These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17616099)

  • 1. [Mammography screening for all women 50 to 69 years old. Increases longevity--or only duration of suffering? Contra (interview by Waldtraud Paukstadt)].
    Mülhlhauser I
    MMW Fortschr Med; 2007 Feb; 149(8):7. PubMed ID: 17616099
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Mammography screening for all women 50 to 69 years old. Increases longevity--or only duration of suffering? Pro (interview by Waldtraud Paukstadt)].
    Schreer I
    MMW Fortschr Med; 2007 Feb; 149(8):6-7. PubMed ID: 17615690
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Age-related accuracy of screening mammography: how should it be measured?
    Feig SA
    Radiology; 2000 Mar; 214(3):633-40. PubMed ID: 10715022
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Mammography--early detection--insurance coverage as IGeL service?].
    Wigge P
    Rofo; 2003 May; 175(5):608-12. PubMed ID: 12816079
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mammography and breast cancer.
    N Z Med J; 1990 Jun; 103(891):280-1. PubMed ID: 2356059
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Positive predictive value of screening mammography by age and family history of breast cancer.
    Kerlikowske K; Grady D; Barclay J; Sickles EA; Eaton A; Ernster V
    JAMA; 1993 Nov; 270(20):2444-50. PubMed ID: 8230621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Mammography screening is here to stay. Individual screening programs may be more effective].
    Hall P
    Lakartidningen; 2012 Mar 28-Apr 3; 109(13):684-5. PubMed ID: 22530465
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Screening lowers breast cancer mortality. Motivate your patients for mammography].
    Kessler M; Schneider P; Sittek H; Reiser M
    MMW Fortschr Med; 2001 Jul; 143(28-29):32-5. PubMed ID: 11499144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Re: Tumor characteristics and clinical outcome of elderly women with breast cancer.
    Weiss NS
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2001 Jan; 93(1):65; author reply 65-6. PubMed ID: 11136848
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Mammography screening of breast cancer in Tunisia. Results of first experience].
    Kribi L; Sellami D; el Amri A; Mnif N; Ellouze T; Chebbi A; Ben Romdhane K; Hamza R
    Tunis Med; 2003 Jan; 81(1):26-33. PubMed ID: 12708189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mammographic screening: patterns of use and estimated impact on breast carcinoma survival.
    Blanchard K; Colbert JA; Puri D; Weissman J; Moy B; Kopans DB; Kaine EM; Moore RH; Halpern EF; Hughes KS; Tanabe KK; Smith BL; Michaelson JS
    Cancer; 2004 Aug; 101(3):495-507. PubMed ID: 15274062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Assessment of mammography screening and its introduction in Germany in the Statutory Early Diagnosis Program].
    von Fournier D
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1999; 121(3):159-65. PubMed ID: 10209861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mammography in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients.
    Stomper PC; Gelman RS
    Hematol Oncol Clin North Am; 1989 Dec; 3(4):611-40. PubMed ID: 2691492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Role of detection method in predicting breast cancer survival: analysis of randomized screening trials.
    Shen Y; Yang Y; Inoue LY; Munsell MF; Miller AB; Berry DA
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2005 Aug; 97(16):1195-203. PubMed ID: 16106024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Quality assurance in excision of suspected malignant, preoperatively marked and unmarked, breast lesions. A one-year analysis].
    Leinung S; Würl P; Preusse C; Schneider JP; Börner P; Schönfelder M
    Zentralbl Chir; 2000; 125 Suppl 2():182-4. PubMed ID: 11190642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effectiveness of breast cancer screening by mammography in younger women: correction.
    Elwood M; Cox B; Richardson A
    Online J Curr Clin Trials; 1994 Mar; Doc No 121():[385 words; 4 paragraphs]. PubMed ID: 8136940
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Preventive health care, 2001 update: screening mammography among women aged 40-49 years at average risk of breast cancer.
    Ringash J;
    CMAJ; 2001 Feb; 164(4):469-76. PubMed ID: 11233866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A model for determining the effect of mammography service screening.
    Olsen AH; Njor SH; Vejborg I; Schwartz W; Dalgaard P; Jensen MB; Tange UB; Blichert-Toft M; Rank F; Mouridsen H; Lynge E
    Acta Oncol; 2005; 44(2):120-8. PubMed ID: 15788290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Association of recall rates with sensitivity and positive predictive values of screening mammography.
    Yankaskas BC; Cleveland RJ; Schell MJ; Kozar R
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Sep; 177(3):543-9. PubMed ID: 11517044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Detection by screening mammography is a powerful independent predictor of survival in women diagnosed with breast cancer.
    Johnson A; Shekhdar J
    Breast; 2005 Feb; 14(1):79. PubMed ID: 15695088
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.