These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17619173)

  • 1. Condition-dependence, genotype-by-environment interactions and the lek paradox.
    Kokko H; Heubel K
    Genetica; 2008 Feb; 132(2):209-16. PubMed ID: 17619173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Condition-dependence, genotype-by-environment interactions and the lek paradox.
    Kokko H; Heubel K
    Genetica; 2008 Sep; 134(1):55-62. PubMed ID: 18327650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mate choice evolution, dominance effects, and the maintenance of genetic variation.
    Lehmann L; Keller LF; Kokko H
    J Theor Biol; 2007 Jan; 244(2):282-95. PubMed ID: 16979189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mate choice for non-additive genetic benefits: a resolution to the lek paradox.
    Neff BD; Pitcher TE
    J Theor Biol; 2008 Sep; 254(1):147-55. PubMed ID: 18589454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Genic capture and the genetic basis of sexually selected traits in the zebra finch.
    Birkhead TR; Pellatt EJ; Matthews IM; Roddis NJ; Hunter FM; McPhie F; Castillo-Juarez H
    Evolution; 2006 Nov; 60(11):2389-98. PubMed ID: 17236429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Paternal genetic effects on offspring fitness are context dependent within the extrapair mating system of a socially monogamous passerine.
    Schmoll T; Dietrich V; Winkel W; Epplen JT; Schurr F; Lubjuhn T
    Evolution; 2005 Mar; 59(3):645-57. PubMed ID: 15856706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mate choice for nonadditive genetic benefits and the maintenance of genetic diversity in song sparrows.
    Neff BD; Pitcher TE
    J Evol Biol; 2009 Feb; 22(2):424-9. PubMed ID: 19032502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evolution of mate choice for genome-wide heterozygosity.
    Fromhage L; Kokko H; Reid JM
    Evolution; 2009 Mar; 63(3):684-94. PubMed ID: 19220455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Genotype x environment interaction for male attractiveness in an acoustic moth: evidence for plasticity and canalization.
    Danielson-François AM; Kelly JK; Greenfield MD
    J Evol Biol; 2006 Mar; 19(2):532-42. PubMed ID: 16599929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Towards a resolution of the lek paradox.
    Kotiaho JS; Simmons LW; Tomkins JL
    Nature; 2001 Apr; 410(6829):684-6. PubMed ID: 11287953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reaction norm variants for male calling song in populations of Achroia grisella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae): toward a resolution of the lek paradox.
    Zhou Y; Kuster HK; Pettis JS; Danka RG; Gleason JM; Greenfield MD
    Evolution; 2008 Jun; 62(6):1317-34. PubMed ID: 18346222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. On the resolution of the lek paradox.
    Kotiaho JS; LeBas NR; Puurtinen M; Tomkins JL
    Trends Ecol Evol; 2008 Jan; 23(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 18077055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Genic capture, sex linkage, and the heritability of fitness.
    Connallon T
    Am Nat; 2010 May; 175(5):564-76. PubMed ID: 20331359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effects of genotype, age, and social environment on male ornamentation, mating behavior, and attractiveness.
    Miller LK; Brooks R
    Evolution; 2005 Nov; 59(11):2414-25. PubMed ID: 16396182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Costly signals in a field cricket can indicate high- or low-quality direct benefits depending upon the environment.
    Tolle AE; Wagner WE
    Evolution; 2011 Jan; 65(1):283-94. PubMed ID: 20825479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Nongenetic inheritance and the evolution of costly female preference.
    Bonduriansky R; Day T
    J Evol Biol; 2013 Jan; 26(1):76-87. PubMed ID: 23163399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Condition-dependent mutation rates and sexual selection.
    Cotton S
    J Evol Biol; 2009 Apr; 22(4):899-906. PubMed ID: 19210586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The depletion of genetic variance by sexual selection.
    Van Homrigh A; Higgie M; McGuigan K; Blows MW
    Curr Biol; 2007 Mar; 17(6):528-32. PubMed ID: 17306541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Postmating sexual selection favors males that sire offspring with low fitness.
    Bilde T; Foged A; Schilling N; Arnqvist G
    Science; 2009 Jun; 324(5935):1705-6. PubMed ID: 19556506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mate choice for genetic quality when environments vary: suggestions for empirical progress.
    Bussière LF; Hunt J; Stölting KN; Jennions MD; Brooks R
    Genetica; 2008 Sep; 134(1):69-78. PubMed ID: 17987390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.