941058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The symmetry of interlimb transfer depends on workspace locations.
    Wang J; Sainburg RL
    Exp Brain Res; 2006 Apr; 170(4):464-71. PubMed ID: 16328262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Handedness: dominant arm advantages in control of limb dynamics.
    Bagesteiro LB; Sainburg RL
    J Neurophysiol; 2002 Nov; 88(5):2408-21. PubMed ID: 12424282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Persistence of motor adaptation during constrained, multi-joint, arm movements.
    Scheidt RA; Reinkensmeyer DJ; Conditt MA; Rymer WZ; Mussa-Ivaldi FA
    J Neurophysiol; 2000 Aug; 84(2):853-62. PubMed ID: 10938312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reach adaptation and final position control amid environmental uncertainty after stroke.
    Scheidt RA; Stoeckmann T
    J Neurophysiol; 2007 Apr; 97(4):2824-36. PubMed ID: 17267755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Muscle effort is best minimized by the right-dominant arm in the gravity field.
    Poirier G; Papaxanthis C; Mourey F; Lebigre M; Gaveau J
    J Neurophysiol; 2022 Apr; 127(4):1117-1126. PubMed ID: 35353617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Transfer of learning between the arms during bimanual reaching.
    Harley LR; Prilutsky BI
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2012; 2012():6785-8. PubMed ID: 23367487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Nondominant-to-dominant hand interference in bimanual movements is facilitated by gradual visuomotor perturbation.
    Kagerer FA
    Neuroscience; 2016 Mar; 318():94-103. PubMed ID: 26779835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Lateralized sensitivity of motor memories to the kinematics of the opposite arm reveals functional specialization during bimanual actions.
    Yokoi A; Hirashima M; Nozaki D
    J Neurosci; 2014 Jul; 34(27):9141-51. PubMed ID: 24990934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Interlimb differences in coordination of unsupported reaching movements.
    Schaffer JE; Sainburg RL
    Neuroscience; 2017 May; 350():54-64. PubMed ID: 28344068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.