These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

282 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17614511)

  • 41. Infants use prosodically conditioned acoustic-phonetic cues to extract words from speech.
    Johnson EK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Jun; 123(6):EL144-8. PubMed ID: 18537301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Syllabic strength and lexical boundary decisions in the perception of hypokinetic dysarthric speech.
    Liss JM; Spitzer S; Caviness JN; Adler C; Edwards B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Oct; 104(4):2457-66. PubMed ID: 10491707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The impact of strong assimilation on the perception of connected speech.
    Gaskell MG; Snoeren ND
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2008 Dec; 34(6):1632-47. PubMed ID: 19045997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Perceptual compensation when isolated test words are heard in room reverberation.
    Watkins AJ; Raimond AP
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2013; 787():193-201. PubMed ID: 23716224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Can hearing puter activate pupil? Phonological competition and the processing of reduced spoken words in spontaneous conversations.
    Brouwer S; Mitterer H; Huettig F
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(11):2193-220. PubMed ID: 22934784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Modeling the contribution of phonotactic cues to the problem of word segmentation.
    Blanchard D; Heinz J; Golinkoff R
    J Child Lang; 2010 Jun; 37(3):487-511. PubMed ID: 20307346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Lexical information drives perceptual learning of distorted speech: evidence from the comprehension of noise-vocoded sentences.
    Davis MH; Johnsrude IS; Hervais-Adelman A; Taylor K; McGettigan C
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2005 May; 134(2):222-41. PubMed ID: 15869347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Top-down effects of syntactic sentential context on phonetic processing.
    Fox NP; Blumstein SE
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2016 May; 42(5):730-41. PubMed ID: 26689310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Interactions between distal speech rate, linguistic knowledge, and speech environment.
    Morrill T; Baese-Berk M; Heffner C; Dilley L
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2015 Oct; 22(5):1451-7. PubMed ID: 25794478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Effects of lexical ambiguity, frequency, and acoustic details in auditory perception.
    Sanker C
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Jan; 81(1):323-343. PubMed ID: 30324298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Greater sensitivity to prosodic goodness in non-native than in native listeners (L).
    Cutler A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Jun; 125(6):3522-5. PubMed ID: 19507933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. The role of pause cues in language learning: the emergence of event-related potentials related to sequence processing.
    Mueller JL; Bahlmann J; Friederici AD
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 May; 20(5):892-905. PubMed ID: 18201121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53.
    Lee Y; Kaiser E; Goldstein L
    Lang Speech; 2020 Sep; 63(3):526-549. PubMed ID: 31385552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Speaking rate from proximal and distal contexts is used during word segmentation.
    Reinisch E; Jesse A; McQueen JM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Jun; 37(3):978-96. PubMed ID: 21517213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The time course of perception of coarticulation.
    Beddor PS; McGowan KB; Boland JE; Coetzee AW; Brasher A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Apr; 133(4):2350-66. PubMed ID: 23556601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Effects of seeing the interlocutor on the production of prosodic contrasts (L).
    Cvejic E; Kim J; Davis C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Feb; 131(2):1011-4. PubMed ID: 22352476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The perception of prominence patterns.
    Kohler KJ
    Phonetica; 2008; 65(4):257-69. PubMed ID: 19221454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The effect of voice onset time differences on lexical access in Dutch.
    van Alphen PM; McQueen JM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2006 Feb; 32(1):178-96. PubMed ID: 16478335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Testing the protracted lexical restructuring hypothesis: the effects of position and acoustic-phonetic clarity on sensitivity to mispronunciations in children and adults.
    Bowey JA; Hirakis E
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2006 Sep; 95(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 16546204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The impact of attention load on the use of statistical information and coarticulation as speech segmentation cues.
    Fernandes T; Kolinsky R; Ventura P
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Aug; 72(6):1522-32. PubMed ID: 20675798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.