These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
362 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17612021)
1. Doc resistance. Quality reporting initiative may be too cumbersome. Lubell J Mod Healthc; 2007 May; 37(22):10-1. PubMed ID: 17612021 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Physician incentives for adoption and meaningful use of electronic health records. Roswell RH J Okla State Med Assoc; 2010 Sep; 103(9):420-2. PubMed ID: 21162419 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Integration demonstration. The CMS' latest pay-for-performance initiative will test the power of integrated delivery systems to alter doc practice patterns. Romano M Mod Healthc; 2005 Oct; 35(44):6-7, 16, 1. PubMed ID: 16300201 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. CMS tries cash this time. New quality reporting program has financial incentives. Lubell J Mod Healthc; 2007 Apr; 37(15):12-3. PubMed ID: 17494350 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. New CMS 'error' rule has access implications. Hosp Case Manag; 2007 Nov; 15(11):173-5. PubMed ID: 17982835 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Making PQRI work in a nephrology practice. Owens H Nephrol News Issues; 2009 Jun; 23(7):16-8. PubMed ID: 19585806 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Pay-for-performance: Medicare's new reimbursement twist. Miller-Meeks M Iowa Med; 2007; 97(1):8. PubMed ID: 17444298 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Quality measures gain importance as CMS moves to value-based purchasing. Hosp Case Manag; 2007 Aug; 15(8):119-21. PubMed ID: 17691253 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Hospitals must overcome physician resistance before P4P can take root. Health Care Strateg Manage; 2006 Jul; 24(7):1, 14-6. PubMed ID: 16903396 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Weak prospects. Federal Medicaid P4P proposal has skeptics. Lubell J Mod Healthc; 2007 Feb; 37(8):10. PubMed ID: 17348345 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Money matters...but not when it comes to improving quality: study. Becker C Mod Healthc; 2007 Jun; 37(24):9. PubMed ID: 17608111 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Medicare evaluates pay-for-performance. Fine A Manag Care Q; 2006; 14(1):22-3. PubMed ID: 17590974 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Patient safety and surgeons: why the resistance? Hoover EL Arch Surg; 2007 Dec; 142(12):1127-8. PubMed ID: 18086977 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. VBP: considering the worst case scenario. Alexander J Healthc Financ Manage; 2008 Jan; 62(1):32-3. PubMed ID: 18351248 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Piloting does to EMRs. Physicians hope CMS' EHR bonus project portends a broader shift in reimbursement priorities. Raths D Healthc Inform; 2008 Feb; 25(2):38, 40. PubMed ID: 18320877 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Pay-for-performance incentives: are you missing out on revenue? Hosp Peer Rev; 2005 Oct; 30(10):133-6. PubMed ID: 16218299 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Insurers look to CMS' lead. Major players likely to follow rule on preventable errors. Vesely R Mod Healthc; 2007 Sep; 37(35):20. PubMed ID: 17960703 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Performance anxiey. Is it too late for physicians to set their own rules on pay-for-performance? Romano M Mod Healthc; 2005 May; 35(22):6-7, 14, 1. PubMed ID: 15938484 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Payment for performance: ready or not, here it comes. Hoover EL J Natl Med Assoc; 2007 Feb; 99(2):120-2. PubMed ID: 17366944 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]