These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17613645)

  • 1. A unified approach for assessing agreement for continuous and categorical data.
    Lin L; Hedayat AS; Wu W
    J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(4):629-52. PubMed ID: 17613645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessing intra, inter and total agreement with replicated readings.
    Barnhart HX; Song J; Haber MJ
    Stat Med; 2005 May; 24(9):1371-84. PubMed ID: 15570569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison model for measuring individual agreement.
    Lin L; Hedayat AS; Tang Y
    J Biopharm Stat; 2013 Mar; 23(2):322-45. PubMed ID: 23437942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Overall concordance correlation coefficient for evaluating agreement among multiple observers.
    Barnhart HX; Haber M; Song J
    Biometrics; 2002 Dec; 58(4):1020-7. PubMed ID: 12495158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of concordance correlation coefficient and coefficient of individual agreement in assessing agreement.
    Barnhart HX; Lokhnygina Y; Kosinski AS; Haber M
    J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(4):721-38. PubMed ID: 17613650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A non-parametric approach to estimate the total deviation index for non-normal data.
    Perez-Jaume S; Carrasco JL
    Stat Med; 2015 Nov; 34(25):3318-35. PubMed ID: 26032993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessing interrater agreement from dependent data.
    Williamson JM; Manatunga AK
    Biometrics; 1997 Jun; 53(2):707-14. PubMed ID: 9192459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing inter-rater reliability when the raters are fixed: Two concepts and two estimates.
    Rousson V
    Biom J; 2011 May; 53(3):477-90. PubMed ID: 21425184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of concordance correlation coefficient estimating approaches with skewed data.
    Carrasco JL; Jover L; King TS; Chinchilli VM
    J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(4):673-84. PubMed ID: 17613647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Homogeneity score test of AC
    Honda C; Ohyama T
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2020 Feb; 20(1):20. PubMed ID: 32020851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Overall indices for assessing agreement among multiple raters.
    Jang JH; Manatunga AK; Taylor AT; Long Q
    Stat Med; 2018 Dec; 37(28):4200-4215. PubMed ID: 30062738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A class of repeated measures concordance correlation coefficients.
    King TS; Chinchilli VM; Wang KL; Carrasco JL
    J Biopharm Stat; 2007; 17(4):653-72. PubMed ID: 17613646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluating the effects of rater and subject factors on measures of association.
    Nelson KP; Mitani AA; Edwards D
    Biom J; 2018 May; 60(3):639-656. PubMed ID: 29349801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Modeling concordance correlation via GEE to evaluate reproducibility.
    Barnhart HX; Williamson JM
    Biometrics; 2001 Sep; 57(3):931-40. PubMed ID: 11550947
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessing the influence of rater and subject characteristics on measures of agreement for ordinal ratings.
    Nelson KP; Mitani AA; Edwards D
    Stat Med; 2017 Sep; 36(20):3181-3199. PubMed ID: 28612356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Midwives' visual interpretation of intrapartum cardiotocographs: intra- and inter-observer agreement.
    Devane D; Lalor J
    J Adv Nurs; 2005 Oct; 52(2):133-41. PubMed ID: 16164474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Concordance correlation coefficients estimated by generalized estimating equations and variance components for longitudinal repeated measurements.
    Tsai MY
    Stat Med; 2017 Apr; 36(8):1319-1333. PubMed ID: 28105775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Inter-rater reliability of categorical versus continuous scoring of fish vitality: Does it affect the utility of the reflex action mortality predictor (RAMP) approach?
    Meeremans P; Yochum N; Kochzius M; Ampe B; Tuyttens FAM; Uhlmann SS
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0179092. PubMed ID: 28704390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Distinguishability and agreement with continuous data.
    Carrasco JL; Caceres A; Escaramis G; Jover L
    Stat Med; 2014 Jan; 33(1):117-28. PubMed ID: 23825013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of individual agreements with repeated measurements based on generalized confidence intervals.
    Quiroz J; Burdick RK
    J Biopharm Stat; 2009; 19(2):345-59. PubMed ID: 19212885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.