128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17616811)
41. Characterisation of mammographic parenchymal pattern by fractal dimension.
Caldwell CB; Stapleton SJ; Holdsworth DW; Jong RA; Weiser WJ; Cooke G; Yaffe MJ
Phys Med Biol; 1990 Feb; 35(2):235-47. PubMed ID: 2315379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Mammographic parenchymal patterns and quantitative evaluation of mammographic densities: a case-control study.
Wolfe JN; Saftlas AF; Salane M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1987 Jun; 148(6):1087-92. PubMed ID: 3495132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Mammographic breast density changes after 1 year of tibolone use.
Kutlu T; Fiçicioğlu C; Başaran T; Başaran E; Topaloğlu T
Maturitas; 2004 Jun; 48(2):133-6. PubMed ID: 15172087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Endogenous hormone levels, mammographic density, and subsequent risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women.
Tamimi RM; Byrne C; Colditz GA; Hankinson SE
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Aug; 99(15):1178-87. PubMed ID: 17652278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Quantitative assessment of mammographic density and breast cancer risk for Japanese women.
Kotsuma Y; Tamaki Y; Nishimura T; Tsubai M; Ueda S; Shimazu K; Jin Kim S; Miyoshi Y; Tanji Y; Taguchi T; Noguchi S
Breast; 2008 Feb; 17(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 17716895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Computer-assisted diagnosis: the classification of mammographic breast parenchymal patterns.
Tahoces PG; Correa J; Souto M; Gómez L; Vidal JJ
Phys Med Biol; 1995 Jan; 40(1):103-17. PubMed ID: 7708834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Does MRI breast "density" (degree of background enhancement) correlate with mammographic breast density?
Hansen NL; Kuhl CK; Barabasch A; Strobel K; Schrading S
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Aug; 40(2):483-9. PubMed ID: 24446230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. High risk mammographic parenchymal patterns and diet: a case-control study.
Sala E; Warren R; Duffy S; Welch A; Luben R; Day N
Br J Cancer; 2000 Jul; 83(1):121-6. PubMed ID: 10883679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Correlates of high-density mammographic parenchymal patterns by menopausal status in a rural population in Northern Greece.
Riza E; dos Santos Silva I; De Stavola B; Perry N; Karadedou-Zafiriadou E; Linos D; Remoundos DD; Linos A
Eur J Cancer; 2005 Mar; 41(4):590-600. PubMed ID: 15737565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Wolfe mammographic parenchymal patterns and breast cancer risk.
Sickles EA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Feb; 188(2):301-3. PubMed ID: 17242234
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. Reproducibility and consistency in classification of breast parenchymal patterns.
Carlile T; Thompson DJ; Kopecky KJ; Gilbert FI; Krook PM; Present AJ; Russell HW; Threatt BA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1983 Jan; 140(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 6600294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Reversal of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist induced reductions in mammographic densities on stopping treatment.
Gram IT; Ursin G; Spicer DV; Pike MC
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2001 Nov; 10(11):1117-20. PubMed ID: 11700258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Prospective estimation of rates of change in mammographic parenchymal patterns: influence of age and of hormone replacement therapy.
Myles JP; Salmininen T; Duffy SW; Prevost TC; Day NE; Hakama M
Breast; 2004 Feb; 13(1):56-60. PubMed ID: 14759717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Ethnic and geographic differences in mammographic density and their association with breast cancer incidence.
Maskarinec G; Pagano I; Chen Z; Nagata C; Gram IT
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Jul; 104(1):47-56. PubMed ID: 17009106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Introduction of an automated user-independent quantitative volumetric magnetic resonance imaging breast density measurement system using the Dixon sequence: comparison with mammographic breast density assessment.
Wengert GJ; Helbich TH; Vogl WD; Baltzer P; Langs G; Weber M; Bogner W; Gruber S; Trattnig S; Pinker K
Invest Radiol; 2015 Feb; 50(2):73-80. PubMed ID: 25333307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Breast cancer prediction and the Wolfe classification of mammograms.
Carlile T; Kopecky KJ; Thompson DJ; Whitehead JR; Gilbert FI; Present AJ; Threatt BA; Krook P; Hadaway E
JAMA; 1985 Aug 23-30; 254(8):1050-3. PubMed ID: 4021043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. The relationship of "high risk" mammographic patterns to histological risk factors for development of cancer in the human breast.
Arthur JE; Ellis IO; Flowers C; Roebuck E; Elston CW; Blamey RW
Br J Radiol; 1990 Nov; 63(755):845-9. PubMed ID: 2252976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Mammographic features of the breast and breast cancer risk.
Brisson J; Merletti F; Sadowsky NL; Twaddle JA; Morrison AS; Cole P
Am J Epidemiol; 1982 Mar; 115(3):428-37. PubMed ID: 7064977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. A comparison of some anthropometric parameters between an Italian and a UK population: "proof of principle" of a European project using MammoGrid.
Warren R; Thompson D; del Frate C; Cordell M; Highnam R; Tromans C; Warsi I; Ding J; Sala E; Estrella F; Solomonides AE; Odeh M; McClatchey R; Bazzocchi M; Amendolia SR; Brady M
Clin Radiol; 2007 Nov; 62(11):1052-60. PubMed ID: 17920863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Secular stability and reliability of measurements of the percentage of dense tissue on mammograms.
Benichou J; Byrne C; Capece LA; Carroll LE; Hurt-Mullen K; Pee DY; Salane M; Schairer C; Gail MH
Cancer Detect Prev; 2003; 27(4):266-74. PubMed ID: 12893074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
