BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1761861)

  • 1. [What may be expected from endorectal ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in the assessment of local extension of cancer of the prostate?].
    Cornud F; Belin X; Fromont G; Chretien Y; Helenon O; Boisrond L; Casanova JM; Meuriot T; Moreau JM; Dufour B
    J Urol (Paris); 1991; 97(4-5):179-88. PubMed ID: 1761861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [What may be expected from endorectal echography and magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of local extension of cancer of the prostate?].
    Cornud F; Belin X; Fromont G; Chrétien Y; Hélénon O; Boisrond L; Casanova JM; Meuriot T; Moreau JF; Dufour B
    J Radiol; 1992 Nov; 73(11):617-27. PubMed ID: 1296000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Locoregional staging of prostatic carcinoma: accuracy of magnetic resonance with endorectal coil in 75 patients treated with radical prostatectomy].
    Gualdi GF; Casciani E; Ferriano MG; Polettini E
    Radiol Med; 1998 May; 95(5):498-505. PubMed ID: 9687928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of endorectal magnetic resonance imaging and transrectal ultrasonography in the local staging of prostate cancer with histopathological correlation.
    Bates TS; Gillatt DA; Cavanagh PM; Speakman M
    Br J Urol; 1997 Jun; 79(6):927-32. PubMed ID: 9202562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Endorectal magnetic resonance imaging for staging of prostatic cancer].
    Hayashi N; Kawamura J; Sugimura Y
    Hinyokika Kiyo; 1996 Oct; 42(10):767-73. PubMed ID: 8951473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The predictive value of endorectal 3 Tesla multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for extraprostatic extension in patients with low, intermediate and high risk prostate cancer.
    Somford DM; Hamoen EH; Fütterer JJ; van Basten JP; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA; Vreuls W; van Oort IM; Vergunst H; Kiemeney LA; Barentsz JO; Witjes JA
    J Urol; 2013 Nov; 190(5):1728-34. PubMed ID: 23680307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Local staging of prostatic carcinoma: comparison of transrectal sonography and endorectal MR imaging.
    Presti JC; Hricak H; Narayan PA; Shinohara K; White S; Carroll PR
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Jan; 166(1):103-8. PubMed ID: 8571856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Staging accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging versus transrectal ultrasound in stages A and B prostatic cancer.
    Vapnek JM; Hricak H; Shinohara K; Popovich M; Carroll P
    Urol Int; 1994; 53(4):191-5. PubMed ID: 7855937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [The value of transrectal MRI in the staging of localized prostate cancer].
    Pariente JL; Jacob F; Trillaud H; Deminiere C; Khan H; Ferrière JM; Grenier N; Le Guillou M
    Prog Urol; 1997 Jun; 7(3):449-54. PubMed ID: 9273074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. 11C-choline positron-emission tomography/computed tomography and transrectal ultrasonography for staging localized prostate cancer.
    Rinnab L; Blumstein NM; Mottaghy FM; Hautmann RE; Küfer R; Hohl K; Reske SN
    BJU Int; 2007 Jun; 99(6):1421-6. PubMed ID: 17355373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Value of image fusion in the staging of prostatic carcinoma.
    Selli C; Caramella D; Giusti S; Conti A; Tognetti A; Mogorovich A; De Maria M; Bartolozzi C
    Radiol Med; 2007 Feb; 112(1):74-81. PubMed ID: 17310289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Staging of prostatic carcinoma: TRUS prospective study versus endocoil MRI].
    Mearini L; Rosi P; Zucchi A; Mearini E; Vivacqua C; Salomone U; Regi L; Porena M
    Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2002 Dec; 74(4):309-13. PubMed ID: 12508760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of extracapsular invasion and other staging parameters in patients with prostate cancer candidates for radical prostatectomy.
    Lista F; Gimbernat H; Cáceres F; Rodríguez-Barbero JM; Castillo E; Angulo JC
    Actas Urol Esp; 2014 Jun; 38(5):290-7. PubMed ID: 24387827
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Correlation of transrectal ultrasound imaging and the results of systematic biopsy with pathological examination of radical prostatectomy specimens.
    Gohji K; Morisue K; Kizaki T; Fujii A
    Br J Urol; 1995 Jun; 75(6):758-65. PubMed ID: 7613834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The value of three-dimensional transrectal ultrasonography in staging prostate cancer.
    Mitterberger M; Pinggera GM; Pallwein L; Gradl J; Frauscher F; Bartsch G; Strasser H; Akkad T; Horninger W
    BJU Int; 2007 Jul; 100(1):47-50. PubMed ID: 17433033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Is preoperative transrectal ultrasonography of value in localised prostatic carcinoma? A blind comparative study between preoperative transrectal ultrasonography and the histopathological radical prostatectomy specimen.
    Vijverberg PL; Giessen MC; Kurth KH; Dabhoiwala NF; de Reijke TM; van den Tweel JG
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 1992 Oct; 18(5):449-55. PubMed ID: 1426295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Limited value of endorectal magnetic resonance imaging and transrectal ultrasonography in the staging of clinically localized prostate cancer.
    May F; Treumann T; Dettmar P; Hartung R; Breul J
    BJU Int; 2001 Jan; 87(1):66-9. PubMed ID: 11121995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of transrectal ultrasonography and endorectal magnetic resonance imaging in the local staging of prostatic carcinoma.
    Ekici S; Ozen H; Ağildere M; Ergen A; Ozkardeş H; Ayhan A; Kendi S
    BJU Int; 1999 May; 83(7):796-800. PubMed ID: 10368199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of digital rectal examination, transrectal ultrasonography, and multicoil magnetic resonance imaging for preoperative evaluation of prostate cancer.
    Sanchez-Chapado M; Angulo JC; Ibarburen C; Aguado F; Ruiz A; Viaño J; García-Segura JM; Gonzalez-Esteban J; Rodriquez-Vallejo JM
    Eur Urol; 1997; 32(2):140-9. PubMed ID: 9286643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Significance of endorectal nuclear magnetic resonance tomography and transrectal ultrasound diagnosis in local staging of prostatic carcinoma].
    May F; Treumann T; Dettmar P; Hartung R; Breul J
    Urologe A; 2002 Sep; 41(5):458-61. PubMed ID: 12426863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.