BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

283 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17614511)

  • 1. Sentential, lexical, and acoustic effects on the perception of word boundaries.
    Mattys SL; Melhorn JF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Jul; 122(1):554-67. PubMed ID: 17614511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Acoustic cues to lexical segmentation: a study of resynthesized speech.
    Spitzer SM; Liss JM; Mattys SL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Dec; 122(6):3678-87. PubMed ID: 18247775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Phonotactic regularities in the segmentation of spoken Italian.
    Tagliapietra L; Fanari R; De Candia C; Tabossi P
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Feb; 62(2):392-415. PubMed ID: 18609378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of syntactic expectations on speech segmentation.
    Mattys SL; Melhorn JF; White L
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2007 Aug; 33(4):960-77. PubMed ID: 17683240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Is there pain in champagne? Semantic involvement of words within words during sense-making.
    van Alphen PM; van Berkum JJ
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Nov; 22(11):2618-26. PubMed ID: 19702463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The use of phrase-level prosodic information in lexical segmentation: evidence from word-spotting experiments in Korean.
    Kim S; Cho T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 May; 125(5):3373-86. PubMed ID: 19425677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Integration of multiple speech segmentation cues: a hierarchical framework.
    Mattys SL; White L; Melhorn JF
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2005 Nov; 134(4):477-500. PubMed ID: 16316287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Recognizing speech under a processing load: dissociating energetic from informational factors.
    Mattys SL; Brooks J; Cooke M
    Cogn Psychol; 2009 Nov; 59(3):203-43. PubMed ID: 19423089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Experience with a second language affects the use of fundamental frequency in speech segmentation.
    Tremblay A; Namjoshi J; Spinelli E; Broersma M; Cho T; Kim S; Martínez-García MT; Connell K
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(7):e0181709. PubMed ID: 28738093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Vocabulary influences older and younger listeners' processing of dysarthric speech.
    McAuliffe MJ; Gibson EM; Kerr SE; Anderson T; LaShell PJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Aug; 134(2):1358-68. PubMed ID: 23927132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Processing reduced word-forms in speech perception using probabilistic knowledge about speech production.
    Mitterer H; McQueen JM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Feb; 35(1):244-63. PubMed ID: 19170486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A study of regressive place assimilation in spontaneous speech and its implications for spoken word recognition.
    Dilley LC; Pitt MA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Oct; 122(4):2340-53. PubMed ID: 17902869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Perception of clear fricatives by normal-hearing and simulated hearing-impaired listeners.
    Maniwa K; Jongman A; Wade T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Feb; 123(2):1114-25. PubMed ID: 18247912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effects of stress and statistical cues on continuous speech segmentation: an event-related brain potential study.
    Cunillera T; Toro JM; Sebastián-Gallés N; Rodríguez-Fornells A
    Brain Res; 2006 Dec; 1123(1):168-78. PubMed ID: 17064672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Suprasegmental lexical stress cues in visual speech can guide spoken-word recognition.
    Jesse A; McQueen JM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(4):793-808. PubMed ID: 24134065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of training on the acoustic phonetic representation of synthetic speech.
    Francis AL; Nusbaum HC; Fenn K
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2007 Dec; 50(6):1445-65. PubMed ID: 18055767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Adapting to suprasegmental lexical stress errors in foreign-accented speech.
    Reinisch E; Weber A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):1165-76. PubMed ID: 22894235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effects of contextual strength on phonetic identification in younger and older listeners.
    Abada SH; Baum SR; Titone D
    Exp Aging Res; 2008; 34(3):232-50. PubMed ID: 18568981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Disambiguating durational cues for speech segmentation.
    Monaghan P; White L; Merkx MM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jul; 134(1):EL45-51. PubMed ID: 23862905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The neural bases of the lexical effect: an fMRI investigation.
    Myers EB; Blumstein SE
    Cereb Cortex; 2008 Feb; 18(2):278-88. PubMed ID: 17504782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.