118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17616413)
21. Universal standardization for dual x-ray absorptiometry: patient and phantom cross-calibration results.
Genant HK; Grampp S; Glüer CC; Faulkner KG; Jergas M; Engelke K; Hagiwara S; Van Kuijk C
J Bone Miner Res; 1994 Oct; 9(10):1503-14. PubMed ID: 7817795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Anomalies in dual energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements of total-body bone mineral during weight change using Lunar, Hologic and Norland instruments.
Tothill P; Laskey MA; Orphanidou CI; van Wijk M
Br J Radiol; 1999 Jul; 72(859):661-9. PubMed ID: 10624323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Cross-calibration of iDXA and Prodigy on spine and femur scans in Korean adults.
Choi YJ; Lee BJ; Lim HC; Chung YS
J Clin Densitom; 2009; 12(4):450-5. PubMed ID: 19815436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Accuracy and precision of 62 bone densitometers using a European Spine Phantom.
Kolta S; Ravaud P; Fechtenbaum J; Dougados M; Roux C
Osteoporos Int; 1999; 10(1):14-9. PubMed ID: 10501774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Dual x-ray absorptiometry forearm software: accuracy and intermachine relationship.
Hagiwara S; Engelke K; Yang SO; Dhillon MS; Guglielmi G; Nelson DL; Genant HK
J Bone Miner Res; 1994 Sep; 9(9):1425-7. PubMed ID: 7817826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Cross-calibration and comparison of variability in 2 bone densitometers in a research setting: the framingham experience.
Gagnon DR; McLean RR; Hannan MT; Cupples LA; Hogan M; Kiel DP
J Clin Densitom; 2010; 13(2):210-8. PubMed ID: 20347371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Monitoring of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurement in clinical practice.
El Maghraoui A; Achemlal L; Bezza A
J Clin Densitom; 2006; 9(3):281-6. PubMed ID: 16931345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of two Hologic DXA systems (QDR 1000 and QDR 4500/A) for in vivo bone mass measurement in the baboon (Papio ursinus).
Mas ID; Biscardi A; Ripamonti U
J Clin Densitom; 2002; 5(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 12357069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Effect of precision on longitudinal follow-up of bone mineral density measurements in elderly women and men.
Lenora J; Akesson K; Gerdhem P
J Clin Densitom; 2010; 13(4):407-12. PubMed ID: 20605500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Replacing DXA scanners: cross-calibration with phantoms may be misleading.
Blake GM
Calcif Tissue Int; 1996 Jul; 59(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 8661987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Assessment of spinal and femoral bone density by dual X-ray absorptiometry: comparison of lunar and hologic instruments.
Pocock NA; Sambrook PN; Nguyen T; Kelly P; Freund J; Eisman JA
J Bone Miner Res; 1992 Sep; 7(9):1081-4. PubMed ID: 1414500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Cross calibration of QDR-2000 and QDR-1000 dual-energy X-ray densitometers for bone mineral and soft-tissue measurements.
Abrahamsen B; Gram J; Hansen TB; Beck-Nielsen H
Bone; 1995 Mar; 16(3):385-90. PubMed ID: 7786643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Precision errors, least significant change, and monitoring time interval in pediatric measurements of bone mineral density, body composition, and mechanostat parameters by GE lunar prodigy.
Jaworski M; Pludowski P
J Clin Densitom; 2013; 16(4):562-9. PubMed ID: 23452871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The effect of room temperature on dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.
Culton NL; Pocock NA
Osteoporos Int; 2003 Apr; 14(2):137-40. PubMed ID: 12730777
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Manufacture and evaluation of a spine phantom used in the cross-calibration of DXA bone densitometry].
Yang DZ; Shang JY; Song WZ; Chen J; Zhu D; Wang WZ
Zhongguo Yi Xue Ke Xue Yuan Xue Bao; 2003 Jun; 25(3):262-6. PubMed ID: 12905736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Short term in vivo precision of whole body composition measurements on the Horizon A densitometer.
Nowitz M; Monahan P
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2018 Apr; 62(2):179-182. PubMed ID: 28755448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Obesity increases precision errors in dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements.
Knapp KM; Welsman JR; Hopkins SJ; Fogelman I; Blake GM
J Clin Densitom; 2012; 15(3):315-9. PubMed ID: 22402120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The importance of spectrum bias on bone density monitoring in clinical practice.
Leslie WD;
Bone; 2006 Aug; 39(2):361-8. PubMed ID: 16537116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Effect of precision error on T-scores and the diagnostic classification of bone status.
Kiebzak GM; Faulkner KG; Wacker W; Hamdy R; Seier E; Watts NB
J Clin Densitom; 2007; 10(3):239-43. PubMed ID: 17451984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Reproducibility of DXA absorptiometry: a model for bone loss estimates.
Fuleihan GE; Testa MA; Angell JE; Porrino N; Leboff MS
J Bone Miner Res; 1995 Jul; 10(7):1004-14. PubMed ID: 7484275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
