These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

345 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17618327)

  • 1. Chlorhexidine's effect on sealing ability of composite restorations following Er:YAG laser cavity preparation.
    Geraldo-Martins VR; Robles FR; Matos AB
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2007 Jul; 8(5):26-33. PubMed ID: 17618327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Influence of Erbium:YAG laser energies on the microleakage of Class V resin-based composite restorations.
    Roebuck EM; Saunders WP; Whitters CJ
    Am J Dent; 2000 Oct; 13(5):280-4. PubMed ID: 11764116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Microleakage of class V resin composite restorations after bur, air-abrasion or Er:YAG laser preparation.
    Corona SA; Borsatto M; Dibb RG; Ramos RP; Brugnera A; Pécora JD
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(5):491-7. PubMed ID: 11551014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Microleakage study of different adhesive systems in Class V cavities prepared by Er,Cr:YSGG laser and bur preparation.
    Ergucu Z; Celik EU; Turkun M
    Gen Dent; 2007; 55(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 17333962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cavity preparation devices: effect on microleakage of Class V resin-based composite restorations.
    Setien VJ; Cobb DS; Denehy GE; Vargas MA
    Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):157-62. PubMed ID: 11572294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of marginal microleakage of flowable composite restorations in primary molars prepared by high-speed carbide bur, Er:YAG laser, and air abrasion.
    Borsatto MC; Corona SA; Chinelatti MA; Ramos RP; de Sá Rocha RA; Pecora JD; Palma-Dibb RG
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2006; 73(2):122-6. PubMed ID: 16948375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessing microleakage of class V resin composite restorations after Er:YAG laser and bur preparation.
    Aranha AC; Turbino ML; Powell GL; Eduardo Cde P
    Lasers Surg Med; 2005 Aug; 37(2):172-7. PubMed ID: 16037969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Microleakage of composite resin restorations in cervical cavities prepared by Er,Cr:YSGG laser radiation.
    Shahabi S; Ebrahimpour L; Walsh LJ
    Aust Dent J; 2008 Jun; 53(2):172-5. PubMed ID: 18494974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Microleakage of class V resin composite restorations after conventional and Er:YAG laser preparation.
    Delme KI; Deman PJ; De Moor RJ
    J Oral Rehabil; 2005 Sep; 32(9):676-85. PubMed ID: 16102081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Microleakage of hydrophilic adhesive systems in Class V composite restorations.
    Amaral CM; Hara AT; Pimenta LA; Rodrigues AL
    Am J Dent; 2001 Feb; 14(1):31-3. PubMed ID: 11806477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. ER-YAG laser pretreatment effect on in vitro secondary caries formation around composite restorations.
    Ceballos L; Toledano M; Osorio R; García-Godoy F; Flaitz C; Hicks J
    Am J Dent; 2001 Feb; 14(1):46-9. PubMed ID: 11806480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of rebonding on microleakage of class V aesthetic restorations.
    Erhardt MC; Magalhães CS; Serra MC
    Oper Dent; 2002; 27(4):396-402. PubMed ID: 12120778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of surface roughness of cavity preparations on the microleakage of Class V resin composite restorations.
    Shook LW; Turner EW; Ross J; Scarbecz M
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(6):779-85. PubMed ID: 14653294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of the use of Er:YAG laser for cavity preparation and surface treatment in microleakage of resin-modified glass ionomer restorations.
    Chinelatti MA; Ramos RP; Chimello DT; Borsatto MC; Pécora JD; Palma-Dibb RG
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(4):430-6. PubMed ID: 15279483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Microleakage of Er:YAG laser and dental bur prepared cavities in primary teeth restored with different adhesive restorative materials.
    Baghalian A; Nakhjavani YB; Hooshmand T; Motahhary P; Bahramian H
    Lasers Med Sci; 2013 Nov; 28(6):1453-60. PubMed ID: 23135785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Er:YAG laser cavity preparation and composite resin bonding with a single-component adhesive system: relationship between shear bond strength and microleakage.
    Bertrand MF; Semez G; Leforestier E; Muller-Bolla M; Nammour S; Rocca JP
    Lasers Surg Med; 2006 Jul; 38(6):615-23. PubMed ID: 16671101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Three different methods to evaluate microleakage of packable composites in Class II restorations.
    de Almeida JB; Platt JA; Oshida Y; Moore BK; Cochran MA; Eckert GJ
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(4):453-60. PubMed ID: 12877432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Microleakage and polymerization shrinkage of various polymer restorative materials.
    Gerdolle DA; Mortier E; Droz D
    J Dent Child (Chic); 2008; 75(2):125-33. PubMed ID: 18647507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Influence of marginal bevels on microleakage around Class V cavities bonded with seven self-etching agents.
    Santini A; Ivanovic V; Ibbetson R; Milia E
    Am J Dent; 2004 Aug; 17(4):257-61. PubMed ID: 15478487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of different softstart polymerization techniques on marginal adaptation of Class V restorations.
    Muangmingsuk A; Senawongse P; Yudhasaraprasithi S
    Am J Dent; 2003 Apr; 16(2):117-9. PubMed ID: 12797570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.