554 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17620993)
1. Biomechanical considerations in plate osteosynthesis: the effect of plate-to-bone compression with and without angular screw stability.
Stoffel K; Lorenz KU; Kuster MS
J Orthop Trauma; 2007 Jul; 21(6):362-8. PubMed ID: 17620993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Supracondylar femur fracture fixation: mechanical comparison of the 95 degrees condylar side plate and screw versus 95 degrees angled blade plate.
Jaakkola JI; Lundy DW; Moore T; Jones B; Ganey TM; Hutton WC
Acta Orthop Scand; 2002 Jan; 73(1):72-6. PubMed ID: 11928916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Biomechanical comparison of polyaxial-type locking plates and a fixed-angle locking plate for internal fixation of distal femur fractures.
Otto RJ; Moed BR; Bledsoe JG
J Orthop Trauma; 2009 Oct; 23(9):645-52. PubMed ID: 19897986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A biomechanical comparison of locked plate fixation with percutaneous insertion capability versus the angled blade plate in a subtrochanteric fracture gap model.
Crist BD; Khalafi A; Hazelwood SJ; Lee MA
J Orthop Trauma; 2009 Oct; 23(9):622-7. PubMed ID: 19897982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Polyaxial locking plate fixation in distal femur fractures: a biomechanical comparison.
Wilkens KJ; Curtiss S; Lee MA
J Orthop Trauma; 2008 Oct; 22(9):624-8. PubMed ID: 18827592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical analysis of distal femur fracture fixation: fixed-angle screw-plate construct versus condylar blade plate.
Higgins TF; Pittman G; Hines J; Bachus KN
J Orthop Trauma; 2007 Jan; 21(1):43-6. PubMed ID: 17211268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Volar versus dorsal locking plates with and without radial styloid locking plates for the fixation of dorsally comminuted distal radius fractures: A biomechanical study in cadavers.
Blythe M; Stoffel K; Jarrett P; Kuster M
J Hand Surg Am; 2006 Dec; 31(10):1587-93. PubMed ID: 17145377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Are locking screws advantageous with plate fixation of humeral shaft fractures? A biomechanical analysis of synthetic and cadaveric bone.
O'Toole RV; Andersen RC; Vesnovsky O; Alexander M; Topoleski LD; Nascone JW; Sciadini MF; Turen C; Eglseder WA
J Orthop Trauma; 2008; 22(10):709-15. PubMed ID: 18978547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanical testing of the LCP--how can stability in locked internal fixators be controlled?
Stoffel K; Dieter U; Stachowiak G; Gächter A; Kuster MS
Injury; 2003 Nov; 34 Suppl 2():B11-9. PubMed ID: 14580982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Biomechanical comparison of two side plate fixation techniques in an unstable intertrochanteric osteotomy model: Sliding Hip Screw and Percutaneous Compression Plate.
Krischak GD; Augat P; Beck A; Arand M; Baier B; Blakytny R; Gebhard F; Claes L
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2007 Dec; 22(10):1112-8. PubMed ID: 17900766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biomechanical testing of the locking compression plate: when does the distance between bone and implant significantly reduce construct stability?
Ahmad M; Nanda R; Bajwa AS; Candal-Couto J; Green S; Hui AC
Injury; 2007 Mar; 38(3):358-64. PubMed ID: 17296199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biomechanical comparison of polyaxial and uniaxial locking plate fixation in a proximal tibial gap model.
Cullen AB; Curtiss S; Lee MA
J Orthop Trauma; 2009 Aug; 23(7):507-13. PubMed ID: 19633460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Distal femoral fixation: a biomechanical comparison of trigen retrograde intramedullary (i.m.) nail, dynamic condylar screw (DCS), and locking compression plate (LCP) condylar plate.
Heiney JP; Barnett MD; Vrabec GA; Schoenfeld AJ; Baji A; Njus GO
J Trauma; 2009 Feb; 66(2):443-9. PubMed ID: 19204519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanical stability of different fixation constructs for ORIF of radial neck fractures.
Capo JT; Svach D; Ahsgar J; Orillaza NS; Sabatino CT
Orthopedics; 2008 Oct; 31(10):. PubMed ID: 19226014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of plate rotation on the stiffness of femoral LISS: a mechanical study.
Khalafi A; Curtiss S; Hazelwood S; Wolinsky P
J Orthop Trauma; 2006 Sep; 20(8):542-6. PubMed ID: 16990725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Development of static three dimensional screw-plate system and the biomechanic features thereof, a comparative study].
Liang JY; Li KH; Liao QD; Zhu Y; Hu YH; Lei GH
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2009 Jan; 89(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 19489236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The biomechanics of ipsilateral intertrochanteric and femoral shaft fractures: a comparison of 5 fracture fixation techniques.
McConnell A; Zdero R; Syed K; Peskun C; Schemitsch E
J Orthop Trauma; 2008 Sep; 22(8):517-24. PubMed ID: 18758281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biomechanical strength of the Peri-Loc proximal tibial plate: a comparison of all-locked versus hybrid locked/nonlocked screw configurations.
Estes C; Rhee P; Shrader MW; Csavina K; Jacofsky MC; Jacofsky DJ
J Orthop Trauma; 2008; 22(5):312-6. PubMed ID: 18448984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Biomechanical analysis of plate osteosynthesis systems for proximal humerus fractures.
Lever JP; Aksenov SA; Zdero R; Ahn H; McKee MD; Schemitsch EH
J Orthop Trauma; 2008 Jan; 22(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 18176161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanical evaluation of the less invasive stabilization system and the 95-degree angled blade plate for the internal fixation of distal femur Fractures in human cadaveric bones with high bone mineral density.
Zlowodzki M; Williamson S; Zardiackas LD; Kregor PJ
J Trauma; 2006 Apr; 60(4):836-40. PubMed ID: 16612305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
