367 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17612021)
1. Doc resistance. Quality reporting initiative may be too cumbersome.
Lubell J
Mod Healthc; 2007 May; 37(22):10-1. PubMed ID: 17612021
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Physician incentives for adoption and meaningful use of electronic health records.
Roswell RH
J Okla State Med Assoc; 2010 Sep; 103(9):420-2. PubMed ID: 21162419
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Integration demonstration. The CMS' latest pay-for-performance initiative will test the power of integrated delivery systems to alter doc practice patterns.
Romano M
Mod Healthc; 2005 Oct; 35(44):6-7, 16, 1. PubMed ID: 16300201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. CMS tries cash this time. New quality reporting program has financial incentives.
Lubell J
Mod Healthc; 2007 Apr; 37(15):12-3. PubMed ID: 17494350
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. New CMS 'error' rule has access implications.
Hosp Case Manag; 2007 Nov; 15(11):173-5. PubMed ID: 17982835
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Making PQRI work in a nephrology practice.
Owens H
Nephrol News Issues; 2009 Jun; 23(7):16-8. PubMed ID: 19585806
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Pay-for-performance: Medicare's new reimbursement twist.
Miller-Meeks M
Iowa Med; 2007; 97(1):8. PubMed ID: 17444298
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Quality measures gain importance as CMS moves to value-based purchasing.
Hosp Case Manag; 2007 Aug; 15(8):119-21. PubMed ID: 17691253
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Hospitals must overcome physician resistance before P4P can take root.
Health Care Strateg Manage; 2006 Jul; 24(7):1, 14-6. PubMed ID: 16903396
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Weak prospects. Federal Medicaid P4P proposal has skeptics.
Lubell J
Mod Healthc; 2007 Feb; 37(8):10. PubMed ID: 17348345
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Money matters...but not when it comes to improving quality: study.
Becker C
Mod Healthc; 2007 Jun; 37(24):9. PubMed ID: 17608111
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Medicare evaluates pay-for-performance.
Fine A
Manag Care Q; 2006; 14(1):22-3. PubMed ID: 17590974
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Patient safety and surgeons: why the resistance?
Hoover EL
Arch Surg; 2007 Dec; 142(12):1127-8. PubMed ID: 18086977
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. VBP: considering the worst case scenario.
Alexander J
Healthc Financ Manage; 2008 Jan; 62(1):32-3. PubMed ID: 18351248
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Piloting does to EMRs. Physicians hope CMS' EHR bonus project portends a broader shift in reimbursement priorities.
Raths D
Healthc Inform; 2008 Feb; 25(2):38, 40. PubMed ID: 18320877
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Pay-for-performance incentives: are you missing out on revenue?
Hosp Peer Rev; 2005 Oct; 30(10):133-6. PubMed ID: 16218299
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Insurers look to CMS' lead. Major players likely to follow rule on preventable errors.
Vesely R
Mod Healthc; 2007 Sep; 37(35):20. PubMed ID: 17960703
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Performance anxiey. Is it too late for physicians to set their own rules on pay-for-performance?
Romano M
Mod Healthc; 2005 May; 35(22):6-7, 14, 1. PubMed ID: 15938484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. CMS rule raises bar on quality.
Hosp Peer Rev; 2011 Sep; 36(9):97-9. PubMed ID: 21942141
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Payment for performance: ready or not, here it comes.
Hoover EL
J Natl Med Assoc; 2007 Feb; 99(2):120-2. PubMed ID: 17366944
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
