186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17622002)
61. Photoelastic analysis of stress distribution in different retention systems for facial prosthesis.
Goiato MC; Ribeiro Pdo P; Pellizzer EP; Garcia Júnior IR; Pesqueira AA; Haddad MF
J Craniofac Surg; 2009 May; 20(3):757-61. PubMed ID: 19381103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
62. The effect of engaging the screw access channel of an implant abutment with a cement-retained restoration.
Naik S; Tredwin CJ; Nesbit M; Setchell DJ; Moles DR
J Prosthodont; 2009 Apr; 18(3):245-8. PubMed ID: 19141047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
63. CAD/CAM ear model and virtual construction of the mold.
Ciocca L; Mingucci R; Gassino G; Scotti R
J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Nov; 98(5):339-43. PubMed ID: 18021820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
64. The influence of implant diameter and length on stress distribution of osseointegrated implants related to crestal bone geometry: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Baggi L; Cappelloni I; Di Girolamo M; Maceri F; Vairo G
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Dec; 100(6):422-31. PubMed ID: 19033026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
65. Retention and Mechanical Behavior of Attachment Systems for Implant-Retained Auricular Prostheses.
Sigua-Rodriguez EA; Goulart DR; Santos ZT; Alvarez-Pinzon N; Olate S; de Albergaria-Barbosa JR
J Craniofac Surg; 2017 Jan; 28(1):134-138. PubMed ID: 27922962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
66. Functional improvement of implant-retained ear epistheses with magnets and a retention clasp.
Pröbster L; Bootz F; Weber H; Zugaro C
Int J Prosthodont; 1995; 8(1):56-61. PubMed ID: 7710626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
67. Tissue-integrated prostheses in the rehabilitation of auricular defects: results with percutaneous mastoid implants.
Niparko JK; Langman AW; Cutler DS; Carroll WR
Am J Otol; 1993 Jul; 14(4):343-8. PubMed ID: 8238268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
68. Comparison of retentive force and wear pattern of Locator® and ADD-TOC attachments combined with CAD-CAM milled bar.
Chae SK; Cho WT; Choi JW; Bae EB; Bae JH; Bae GH; Huh JB
J Adv Prosthodont; 2022 Feb; 14(1):12-21. PubMed ID: 35284053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
69. An impression and cast construction technique for implant-retained auricular prostheses.
Wolfaardt JF; Coss P
J Prosthet Dent; 1996 Jan; 75(1):45-9. PubMed ID: 8850450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
70. Stress analysis in oral obturator prostheses over parallel and tilted implants: photoelastic imaging.
Pesqueira AA; Goiato MC; dos Santos DM; Nobrega AS; Haddad MF; Andreotti AM; Moreno A
J Biomed Opt; 2013 Oct; 18(10):106009. PubMed ID: 24129983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
71. Restoration with implants in patients with recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa and patient satisfaction with the implant-supported superstructure.
Peñarrocha M; Larrazábal C; Balaguer J; Serrano C; Silvestre J; Bagán JV
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(4):651-5. PubMed ID: 17929528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
72. Applications of rapid prototyping technology in maxillofacial prosthetics.
Sykes LM; Parrott AM; Owen CP; Snaddon DR
Int J Prosthodont; 2004; 17(4):454-9. PubMed ID: 15382782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
73. The staggered installation of dental implants and its effect on bone stresses.
Abu-Hammad O; Khraisat A; Dar-Odeh N; Jagger DC; Hammerle CH
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2007 Sep; 9(3):121-7. PubMed ID: 17716255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
74. On the role of number of fixtures, surgical technique and timing of loading.
Eliasson A
Swed Dent J Suppl; 2008; (197):3-95. PubMed ID: 18652085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
75. Magnet-retained auricular prosthesis with an implant-supported composite bar: a clinical report.
Chung RW; Siu AS; Chu FC; Chow TW
J Prosthet Dent; 2003 May; 89(5):446-9. PubMed ID: 12806320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
76. Toward identifying specification requirements for digital bone-anchored prosthesis design incorporating substructure fabrication: a pilot study.
Eggbeer D; Bibb R; Evans P
Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(3):258-63. PubMed ID: 16752622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
77. Attachments used for implant-supported facial prostheses: a survey of United States, Canadian, and Swedish centers.
Rubenstein JE
J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Mar; 73(3):262-6. PubMed ID: 7760275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
78. Peri-implant soft tissue maintenance in patients with craniofacial implant retained prostheses.
Allen PF; Watson G; Stassen L; McMillan AS
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2000 Apr; 29(2):99-103. PubMed ID: 10833145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
79. Effect of different mucosa thickness and resiliency on stress distribution of implant-retained overdentures-2D FEA.
Barão VA; Assunção WG; Tabata LF; de Sousa EA; Rocha EP
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2008 Nov; 92(2):213-23. PubMed ID: 18783845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
80. [The attachments of the IMZ system in full denture prosthodontics].
Wöstmann B; Rasch KR; van Benthem H
Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1991 Oct; 46(10):682-5. PubMed ID: 1817862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
