128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17616811)
21. Semiautomatic estimation of breast density with DM-Scan software.
Martínez Gómez I; Casals El Busto M; Antón Guirao J; Ruiz Perales F; Llobet Azpitarte R
Radiologia; 2014; 56(5):429-34. PubMed ID: 23489767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Association between mammographic parenchymal pattern classification and incidence of breast cancer.
Threatt B; Norbeck JM; Ullman NS; Kummer R; Roselle P
Cancer; 1980 May; 45(10):2550-6. PubMed ID: 7378990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Accuracy of assigned BI-RADS breast density category definitions.
Nicholson BT; LoRusso AP; Smolkin M; Bovbjerg VE; Petroni GR; Harvey JA
Acad Radiol; 2006 Sep; 13(9):1143-9. PubMed ID: 16935726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Computerized texture analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns of digitized mammograms.
Li H; Giger ML; Olopade OI; Margolis A; Lan L; Chinander MR
Acad Radiol; 2005 Jul; 12(7):863-73. PubMed ID: 16039540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Wolfe's parenchymal pattern and percentage of the breast with mammographic densities: redundant or complementary classifications?
Brisson J; Diorio C; Mâsse B
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2003 Aug; 12(8):728-32. PubMed ID: 12917203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The detection of change in mammographic density.
Stone J; Gunasekara A; Martin LJ; Yaffe M; Minkin S; Boyd NF
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2003 Jul; 12(7):625-30. PubMed ID: 12869401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Mammographic density measured with quantitative computer-aided method: comparison with radiologists' estimates and BI-RADS categories.
Martin KE; Helvie MA; Zhou C; Roubidoux MA; Bailey JE; Paramagul C; Blane CE; Klein KA; Sonnad SS; Chan HP
Radiology; 2006 Sep; 240(3):656-65. PubMed ID: 16857974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Mammographic signs of potential relevance to breast cancer risk: the agreement of radiologists' classification.
Jong R; Fishell E; Little L; Lockwood G; Boyd NF
Eur J Cancer Prev; 1996 Aug; 5(4):281-6. PubMed ID: 8894565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Effect of tamoxifen on mammographic density.
Chow CK; Venzon D; Jones EC; Premkumar A; O'Shaughnessy J; Zujewski J
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2000 Sep; 9(9):917-21. PubMed ID: 11008909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The Tabár classification of mammographic parenchymal patterns.
Gram IT; Funkhouser E; Tabár L
Eur J Radiol; 1997 Feb; 24(2):131-6. PubMed ID: 9097055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Ultrasonographic assessment of breast density.
Kim WH; Moon WK; Kim SJ; Yi A; Yun BL; Cho N; Chang JM; Koo HR; Kim MY; Bae MS; Lee SH; Kim JY; Lee EH
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2013 Apr; 138(3):851-9. PubMed ID: 23568482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Design and clinical validation of a software program for automated measurement of mammographic breast density.
Araújo ALC; Soares HB; Carvalho DF; Mendonça RM; Oliveira AG
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2020 Mar; 20(1):45. PubMed ID: 32122371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Mammographic density and inter-observer variability of pathologic evaluation of core biopsies among women with mammographic abnormalities.
Trocchi P; Ursin G; Kuss O; Ruschke K; Schmidt-Pokrzywniak A; Holzhausen HJ; Löning T; Thomssen C; Böcker W; Kluttig A; Stang A
BMC Cancer; 2012 Nov; 12():554. PubMed ID: 23176326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Automated analysis of mammographic densities and breast carcinoma risk.
Byng JW; Yaffe MJ; Lockwood GA; Little LE; Tritchler DL; Boyd NF
Cancer; 1997 Jul; 80(1):66-74. PubMed ID: 9210710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. How does semi-automated computer-derived CT measure of breast density compare with subjective assessments to assess mean glandular breast density, in patients with breast cancer?
Bansal GJ; Kotugodella S
Br J Radiol; 2014 Dec; 87(1044):20140530. PubMed ID: 25373436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Mammographic breast density and cancer risk: the radiological view.
Yaffe M; Boyd N
Gynecol Endocrinol; 2005 Jul; 21 Suppl 1():6-11. PubMed ID: 16112949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Quantitative assessment of breast density from digitized mammograms into Tabar's patterns.
Jamal N; Ng KH; Looi LM; McLean D; Zulfiqar A; Tan SP; Liew WF; Shantini A; Ranganathan S
Phys Med Biol; 2006 Nov; 51(22):5843-57. PubMed ID: 17068368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Breast cancer screening by mammography in women aged under 50 years in Japan.
Morimoto T; Sasa M; Yamaguchi T; Kondo H; Akaiwa H; Sagara Y
Anticancer Res; 2000; 20(5C):3689-94. PubMed ID: 11268440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Are breast density and bone mineral density independent risk factors for breast cancer?
Kerlikowske K; Shepherd J; Creasman J; Tice JA; Ziv E; Cummings SR
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2005 Mar; 97(5):368-74. PubMed ID: 15741573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Is grading of breast fibrosis with mammography feasible?
Hoeller U; Grzyska B; Lorenzen J; Kuhlmey A; Alberti W; Adam G
Strahlenther Onkol; 2005 May; 181(5):307-12. PubMed ID: 15900426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
