322 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17613120)
1. Detection of feigned cognitive dysfunction using special malinger tests: a simulation study in naïve and coached malingerers.
Jelicic M; Merckelbach H; Candel I; Geraerts E
Int J Neurosci; 2007 Aug; 117(8):1185-92. PubMed ID: 17613120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Detecting coached feigning using the Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM) and the Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology (SIMS).
Jelicic M; Ceunen E; Peters MJ; Merckelbach H
J Clin Psychol; 2011 Sep; 67(9):850-5. PubMed ID: 21503898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diagnostic accuracy of the Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology (SIMS) in detecting instructed malingering.
Merckelbach H; Smith GP
Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2003 Mar; 18(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 14591466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of coaching on detection of malingering on the California Verbal Learning Test.
Coleman RD; Rapport LJ; Millis SR; Ricker JH; Farchione TJ
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 1998 Apr; 20(2):201-10. PubMed ID: 9777474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Detection of malingering: validation of the Structured Inventory of Malingered Symptomatology (SIMS).
Smith GP; Burger GK
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1997; 25(2):183-9. PubMed ID: 9213290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Use of the CBDI to detect malingering when malingerers do their "homework".
Borckardt JJ; Engum ES; Lambert EW; Nash M; Bracy OL; Ray EC
Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2003 Jan; 18(1):57-69. PubMed ID: 14591478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Utility of the structured inventory of malingered symptomatology in identifying persons motivated to malinger psychopathology.
Edens JF; Otto RK; Dwyer T
J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1999; 27(3):387-96. PubMed ID: 10509938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Detecting symptom- and test-coached simulators with the test of memory malingering.
Powell MR; Gfeller JD; Hendricks BL; Sharland M
Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2004 Aug; 19(5):693-702. PubMed ID: 15271412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Detecting neuropsychological malingering: effects of coaching and information.
Dunn TM; Shear PK; Howe S; Ris MD
Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2003 Mar; 18(2):121-34. PubMed ID: 14591464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparing student and patient simulated malingerers' performance on standard neuropsychological measures to detect feigned cognitive deficits.
Haines ME; Norris MP
Clin Neuropsychol; 2001 May; 15(2):171-82. PubMed ID: 11528539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Deterring malingered psychopathology: The effect of warning simulating malingerers.
King J; Sullivan KA
Behav Sci Law; 2009; 27(1):35-49. PubMed ID: 19156679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Detection of feigned ADHD in college students.
Sollman MJ; Ranseen JD; Berry DT
Psychol Assess; 2010 Jun; 22(2):325-35. PubMed ID: 20528060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cognitive underperformance and symptom over-reporting in a mixed psychiatric sample.
Dandachi-FitzGerald B; Ponds RW; Peters MJ; Merckelbach H
Clin Neuropsychol; 2011 Jul; 25(5):812-28. PubMed ID: 21756211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Detecting faked psychopathology: a comparison of two tests to detect malingered psychopathology using a simulation design.
Sullivan K; King J
Psychiatry Res; 2010 Mar; 176(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 20116861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effects of motivation, coaching, and knowledge of neuropsychology on the simulated malingering of head injury.
Erdal K
Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2004 Jan; 19(1):73-88. PubMed ID: 14670381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Differential vulnerability between postconcussion self-report and objective malingering tests in identifying simulated mild head injury.
Martin RC; Hayes JS; Gouvier WD
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 1996 Apr; 18(2):265-75. PubMed ID: 8780961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Detection of malingering in psychiatric unit and general population prison inmates: a comparison of the PAI, SIMS, and SIRS.
Edens JF; Poythress NG; Watkins-Clay MM
J Pers Assess; 2007 Feb; 88(1):33-42. PubMed ID: 17266412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of three tests to detect feigned amnesia: the effects of feedback and the measurement of response latency.
Bolan B; Foster JK; Schmand B; Bolan S
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2002 Apr; 24(2):154-67. PubMed ID: 11992198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The predictive capacity of the MMPI-2 and PAI validity scales and indexes to detect coached and uncoached feigning.
Bagby RM; Nicholson RA; Bacchiochi JR; Ryder AG; Bury AS
J Pers Assess; 2002 Feb; 78(1):69-86. PubMed ID: 11936213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Efficacy of the full and abbreviated forms of the Portland Digit Recognition Test: vulnerability to coaching.
Gunstad J; Suhr JA
Clin Neuropsychol; 2001 Aug; 15(3):397-404. PubMed ID: 11778778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
