These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

104 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17614873)

  • 1. Choosing between adaptive agents: some unexpected implications of level of scrutiny.
    Kareev Y; Avrahami J
    Psychol Sci; 2007 Jul; 18(7):636-41. PubMed ID: 17614873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impaired strategic decision making in schizophrenia.
    Kim H; Lee D; Shin YM; Chey J
    Brain Res; 2007 Nov; 1180():90-100. PubMed ID: 17905200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Rivals in the dark: how competition influences search in decisions under uncertainty.
    Phillips ND; Hertwig R; Kareev Y; Avrahami J
    Cognition; 2014 Oct; 133(1):104-19. PubMed ID: 25010397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. People's intuitions about intuitive insight and intuitive choice.
    Inbar Y; Cone J; Gilovich T
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2010 Aug; 99(2):232-47. PubMed ID: 20658841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Compromised decision making and the effects of manipulating physical states on human judgments.
    De Los Reyes A; Aldao A; Kundey SM; Lee BG; Molina S
    J Clin Psychol; 2012 Jan; 68(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 22105558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hidden profiles and concealed information: strategic information sharing and use in group decision making.
    Toma C; Butera F
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2009 Jun; 35(6):793-806. PubMed ID: 19332434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The format in which uncertainty information is presented affects decision biases.
    Gottlieb DA; Weiss T; Chapman GB
    Psychol Sci; 2007 Mar; 18(3):240-6. PubMed ID: 17444921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Choosing the greater of two goods: neural currencies for valuation and decision making.
    Sugrue LP; Corrado GS; Newsome WT
    Nat Rev Neurosci; 2005 May; 6(5):363-75. PubMed ID: 15832198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Altered adaptive but not veridical decision-making in substance dependent individuals.
    Verdejo-García A; Vilar-López R; Pérez-García M; Podell K; Goldberg E
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 2006 Jan; 12(1):90-9. PubMed ID: 16433948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. From biophysics to cognition: reward-dependent adaptive choice behavior.
    Soltani A; Wang XJ
    Curr Opin Neurobiol; 2008 Apr; 18(2):209-16. PubMed ID: 18678255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reinforcement learning and decision making in monkeys during a competitive game.
    Lee D; Conroy ML; McGreevy BP; Barraclough DJ
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 Dec; 22(1):45-58. PubMed ID: 15561500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Achieving what cannot be done: coping with the time constants in a dynamic decision task by doing something else.
    Brehmer B; Nählinder S
    Scand J Psychol; 2007 Oct; 48(5):359-65. PubMed ID: 17877550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. When goal orientations collide: effects of learning and performance orientation on team adaptability in response to workload imbalance.
    Porter CO; Webb JW; Gogus CI
    J Appl Psychol; 2010 Sep; 95(5):935-43. PubMed ID: 20718514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The perceived diversity heuristic: the case of pseudodiversity.
    Ayal S; Zakay D
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2009 Mar; 96(3):559-73. PubMed ID: 19254103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Relationships between affective states and decision-making.
    Werner NS; Duschek S; Schandry R
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2009 Dec; 74(3):259-65. PubMed ID: 19808059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Decisions from experience: why small samples?
    Hertwig R; Pleskac TJ
    Cognition; 2010 May; 115(2):225-37. PubMed ID: 20092816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Correspondence bias in performance evaluation: why grade inflation works.
    Moore DA; Swift SA; Sharek ZS; Gino F
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2010 Jun; 36(6):843-52. PubMed ID: 20453201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Error rate and outcome predictability affect neural activation in prefrontal cortex and anterior cingulate during decision-making.
    Paulus MP; Hozack N; Frank L; Brown GG
    Neuroimage; 2002 Apr; 15(4):836-46. PubMed ID: 11906224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Reinforcement learning: the good, the bad and the ugly.
    Dayan P; Niv Y
    Curr Opin Neurobiol; 2008 Apr; 18(2):185-96. PubMed ID: 18708140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Adaptive flexibility and maladaptive routines in selecting fast and frugal decision strategies.
    Bröder A; Schiffer S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jul; 32(4):904-18. PubMed ID: 16822156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.