186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17622002)
1. Retention and load transfer characteristics of implant-retained auricular prostheses.
Williams BH; Ochiai KT; Baba T; Caputo AA
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(3):366-72. PubMed ID: 17622002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Photoelastic stress analysis of various retention mechanisms on 3-implant-retained mandibular overdentures.
Celik G; Uludag B
J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Apr; 97(4):229-35. PubMed ID: 17499093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Photoelastic analysis of the effect of palatal support on various implant-supported overdenture designs.
Ochiai KT; Williams BH; Hojo S; Nishimura R; Caputo AA
J Prosthet Dent; 2004 May; 91(5):421-7. PubMed ID: 15153848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The change in retentive values of locator attachments and hader clips over time.
Evtimovska E; Masri R; Driscoll CF; Romberg E
J Prosthodont; 2009 Aug; 18(6):479-83. PubMed ID: 19500236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Retention characteristics of attachment systems for implant overdentures.
Chung KH; Chung CY; Cagna DR; Cronin RJ
J Prosthodont; 2004 Dec; 13(4):221-6. PubMed ID: 15610542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Retention of maxillary implant overdenture bars of different designs.
Williams BH; Ochiai KT; Hojo S; Nishimura R; Caputo AA
J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Dec; 86(6):603-7. PubMed ID: 11753311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The service life of implant-retained overdenture attachment systems.
Pigozzo MN; Mesquita MF; Henriques GE; Vaz LG
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Aug; 102(2):74-80. PubMed ID: 19643220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Magnetic retention and bar-clip attachment for implant-retained auricular prostheses: a comparative analysis.
de Sousa AA; Mattos BS
Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(3):233-6. PubMed ID: 18548962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of attachment systems on load transfer of an implant-assisted maxillary overdenture.
Fanuscu MI; Caputo AA
J Prosthodont; 2004 Dec; 13(4):214-20. PubMed ID: 15610541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Retention forces of spherical attachments as a function of implant and matrix angulation in mandibular overdentures: an in vitro study.
Ortegón SM; Thompson GA; Agar JR; Taylor TD; Perdikis D
J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Apr; 101(4):231-8. PubMed ID: 19328276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of Stress Distribution on Implant-Retained Auricular Prostheses: The Finite Element Method.
Abbas AA; Santiwong P; Wonglamsam A; Srithavaj T; Chanthasopeephan T
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2017; 32(2):251–258. PubMed ID: 28231344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The influence of interimplant distance and attachment type on the retention characteristics of mandibular overdentures on 2 implants: initial retention values.
Michelinakis G; Barclay CW; Smith PW
Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(5):507-12. PubMed ID: 17323731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Mechanical evaluation of craniofacial osseointegration retention systems.
Del Valle V; Faulkner G; Wolfaardt J; Rangert B; Tan HK
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1995; 10(4):491-8. PubMed ID: 7672853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Stress patterns around distal angled implants in the all-on-four concept configuration.
Begg T; Geerts GA; Gryzagoridis J
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):663-71. PubMed ID: 19885406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Implant retained auricular prosthesis with a modified hader bar: a case report.
Lovely M; Dathan PC; Gopal D; George BT; Chandrasekharan Nair K
J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2014 Jun; 14(2):187-90. PubMed ID: 24757357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of denture cleansing solutions on the retention of yellow Hader clips: an in vitro study.
Varghese RM; Masri R; Driscoll CF; Romberg E
J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(3):165-71. PubMed ID: 17581177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Photoelastic analysis of implant-retained and conventional obturator prostheses with different attachment systems and soft relining.
do Prado Ribeiro P; Goiato MC; Pellizzer EP; Pesqueira AA; Haddad MF; de Carvalho Dekon SF; dos Santos DM
J Craniofac Surg; 2011 May; 22(3):797-800. PubMed ID: 21558947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Alternative retention for an implant-retained auricular prosthesis.
Mekayarajjananonth T; LoCascio SJ; Winkler S; Salinas TJ; Guerra LR
J Oral Implantol; 2002; 28(3):117-21. PubMed ID: 12498442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Photoelastic stress analysis of different attachment systems on implant-retained and conventional palatal obturator prostheses.
do Prado Ribeiro P; Goiato MC; Pellizzer EP; Pesqueira AA; Haddad MF; Alves-Rezende MC; dos Santos DM
J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 22(2):523-6. PubMed ID: 21403545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Osseointegrated implants and auricular defects: a case series study.
Wright RF; Zemnick C; Wazen JJ; Asher E
J Prosthodont; 2008 Aug; 17(6):468-75. PubMed ID: 18544137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
