157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17614872)
1. The unexpected empirical consensus among consensus methods.
Regenwetter M; Kim A; Kantor A; Ho MH
Psychol Sci; 2007 Jul; 18(7):629-35. PubMed ID: 17614872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sophisticated approval voting, ignorance priors, and plurality heuristics: a behavioral social choice analysis in a Thurstonian framework.
Regenwetter M; Ho MH; Tsetlin I
Psychol Rev; 2007 Oct; 114(4):994-1014. PubMed ID: 17907870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Structural equation modeling of approval voting data.
Tsai RC
Behav Res Methods; 2010 Aug; 42(3):798-808. PubMed ID: 20805603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Neural voting machines.
Richards W; Seung HS; Pickard G
Neural Netw; 2006 Oct; 19(8):1161-7. PubMed ID: 16989984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The simplest complete model of choice response time: linear ballistic accumulation.
Brown SD; Heathcote A
Cogn Psychol; 2008 Nov; 57(3):153-78. PubMed ID: 18243170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An empirical assessment of the form of utility functions.
Kirby KN
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Mar; 37(2):461-76. PubMed ID: 21355669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Physiological evidence for response inhibition in choice reaction time tasks.
Burle B; Vidal F; Tandonnet C; Hasbroucq T
Brain Cogn; 2004 Nov; 56(2):153-64. PubMed ID: 15518932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Making decisions through a distributed consensus.
Cisek P
Curr Opin Neurobiol; 2012 Dec; 22(6):927-36. PubMed ID: 22683275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Risky choice and Weber's Law.
Kacelnik A; Brito e Abreu F
J Theor Biol; 1998 Sep; 194(2):289-98. PubMed ID: 9778440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intertemporal choice--toward an integrative framework.
Berns GS; Laibson D; Loewenstein G
Trends Cogn Sci; 2007 Nov; 11(11):482-8. PubMed ID: 17980645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [The origin of informed consent].
Mallardi V
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 2005 Oct; 25(5):312-27. PubMed ID: 16602332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Social learning and health plan choice.
Sorensen AT
Rand J Econ; 2006; 37(4):1-29. PubMed ID: 17824132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Judgment and decision making.
Mellers BA; Schwartz A; Cooke AD
Annu Rev Psychol; 1998; 49():447-77. PubMed ID: 9496629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Issues or Identity? Cognitive Foundations of Voter Choice.
Jenke L; Huettel SA
Trends Cogn Sci; 2016 Nov; 20(11):794-804. PubMed ID: 27769726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Think different: the merits of unconscious thought in preference development and decision making.
Dijksterhuis A
J Pers Soc Psychol; 2004 Nov; 87(5):586-98. PubMed ID: 15535773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Preference reversal in multiattribute choice.
Tsetsos K; Usher M; Chater N
Psychol Rev; 2010 Oct; 117(4):1275-93. PubMed ID: 21038979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Systematic mistakes are likely in bounded optimal decision-making systems.
Livnat A; Pippenger N
J Theor Biol; 2008 Feb; 250(3):410-23. PubMed ID: 18022645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Perspectives on Preference Aggregation.
Regenwetter M
Perspect Psychol Sci; 2009 Jul; 4(4):403-7. PubMed ID: 26158988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Neural mechanisms of decision making].
Funahashi S
Brain Nerve; 2008 Sep; 60(9):1017-27. PubMed ID: 18807936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Are prosocials unique in their egalitarianism? The pursuit of equality in outcomes among individualists.
Van den Bergh B; Dewitte S; De Cremer D
Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2006 Sep; 32(9):1219-31. PubMed ID: 16902241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
