224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17619046)
1. Membrane bioreactor sludge rheology at different solid retention times.
Laera G; Giordano C; Pollice A; Saturno D; Mininni G
Water Res; 2007 Oct; 41(18):4197-203. PubMed ID: 17619046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of solid retention time on the rheology of MBR sludge.
Giordano C; Pollice A; Laera G; Saturno D; Mininni G
Water Sci Technol; 2007; 56(8):151-9. PubMed ID: 17978443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Physical characteristics of the sludge in a complete retention membrane bioreactor.
Pollice A; Giordano C; Laera G; Saturno D; Mininni G
Water Res; 2007 Apr; 41(8):1832-40. PubMed ID: 17324447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Rheology of sludge in a complete retention membrane bioreactor.
Pollice A; Giordano C; Laera G; Saturno D; Mininni G
Environ Technol; 2006 Jul; 27(7):723-32. PubMed ID: 16894816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Optimal sludge retention time for a bench scale MBR treating municipal sewage.
Pollice A; Laera G; Saturno D; Giordano C; Sandulli R
Water Sci Technol; 2008; 57(3):319-22. PubMed ID: 18309207
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomass growth and activity in a membrane bioreactor with complete sludge retention.
Pollice A; Laera G; Blonda M
Water Res; 2004 Apr; 38(7):1799-808. PubMed ID: 15026234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of solids retention time on the performance and biological characteristics of a membrane bioreactor.
Cicek N; Macomber J; Davel J; Suidan MT; Audic J; Genestet P
Water Sci Technol; 2001; 43(11):43-50. PubMed ID: 11443985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Changes in characteristics of soluble microbial products in membrane bioreactors associated with different solid retention times: Relation to membrane fouling.
Kimura K; Naruse T; Watanabe Y
Water Res; 2009 Mar; 43(4):1033-9. PubMed ID: 19059627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of complete sludge retention on biomass build-up in a membrane bioreactor.
Pollice A; Laera G
Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(10-11):369-75. PubMed ID: 16459811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fate and distribution of pharmaceuticals in wastewater and sewage sludge of the conventional activated sludge (CAS) and advanced membrane bioreactor (MBR) treatment.
Radjenović J; Petrović M; Barceló D
Water Res; 2009 Feb; 43(3):831-41. PubMed ID: 19091371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Characterization of sludge structure and activity in submerged membrane bioreactor.
Spérandio M; Masse A; Espinosa-Bouchot MC; Cabassud C
Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(10-11):401-8. PubMed ID: 16459815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of sludge retention time on membrane bio-fouling using different type and pore size of membranes in a submerged membrane bioreactor.
Dizge N; Koseoglu-Imer DY; Karagunduz A; Keskinler B
Water Sci Technol; 2013; 67(3):604-11. PubMed ID: 23202566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of chemical sludge disintegration on the performances of wastewater treatment by membrane bioreactor.
Oh YK; Lee KR; Ko KB; Yeom IT
Water Res; 2007 Jun; 41(12):2665-71. PubMed ID: 17451782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Correlation of EPS content in activated sludge at different sludge retention times with membrane fouling phenomena.
Al-Halbouni D; Traber J; Lyko S; Wintgens T; Melin T; Tacke D; Janot A; Dott W; Hollender J
Water Res; 2008 Mar; 42(6-7):1475-88. PubMed ID: 18023465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Relation between EPS adherence, viscoelastic properties, and MBR operation: Biofouling study with QCM-D.
Sweity A; Ying W; Ali-Shtayeh MS; Yang F; Bick A; Oron G; Herzberg M
Water Res; 2011 Dec; 45(19):6430-40. PubMed ID: 22014563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of membrane bioreactor configurations on sludge structure and microbial activity.
Clouzot L; Roche N; Marrot B
Bioresour Technol; 2011 Jan; 102(2):975-81. PubMed ID: 20947340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of hydraulic retention time on membrane fouling and biomass characteristics in submerged membrane bioreactors.
Meng F; Shi B; Yang F; Zhang H
Bioprocess Biosyst Eng; 2007 Sep; 30(5):359-67. PubMed ID: 17566785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Zero net growth in a membrane bioreactor with complete sludge retention.
Laera G; Pollice A; Saturno D; Giordano C; Lopez A
Water Res; 2005 Dec; 39(20):5241-9. PubMed ID: 16290181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Calibrating a side-stream membrane bioreactor using Activated Sludge Model No. 1.
Jiang T; Liu X; Kennedy MD; Schippers JC; Vanrolleghem PA
Water Sci Technol; 2005; 52(10-11):359-67. PubMed ID: 16459810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Performance of bench-scale membrane bioreactor under real work conditions using pure oxygen: viscosity and oxygen transfer analysis.
Rodríguez FA; Martínez-Toledo MV; González-López J; Hontoria E; Poyatos JM
Bioprocess Biosyst Eng; 2010 Sep; 33(7):885-92. PubMed ID: 20148266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
