These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

268 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17611824)

  • 1. Comparison of ultrasonographic cervical length and the Bishop score in predicting successful labor induction.
    Gómez Laencina AM; Sánchez FG; Gimenez JH; Martínez MS; Valverde Martínez JA; Vizcaíno VM
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2007; 86(7):799-804. PubMed ID: 17611824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Preinduction sonographic measurement of cervical length in the prediction of successful induction of labor.
    Pandis GK; Papageorghiou AT; Ramanathan VG; Thompson MO; Nicolaides KH
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2001 Dec; 18(6):623-8. PubMed ID: 11844202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Transvaginal sonographic measurement of cervical length vs. Bishop score in labor induction at term: tolerability and prediction of Cesarean delivery.
    Tan PC; Vallikkannu N; Suguna S; Quek KF; Hassan J
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2007 May; 29(5):568-73. PubMed ID: 17444553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of the Bishop score, body mass index and transvaginal cervical length in predicting the success of labor induction.
    Uyar Y; Erbay G; Demir BC; Baytur Y
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Sep; 280(3):357-62. PubMed ID: 19130065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Transvaginal sonography of the uterine cervix prior to labor induction.
    Gabriel R; Darnaud T; Chalot F; Gonzalez N; Leymarie F; Quereux C
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Mar; 19(3):254-7. PubMed ID: 11896946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bishop Score vs. ultrasound cervical length in the prediction of cervical ripening success and vaginal delivery in nulliparous women.
    Kehila M; Bougmiza I; Ben Hmid R; Abdelfatteh W; Mahjoub S; Channoufi MB
    Minerva Ginecol; 2015 Dec; 67(6):499-505. PubMed ID: 25964145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bishop score and ultrasound assessment of the cervix for prediction of time to onset of labor and time to delivery in prolonged pregnancy.
    Strobel E; Sladkevicius P; Rovas L; De Smet F; Karlsson ED; Valentin L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Sep; 28(3):298-305. PubMed ID: 16817173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sonographic cervical length as a predictor of type of delivery after induced labor.
    Gómez-Laencina AM; García CP; Asensio LV; Ponce JA; Martínez MS; Martínez-Vizcaíno V
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Jun; 285(6):1523-8. PubMed ID: 22198844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sonographic cervical length measurement before labor induction in term nulliparous women.
    Daskalakis G; Thomakos N; Hatziioannou L; Mesogitis S; Papantoniou N; Antsaklis A
    Fetal Diagn Ther; 2006; 21(1):34-8. PubMed ID: 16354972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of digital and ultrasonographic examination of the cervix in predicting time interval from induction to delivery in women with a low Bishop score.
    Rozenberg P; Chevret S; Chastang C; Ville Y
    BJOG; 2005 Feb; 112(2):192-6. PubMed ID: 15663583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Prediction of successful induction of labor: comparison of transvaginal ultrasonography and the Bishop score.
    Gonen R; Degani S; Ron A
    Eur J Ultrasound; 1998 Aug; 7(3):183-7. PubMed ID: 9700213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Transvaginal ultrasound measurement of cervical length in the supine and upright positions versus Bishop score in predicting successful induction of labor at term.
    Meijer-Hoogeveen M; Roos C; Arabin B; Stoutenbeek P; Visser GH
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Feb; 33(2):213-20. PubMed ID: 19173229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Transvaginal ultrasonography for cervical assessment before induction of labor.
    Yang SH; Roh CR; Kim JH
    J Ultrasound Med; 2004 Mar; 23(3):375-82, quiz 384-5. PubMed ID: 15055785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pre-induction sonographic assessment of the cervix in the prediction of successful induction of labour in nulliparous women.
    Keepanasseril A; Suri V; Bagga R; Aggarwal N
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2007 Oct; 47(5):389-93. PubMed ID: 17877596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Transvaginal ultrasonographic cervical measurement in predicting failed labor induction and cesarean delivery for failure to progress in nulliparous women.
    Park KH
    J Korean Med Sci; 2007 Aug; 22(4):722-7. PubMed ID: 17728517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Variables that predict the success of labor induction.
    Bueno B; San-Frutos L; Salazar F; Pérez-Medina T; Engels V; Archilla B; Izquierdo F; Bajo J
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2005 Nov; 84(11):1093-7. PubMed ID: 16232178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ultrasound assessment of fetal head-perineum distance before induction of labor.
    Eggebø TM; Heien C; Økland I; Gjessing LK; Romundstad P; Salvesen KA
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Aug; 32(2):199-204. PubMed ID: 18528923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Does ultrasound examination when the cervix is unfavorable improve the prediction of failed labor induction?
    Roman H; Verspyck E; Vercoustre L; Degre S; Col JY; Firmin JM; Caron P; Marpeau L
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Apr; 23(4):357-62. PubMed ID: 15065185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The value of ultrasound in the prediction of successful induction of labor.
    Rane SM; Guirgis RR; Higgins B; Nicolaides KH
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Oct; 24(5):538-49. PubMed ID: 15386612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Transvaginal ultrasonographic cervical measurement as a predictor of successful labor induction.
    Ware V; Raynor BD
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 May; 182(5):1030-2. PubMed ID: 10819818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.