365 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17618927)
1. A prospective study of immediately loaded single implant-retained mandibular overdentures: preliminary one-year results.
Liddelow GJ; Henry PJ
J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Jun; 97(6 Suppl):S126-37. PubMed ID: 17618927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The immediately loaded single implant-retained mandibular overdenture: a 36-month prospective study.
Liddelow G; Henry P
Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(1):13-21. PubMed ID: 20234886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Five-year clinical results of immediately loaded dental implants using mandibular overdentures.
Alfadda SA; Attard NJ; David LA
Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(4):368-73. PubMed ID: 19639074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a comparative pilot study of immediate loading versus delayed loading after two years.
Stephan G; Vidot F; Noharet R; Mariani P
J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Jun; 97(6 Suppl):S138-45. PubMed ID: 17618928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A clinical trial of patient satisfaction and prosthodontic needs with ball and bar attachments for implant-retained complete overdentures: three-year results.
MacEntee MI; Walton JN; Glick N
J Prosthet Dent; 2005 Jan; 93(1):28-37. PubMed ID: 15623995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A Prospective Study of Immediately Loaded Single Implant-Retained Mandibular Overdentures: Long-Term Results with 15-Year Follow-up.
Liddelow G; Wilshaw V; Henry P
Int J Prosthodont; 2024 Apr; 37(2):145-152. PubMed ID: 37988425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A randomized clinical trial comparing patient satisfaction and prosthetic outcomes with mandibular overdentures retained by one or two implants.
Walton JN; Glick N; Macentee MI
Int J Prosthodont; 2009; 22(4):331-9. PubMed ID: 19639067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Immediate loading of implants with mandibular overdentures: one-year clinical results of a prospective study.
Attard NJ; David LA; Zarb GA
Int J Prosthodont; 2005; 18(6):463-70. PubMed ID: 16335163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Five-year results of implants with an oxidized surface placed predominantly in soft quality bone and subjected to immediate occlusal loading.
Glauser R; Zembic A; Ruhstaller P; Windisch S
J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Jun; 97(6 Suppl):S59-68. PubMed ID: 17618935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Patient satisfaction with mandibular implant overdentures and conventional dentures 6 months after delivery.
Thomason JM; Lund JP; Chehade A; Feine JS
Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(5):467-73. PubMed ID: 14651229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mandibular implant overdentures followed for over 10 years: patient compliance and prosthetic maintenance.
Rentsch-Kollar A; Huber S; Mericske-Stern R
Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(2):91-8. PubMed ID: 20305844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mandibular implant-supported overdentures: a prospective evaluation of the burden of prosthodontic maintenance with 3 different attachment systems.
Payne AG; Solomons YF
Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(3):246-53. PubMed ID: 11203640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mandibular overdentures supported by two or four endosseous implants: a 10-year clinical trial.
Meijer HJ; Raghoebar GM; Batenburg RH; Visser A; Vissink A
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jul; 20(7):722-8. PubMed ID: 19489933
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Implant-retained mandibular overdentures versus conventional dentures: 10 years of care and aftercare.
Visser A; Meijer HJ; Raghoebar GM; Vissink A
Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(3):271-8. PubMed ID: 16752625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Five-year results of fixed implant-supported rehabilitations with distal cantilevers for the edentulous mandible.
Gallucci GO; Doughtie CB; Hwang JW; Fiorellini JP; Weber HP
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jun; 20(6):601-7. PubMed ID: 19302389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Implant-supported mandibular overdentures retained with ball or telescopic crown attachments: a 3-year prospective study.
Krennmair G; Weinländer M; Krainhöfner M; Piehslinger E
Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(2):164-70. PubMed ID: 16602365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prosthetic aspects and patient satisfaction with resilient liner and clip attachments for bar- and implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a 3-year randomized clinical study.
ELsyad MA
Int J Prosthodont; 2012; 25(2):148-56. PubMed ID: 22371836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparing the efficacy of mandibular implant-retained overdentures and conventional dentures among middle-aged edentulous patients: satisfaction and functional assessment.
Awad MA; Lund JP; Dufresne E; Feine JS
Int J Prosthodont; 2003; 16(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 12737240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Masticatory function and patient satisfaction with implant-supported mandibular overdentures: a prospective 5-year study.
Bakke M; Holm B; Gotfredsen K
Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(6):575-81. PubMed ID: 12475165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Patient satisfaction with two designs of implant supported removable overdentures; ball attachment and magnets.
Ellis JS; Burawi G; Walls A; Thomason JM
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Nov; 20(11):1293-8. PubMed ID: 19832769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
