These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17621988)

  • 41. A one-year review of macrosomic births at the Cantonal Hospital Zenica, Bosnia and Herzegovina.
    Štimjanin H; Iriškić R; Hodžić J; Štimjanin E
    Med Glas (Zenica); 2020 Feb; 17(1):141-144. PubMed ID: 31719508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Macrosomic newborns of non-diabetic mothers: anthropometric measurements and neonatal complications.
    Linder N; Lahat Y; Kogan A; Fridman E; Kouadio F; Melamed N; Yogev Y; Klinger G
    Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed; 2014 Sep; 99(5):F353-8. PubMed ID: 24792775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. The influence of macrosomia on the duration of labor, the mode of delivery and intrapartum complications.
    Siggelkow W; Boehm D; Skala C; Grosslercher M; Schmidt M; Koelbl H
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2008 Dec; 278(6):547-53. PubMed ID: 18379807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Intrapartum hydramnios at term and perinatal outcome.
    Chauhan SP; Martin RW; Morrison JC
    J Perinatol; 1993; 13(3):186-9. PubMed ID: 8345380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Fetal macrosomia and pregnancy outcome in Lagos.
    Abudu OO; Awonuga AO
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1989 Mar; 28(3):257-62. PubMed ID: 2564355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Recurrence of fetal macrosomia in non-diabetic pregnancies.
    Walsh CA; Mahony RT; Foley ME; Daly L; O'Herlihy C
    J Obstet Gynaecol; 2007 May; 27(4):374-8. PubMed ID: 17654189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Predictors and pregnancy outcomes associated with a newborn birth weight of 4000 g or more in Lusaka, Zambia.
    Liu KC; Joseph JA; Nkole TB; Kaunda E; Stringer JS; Chi BH; Stringer EM
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2013 Aug; 122(2):150-5. PubMed ID: 23669164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Macrosomic births at Mostar Clinical Hospital: a 2-year review.
    Tomić V; Bosnjak K; Petrov B; Dikić M; Knezević D
    Bosn J Basic Med Sci; 2007 Aug; 7(3):271-4. PubMed ID: 17848156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Fetal macrosomia: risk factors and outcome. A study of the outcome concerning 100 cases >4500 g.
    Bérard J; Dufour P; Vinatier D; Subtil D; Vanderstichèle S; Monnier JC; Puech F
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1998 Mar; 77(1):51-9. PubMed ID: 9550201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Fetal macrosomia in Japanese women.
    Morikawa M; Cho K; Yamada T; Yamada T; Sato S; Minakami H
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2013 May; 39(5):960-5. PubMed ID: 23279000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Fetal macrosomia and pregnancy outcomes.
    Ju H; Chadha Y; Donovan T; O'Rourke P
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2009 Oct; 49(5):504-9. PubMed ID: 19780734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Vaginal birth after cesarean section: is suspected fetal macrosomia a contraindication?
    Flamm BL; Goings JR
    Obstet Gynecol; 1989 Nov; 74(5):694-7. PubMed ID: 2638575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. [Analysis of the indications for the caesarean section delivery for very low birthweight neonates (< 1500 g) delivered in I department gynecology and obstetrics, Medical University in Lodz in 2006-2010].
    Brzozowska M; Kowalska-Koprek U; Kuś E; Berner-Trabska M; Karowicz-Bilińska A
    Ginekol Pol; 2011 Aug; 82(8):592-7. PubMed ID: 21957603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Suspicion and treatment of the macrosomic fetus: a review.
    Chauhan SP; Grobman WA; Gherman RA; Chauhan VB; Chang G; Magann EF; Hendrix NW
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Aug; 193(2):332-46. PubMed ID: 16098852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Macrosomia--maternal, fetal, and neonatal implications.
    Modanlou HD; Dorchester WL; Thorosian A; Freeman RK
    Obstet Gynecol; 1980 Apr; 55(4):420-4. PubMed ID: 7366896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Macrosomic births in abuja: A case-control study of predisposing factors and early neonatal outcome.
    Akindele RN; Audu LI; Mokuolu OA
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2017 Mar; 20(3):320-327. PubMed ID: 28256487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. [Macrosomia of the fetus and clinical relevance].
    Kolben M; Schneider KT; Thieme C; Schöffel J; Graeff H
    Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1990 Apr; 50(4):270-7. PubMed ID: 2358178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Must macrosomic fetuses be delivered by a caesarean section? A review of outcome for 786 babies greater than or equal to 4,500 g.
    Menticoglou SM; Manning FA; Morrison I; Harman CR
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1992 May; 32(2):100-3. PubMed ID: 1520190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Secular trends in cesarean delivery rates among macrosomic deliveries in the United States, 1989 to 2002.
    Boulet SL; Alexander GR; Salihu HM
    J Perinatol; 2005 Sep; 25(9):569-76. PubMed ID: 16079908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Macrosomia, top of the iceberg: the charm of underlying factors.
    Donma MM
    Pediatr Int; 2011 Feb; 53(1):78-84. PubMed ID: 20626633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.