725 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17617523)
61. Family history as a predictor of uptake of cancer preventive procedures by women with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation.
Metcalfe KA; Foulkes WD; Kim-Sing C; Ainsworth P; Rosen B; Armel S; Poll A; Eisen A; Gilchrist D; Chudley A; Ghadirian P; Maugard C; Lemire EG; Sun P; Narod SA
Clin Genet; 2008 May; 73(5):474-9. PubMed ID: 18341607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. Cost-effectiveness of surveillance and prevention strategies in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers.
Yamauchi H; Nakagawa C; Kobayashi M; Kobayashi Y; Mano T; Nakamura S; Arai M
Breast Cancer; 2018 Mar; 25(2):141-150. PubMed ID: 29019095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. Pathologic findings at risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) in germline BRCA mutation carriers with breast cancer: significance of bilateral RRSO at the optimal age in germline BRCA mutation carriers.
Lee YJ; Lee SW; Kim KR; Jung KH; Lee JW; Kim YM
J Gynecol Oncol; 2017 Jan; 28(1):e3. PubMed ID: 27670257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. The impact of prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomy on menopausal symptoms and sexual function in women who carry a BRCA mutation.
Finch A; Metcalfe KA; Chiang JK; Elit L; McLaughlin J; Springate C; Demsky R; Murphy J; Rosen B; Narod SA
Gynecol Oncol; 2011 Apr; 121(1):163-8. PubMed ID: 21216453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Clinical management of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers.
Domchek SM; Armstrong K; Weber BL
Nat Clin Pract Oncol; 2006 Jan; 3(1):2-3. PubMed ID: 16407858
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
66. [Management of gynecological tumors associated with BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutations. Case report and literature review].
Fruscalzo A; Lellé RJ; Calcagno A; Driul L; Damante G; Marchesoni D
Minerva Ginecol; 2006 Apr; 58(2):171-5. PubMed ID: 16582871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Society of Gynecologic Oncologists Education Committee statement on risk assessment for inherited gynecologic cancer predispositions.
Lancaster JM; Powell CB; Kauff ND; Cass I; Chen LM; Lu KH; Mutch DG; Berchuck A; Karlan BY; Herzog TJ;
Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Nov; 107(2):159-62. PubMed ID: 17950381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Pitfalls and caveats in BRCA sequencing.
Bellosillo B; Tusquets I
Ultrastruct Pathol; 2006; 30(3):229-35. PubMed ID: 16825125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. Screening and prevention of hereditary gynecologic cancers.
Kehoe SM; Kauff ND
Semin Oncol; 2007 Oct; 34(5):406-10. PubMed ID: 17920895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Uptake of risk-reducing surgery in unaffected women at high risk of breast and ovarian cancer is risk, age, and time dependent.
Evans DG; Lalloo F; Ashcroft L; Shenton A; Clancy T; Baildam AD; Brain A; Hopwood P; Howell A
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2009 Aug; 18(8):2318-24. PubMed ID: 19661091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. High frequency of BRCA1/2 germline mutations in consecutive ovarian cancer patients in Poland.
Brozek I; Ochman K; Debniak J; Morzuch L; Ratajska M; Stepnowska M; Stukan M; Emerich J; Limon J
Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Feb; 108(2):433-7. PubMed ID: 17997147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. High risk for ovarian cancer in a prospective series is restricted to BRCA1/2 mutation carriers.
Maehle L; Apold J; Paulsen T; Hagen B; Løvslett K; Fiane B; Van Ghelue M; Clark N; Møller P
Clin Cancer Res; 2008 Nov; 14(22):7569-73. PubMed ID: 19010876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. Strategies for ovarian cancer prevention.
Dann RB; Kelley JL; Zorn KK
Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 2007 Dec; 34(4):667-86, viii. PubMed ID: 18061863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. Subsequent breast and high grade serous carcinomas after risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in BRCA mutation carriers and patients with history of breast cancer.
Straub MM; Podoll MB; David SN; Wiesner GL; Desouki MM
Ann Diagn Pathol; 2018 Oct; 36():28-30. PubMed ID: 30055521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. [Recommendations for the management of women with an increased genetic risk of gynaecological cancer].
Verheijen RH; Boonstra H; Menko FH; de Graaff J; Vasen HF; Kenter GG
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2002 Dec; 146(50):2414-8. PubMed ID: 12518519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Twenty-three novel BRCA1 and BRCA2 sequence alterations in breast and/or ovarian cancer families of Eastern Spain.
Esteban Cardeñosa E; Bolufer Gilabert P; Palanca Suela S; Oltra Soler S; Barragán González E; Velasco Sampedro E; Chirivella González I; Segura Huerta A; Guillén Ponce C; Martínez de Dueñas E;
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2008 Nov; 112(1):69-73. PubMed ID: 18060494
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Screening for RAD51 and BRCA2 BRC repeat mutations in breast and ovarian cancer families.
Rapakko K; Heikkinen K; Karppinen SM; Winqvist R
Cancer Lett; 2006 May; 236(1):142-7. PubMed ID: 16005565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Risk management options elected by women after testing positive for a BRCA mutation.
Garcia C; Wendt J; Lyon L; Jones J; Littell RD; Armstrong MA; Raine-Bennett T; Powell CB
Gynecol Oncol; 2014 Feb; 132(2):428-33. PubMed ID: 24355485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. The effect of personal medical history and family history of cancer on the uptake of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy.
van der Aa JE; Hoogendam JP; Butter ES; Ausems MG; Verheijen RH; Zweemer RP
Fam Cancer; 2015 Dec; 14(4):539-44. PubMed ID: 26264902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. Factors influencing uptake and timing of risk reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in women at risk of familial ovarian cancer: a competing risk time to event analysis.
Manchanda R; Burnell M; Abdelraheim A; Johnson M; Sharma A; Benjamin E; Brunell C; Saridogan E; Gessler S; Oram D; Side L; Rosenthal AN; Jacobs I; Menon U
BJOG; 2012 Apr; 119(5):527-36. PubMed ID: 22260402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
