212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17617906)
1. Serial personal digital assistant data capture of health-related quality of life: a randomized controlled trial in a prostate cancer clinic.
Matthew AG; Currie KL; Irvine J; Ritvo P; Santa Mina D; Jamnicky L; Nam R; Trachtenberg J
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2007 Jul; 5():38. PubMed ID: 17617906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Performance of health status measures with a pen based personal digital assistant.
Kvien TK; Mowinckel P; Heiberg T; Dammann KL; Dale Ø; Aanerud GJ; Alme TN; Uhlig T
Ann Rheum Dis; 2005 Oct; 64(10):1480-4. PubMed ID: 15843456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Personal digital assistant data capture: the future of quality of life measurement in prostate cancer treatment.
Matthew AG; Currie KL; Ritvo P; Nam R; Nesbitt ME; Kalnin RW; Trachtenberg J
J Oncol Pract; 2007 May; 3(3):115-20. PubMed ID: 20859395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prostate cancer active surveillance and health-related quality of life: results of the Finnish arm of the prospective trial.
Vasarainen H; Lokman U; Ruutu M; Taari K; Rannikko A
BJU Int; 2012 Jun; 109(11):1614-9. PubMed ID: 22044485
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The development and evaluation of a PDA-based method for public health surveillance data collection in developing countries.
Yu P; de Courten M; Pan E; Galea G; Pryor J
Int J Med Inform; 2009 Aug; 78(8):532-42. PubMed ID: 19369114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Comparison of self-estimation of disuric disorders gauged IPSS scale and qualities of lives QoL with self-estimation of sexual life gauged by IIEF-5 scale].
Lipczyński W; Dobrowolska-Glazar B; Dobrowolski ZF
Przegl Lek; 2012; 69(6):247-52. PubMed ID: 23094437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Responsiveness of disease-specific and generic utility instruments in prostate cancer patients.
Krahn M; Bremner KE; Tomlinson G; Ritvo P; Irvine J; Naglie G
Qual Life Res; 2007 Apr; 16(3):509-22. PubMed ID: 17091359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Utilizing Digital Health to Collect Electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes in Prostate Cancer: Single-Arm Pilot Trial.
Tran C; Dicker A; Leiby B; Gressen E; Williams N; Jim H
J Med Internet Res; 2020 Mar; 22(3):e12689. PubMed ID: 32209536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Validation of electronic data capture of the Irritable Bowel Syndrome--Quality of Life Measure, the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire for Irritable Bowel Syndrome and the EuroQol.
Bushnell DM; Reilly MC; Galani C; Martin ML; Ricci JF; Patrick DL; McBurney CR
Value Health; 2006; 9(2):98-105. PubMed ID: 16626413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of commonly used orthopaedic outcome measures using palm-top computers and paper surveys.
Saleh KJ; Radosevich DM; Kassim RA; Moussa M; Dykes D; Bottolfson H; Gioe TJ; Robinson H
J Orthop Res; 2002 Nov; 20(6):1146-51. PubMed ID: 12472221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Daily health status registration (patient diary) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison between personal digital assistant and paper-pencil format.
Heiberg T; Kvien TK; Dale Ø; Mowinckel P; Aanerud GJ; Songe-Møller AB; Uhlig T; Hagen KB
Arthritis Rheum; 2007 Apr; 57(3):454-60. PubMed ID: 17394232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Predicting utility scores for prostate cancer: mapping the Prostate Cancer Index to the Patient-Oriented Prostate Utility Scale (PORPUS).
Bremner KE; Mitsakakis N; Wilson L; Krahn MD
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2014 Mar; 17(1):47-56. PubMed ID: 24126796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluating the sexual experience in men: validation of the sexual experience questionnaire.
Mulhall JP; King R; Kirby M; Hvidsten K; Symonds T; Bushmakin AG; Cappelleri JC
J Sex Med; 2008 Feb; 5(2):365-76. PubMed ID: 18179460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Despite technical problems personal digital assistants outperform pen and paper when collecting patient diary data.
Dale O; Hagen KB
J Clin Epidemiol; 2007 Jan; 60(1):8-17. PubMed ID: 17161749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The reliability, validity, and preliminary responsiveness of the Eye Allergy Patient Impact Questionnaire (EAPIQ).
Alexander M; Berger W; Buchholz P; Walt J; Burk C; Lee J; Arbuckle R; Abetz L
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2005 Oct; 3():67. PubMed ID: 16259630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Information needs of residents during inpatient and outpatient rotations: identifying effective personal digital assistant applications.
Barrett JR; Strayer SM; Schubart JR
AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2003; 2003():784. PubMed ID: 14728289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Psychometric properties of a prostate cancer radiation late toxicity questionnaire.
Rodrigues G; Bauman G; Lock M; D'Souza D; Mahon J
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2007 May; 5():29. PubMed ID: 17540022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Validity and reliability of the Italian version of the ECOS-16 questionnaire in postmenopausal women with prevalent vertebral fractures due to osteoporosis.
Salaffi F; Malavolta N; Cimmino MA; Di Matteo L; Scendoni P; Carotti M; Stancati A; Mulé R; Frigato M; Gutierrez M; Grassi W;
Clin Exp Rheumatol; 2007; 25(3):390-403. PubMed ID: 17631735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mode effects in the center for epidemiologic studies depression (CES-D) scale: personal digital assistant vs. paper and pencil administration.
Swartz RJ; de Moor C; Cook KF; Fouladi RT; Basen-Engquist K; Eng C; Carmack Taylor CL
Qual Life Res; 2007 Jun; 16(5):803-13. PubMed ID: 17295102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The use of the SF-36 questionnaire in adult survivors of childhood cancer: evaluation of data quality, score reliability, and scaling assumptions.
Reulen RC; Zeegers MP; Jenkinson C; Lancashire ER; Winter DL; Jenney ME; Hawkins MM
Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2006 Oct; 4():77. PubMed ID: 17022814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
