406 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17621223)
1. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 T.
Fenchel M; Kramer U; Nael K; Miller S
Top Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 Apr; 18(2):95-104. PubMed ID: 17621223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Current status of 3-T cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging.
Lohan DG; Saleh R; Tomasian A; Krishnam M; Finn JP
Top Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Feb; 19(1):3-13. PubMed ID: 18690156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of different cardiac MRI sequences at 1.5 T/3.0 T with respect to signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise ratios - initial experience.
Gutberlet M; Spors B; Grothoff M; Freyhardt P; Schwinge K; Plotkin M; Amthauer H; Noeske R; Felix R
Rofo; 2004 Jun; 176(6):801-8. PubMed ID: 15173972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cardiac MRI of ischemic heart disease at 3 T: potential and challenges.
Wieben O; Francois C; Reeder SB
Eur J Radiol; 2008 Jan; 65(1):15-28. PubMed ID: 18077119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Parallel imaging in cardiovascular MRI: methods and applications.
Niendorf T; Sodickson DK
NMR Biomed; 2006 May; 19(3):325-41. PubMed ID: 16705633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging using an open 0.35 T system.
Klein HM; Meyners W; Neeb B; Labenz J; Truümmler KH
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2007; 31(3):430-4. PubMed ID: 17538291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Acceleration of cardiovascular MRI using parallel imaging: basic principles, practical considerations, clinical applications and future directions].
Niendorf T; Sodickson D
Rofo; 2006 Jan; 178(1):15-30. PubMed ID: 16392054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. 3.0-T functional brain imaging: a 5-year experience.
Scarabino T; Giannatempo GM; Popolizio T; Tosetti M; d'Alesio V; Esposito F; Di Salle F; Di Costanzo A; Bertolino A; Maggialetti A; Salvolini U
Radiol Med; 2007 Feb; 112(1):97-112. PubMed ID: 17310287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Contrast-enhanced whole-heart coronary magnetic resonance angiography at 3.0 T: comparison with steady-state free precession technique at 1.5 T.
Liu X; Bi X; Huang J; Jerecic R; Carr J; Li D
Invest Radiol; 2008 Sep; 43(9):663-8. PubMed ID: 18708861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Noncontrast 3D steady-state free-precession magnetic resonance angiography of the whole chest using nonselective radiofrequency excitation over a large field of view: comparison with single-phase 3D contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography.
Krishnam MS; Tomasian A; Deshpande V; Tran L; Laub G; Finn JP; Ruehm SG
Invest Radiol; 2008 Jun; 43(6):411-20. PubMed ID: 18496046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Feasibility of cardiac gating free of interference with electro-magnetic fields at 1.5 Tesla, 3.0 Tesla and 7.0 Tesla using an MR-stethoscope.
Frauenrath T; Hezel F; Heinrichs U; Kozerke S; Utting JF; Kob M; Butenweg C; Boesiger P; Niendorf T
Invest Radiol; 2009 Sep; 44(9):539-47. PubMed ID: 19652614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of cardiac MRI on 1.5 and 3.0 Tesla clinical whole body systems.
Hinton DP; Wald LL; Pitts J; Schmitt F
Invest Radiol; 2003 Jul; 38(7):436-42. PubMed ID: 12821858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cardiac magnetic resonance parallel imaging at 3.0 Tesla: technical feasibility and advantages.
McGee KP; Debbins JP; Boskamp EB; Blawat L; Angelos L; King KF
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2004 Mar; 19(3):291-7. PubMed ID: 14994296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Establishing a cardiac MRI program: problems, pitfalls, expectations.
Atalay MK
J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 Sep; 2(9):740-8. PubMed ID: 17411921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. MR imaging of epilepsy: state of the art at 1.5 T and potential of 3 T.
Briellmann RS; Pell GS; Wellard RM; Mitchell LA; Abbott DF; Jackson GD
Epileptic Disord; 2003 Mar; 5(1):3-20. PubMed ID: 12773291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Very fast cardiac imaging.
Schwitter J; Sakuma H; Saeed M; Wendland MF; Higgins CB
Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am; 1996 May; 4(2):419-32. PubMed ID: 8724571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Time-resolved 3D pulmonary perfusion MRI: comparison of different k-space acquisition strategies at 1.5 and 3 T.
Attenberger UI; Ingrisch M; Dietrich O; Herrmann K; Nikolaou K; Reiser MF; Schönberg SO; Fink C
Invest Radiol; 2009 Sep; 44(9):525-31. PubMed ID: 19652608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Magnetic resonance in cardiology. The current clinical outlook].
de Almeida AG; Vagueiro MC
Rev Port Cardiol; 1998; 17(7-8):619-34. PubMed ID: 9741218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of physiological noise at 1.5 T, 3 T and 7 T and optimization of fMRI acquisition parameters.
Triantafyllou C; Hoge RD; Krueger G; Wiggins CJ; Potthast A; Wiggins GC; Wald LL
Neuroimage; 2005 May; 26(1):243-50. PubMed ID: 15862224
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [The role of advanced cardiac imaging methods in coronary artery disease].
Kiraç S
Anadolu Kardiyol Derg; 2008 Jul; 8 Suppl 1():1-4. PubMed ID: 18611832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
