BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17622002)

  • 21. Stress analysis of two craniofacial implants in implant retained auricular prostheses.
    Abbas AA; Chanthasopeephan T
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2015; 2015():4816-9. PubMed ID: 26737371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Survival rates and periimplant soft tissue evaluation of extraoral implants over a mean follow-up period of three years.
    Karakoca S; Aydin C; Yilmaz H; Bal BT
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Dec; 100(6):458-64. PubMed ID: 19033030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A retrospective study of implant-retained auricular prostheses.
    Guo G; Schwedtner O; Klein M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(3):539-43. PubMed ID: 18700380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The influence of interimplant distance and attachment type on the retention characteristics of mandibular overdentures on 2 implants: 6-month fatigue retention values.
    Doukas D; Michelinakis G; Smith PW; Barclay CW
    Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(2):152-4. PubMed ID: 18546771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Implant-retained auricular prosthesis.
    Demir N; Malkoc MA; Ozturk AN; Tosun Z
    J Craniofac Surg; 2010 Nov; 21(6):1795-7. PubMed ID: 21119423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Implant-retained auricular prostheses: an assessment of implant success and prosthetic complications.
    Aydin C; Karakoca S; Yilmaz H; Yilmaz C
    Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(3):241-4. PubMed ID: 18548964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A surgical guide for craniofacial implant placement for an implant-retained auricular prosthesis.
    Ozçelik TB; Tanner PB
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Apr; 103(4):253-5. PubMed ID: 20362769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Implant-supported facial prostheses.
    Baima RF
    J Mich Dent Assoc; 1996; 78(4):50-4, 56-64. PubMed ID: 9520655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effects of prosthesis design and impression techniques on human cortical bone strain around oral implants under load.
    Akça K; Kokat AM; Sahin S; Iplikcioglu H; Cehreli MC
    Med Eng Phys; 2009 Sep; 31(7):758-63. PubMed ID: 19269878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Retention and Stability Characteristics of Soft-Liner and Clip Attachments Used for Bar/Implant-Assisted Mandibular Overdentures: An In Vitro Study.
    Denewar MM; Abdelmawgood EI; ELsyad MA; Al-Tonbary GY
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2021; 36(6):1095–1103. PubMed ID: 34157064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Effect of compromised cortical bone on implant load distribution.
    Akça K; Fanuscu MI; Caputo AA
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Dec; 17(8):616-20. PubMed ID: 18798784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Craniofacial implant-retained auricular prosthesis: a case report.
    Dilber E; Koc O; Ozturk AN; Karamese M
    J Oral Implantol; 2013 Aug; 39(4):479-82. PubMed ID: 21905887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Prosthesis auricular with osseointegrated implants and quality of life.
    dos Santos DM; Goiato MC; Pesqueira AA; Bannwart LC; Rezende MC; Magro-Filho O; Moreno A
    J Craniofac Surg; 2010 Jan; 21(1):94-6. PubMed ID: 20061968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Refabrication of an implant-retained auricular prosthesis using clip attachment pickup technique.
    Kethireddy S; Kethireddy K
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2017; 17(3):310-315. PubMed ID: 28936047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A photoelastic and strain-gauge analysis of interface force transmission of internal-cone implants.
    Akça K; Cehreli MC
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2008 Aug; 28(4):391-9. PubMed ID: 18717378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Within-subject comparison of two rigid bar designs connecting two interforaminal implants: patients' satisfaction and prosthetic results.
    Mericske-Stern R; Probst D; Fahrländer F; Schellenberg M
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Sep; 11(3):228-37. PubMed ID: 18783424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Clinical evaluation of a newly designed single-stage craniofacial implant: a pilot study.
    Khamis MM; Medra A; Gauld J
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Nov; 100(5):375-83. PubMed ID: 18992571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Misfit and functional loading of craniofacial implants.
    Miller KL; Faulkner G; Wolfaardt JF
    Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(3):267-73. PubMed ID: 15237870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Comparison of stress distribution between complete denture and implant-retained overdenture-2D FEA.
    Assunção WG; Tabata LF; Barão VA; Rocha EP
    J Oral Rehabil; 2008 Oct; 35(10):766-74. PubMed ID: 18482352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of detachment forces of two implant overdenture attachment types: effect of detachment speed.
    Jefferies SR; Boston DW; Damrow MP; Galbraith CT
    Am J Dent; 2008 Aug; 21(4):244-50. PubMed ID: 18795521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.