These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1762027)

  • 1. Defects in automixed addition silicone elastomers prepared by putty-wash impression technique.
    Soh G; Chong YH
    J Oral Rehabil; 1991 Nov; 18(6):547-53. PubMed ID: 1762027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Relationship of viscosity to porosities in automixed elastomeric impressions.
    Soh G; Chong YH
    Clin Mater; 1991; 7(1):23-6. PubMed ID: 10149132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of operator variability on void formation in impressions made with an automixed addition silicone.
    Lim KC; Chong YH; Soh G
    Aust Dent J; 1992 Feb; 37(1):35-8. PubMed ID: 1567292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of loading and syringing on void formation in automixed addition silicone elastomers.
    Chong YH; Soh G; Lim KC
    J Oral Rehabil; 1993 Nov; 20(6):631-6. PubMed ID: 10412486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of interchanging automatic mixing tips on void formation for an automixed addition silicone impression.
    Chong YH; Soh G; Lim KC
    Am J Dent; 1991 Jun; 4(3):127-9. PubMed ID: 1863433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effectiveness of intraoral delivery tips in reducing voids in elastomeric impressions.
    Chong YH; Soh G
    Quintessence Int; 1991 Nov; 22(11):897-900. PubMed ID: 1812513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of the dimensional accuracy of one- and two-step techniques with the use of putty/wash addition silicone impression materials.
    Idris B; Houston F; Claffey N
    J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Nov; 74(5):535-41. PubMed ID: 8809262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy of one-step versus two-step putty wash addition silicone impression technique.
    Hung SH; Purk JH; Tira DE; Eick JD
    J Prosthet Dent; 1992 May; 67(5):583-9. PubMed ID: 1527737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Porosities in five automixed addition silicone elastomers.
    Chong YH; Soh G; Lim KC; Teo CS
    Oper Dent; 1991; 16(3):96-100. PubMed ID: 1803339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dimensional accuracy of resultant casts made by a monophase, one-step and two-step, and a novel two-step putty/light-body impression technique: an in vitro study.
    Caputi S; Varvara G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Apr; 99(4):274-81. PubMed ID: 18395537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of mixing method on void formation in elastomeric impression materials.
    Chong YH; Soh G; Wickens JL
    Int J Prosthodont; 1989; 2(4):323-6. PubMed ID: 2638845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Experimental study on the use of spacer foils in two-step putty and wash impression procedures using silicone impression materials.
    Mann K; Davids A; Range U; Richter G; Boening K; Reitemeier B
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Apr; 113(4):316-22. PubMed ID: 25453563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. In vitro study of the number of surface defects in monophase and two-phase addition silicone impressions.
    Millar BJ; Dunne SM; Robinson PB
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Jul; 80(1):32-5. PubMed ID: 9656175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Pre- and post-set hydrophilicity of elastomeric impression materials.
    Michalakis KX; Bakopoulou A; Hirayama H; Garefis DP; Garefis PD
    J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(4):238-48. PubMed ID: 17559537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Bond between wash elastomers and putty silicones].
    Pfeiffer P; Sommer MP; Schwickerath H
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1991 Jul; 46(7):464-7. PubMed ID: 1817908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of reheating on the accuracy of addition silicone putty-wash impressions.
    Tjan AH; Li T
    J Prosthet Dent; 1991 Jun; 65(6):743-8. PubMed ID: 2072314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of defects in surface detail for monophase, 2-phase, and 3-phase impression techniques: an in vitro study.
    Varvara G; Murmura G; Sinjari B; Cardelli P; Caputi S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Feb; 113(2):108-13. PubMed ID: 25438741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bond strength of three nonaqueous elastomeric impression materials to a light-activated resin tray.
    Payne JA; Pereira BP
    Int J Prosthodont; 1992; 5(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 1520444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of different impression techniques on the dimensional accuracy of impressions using various elastomeric impression materials: an in vitro study.
    Singh K; Sahoo S; Prasad KD; Goel M; Singh A
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2012 Jan; 13(1):98-106. PubMed ID: 22430701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of dimensional accuracy between three different addition cured silicone impression materials.
    Forrester-Baker L; Seymour KG; Samarawickrama D; Zou L; Cherukara G; Patel M
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2005 Jun; 13(2):69-74. PubMed ID: 16011234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.