192 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17622189)
1. Speech recognition as a function of high-pass filter cutoff frequency for people with and without low-frequency cochlear dead regions.
Vinay ; Moore BC
J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Jul; 122(1):542-53. PubMed ID: 17622189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Speech recognition in noise as a function of highpass-filter cutoff frequency for people with and without low-frequency cochlear dead regions.
Vinay ; Baer T; Moore BC
J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Feb; 123(2):606-9. PubMed ID: 18273950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Factors affecting psychophysical tuning curves for hearing-impaired subjects with high-frequency dead regions.
Kluk K; Moore BC
Hear Res; 2005 Feb; 200(1-2):115-31. PubMed ID: 15668043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of low-pass filtering on identification of nonsense syllables in quiet by school-age children with and without cochlear dead regions.
Malicka AN; Munro KJ; Baer T; Baker RJ; Moore BC
Ear Hear; 2013; 34(4):458-69. PubMed ID: 23337997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Benefits of audibility for listeners with severe high-frequency hearing loss.
Simpson A; McDermott HJ; Dowell RC
Hear Res; 2005 Dec; 210(1-2):42-52. PubMed ID: 16137848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Identifying dead regions in the cochlea: psychophysical tuning curves and tone detection in threshold-equalizing noise.
Summers V; Molis MR; Müsch H; Walden BE; Surr RK; Cord MT
Ear Hear; 2003 Apr; 24(2):133-42. PubMed ID: 12677110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Psychophysical tuning curves and recognition of highpass and lowpass filtered speech for a person with an inverted V-shaped audiogram (L).
Vinay ; Moore BC
J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Feb; 127(2):660-3. PubMed ID: 20568336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Low-frequency sensorineural loss: clinical evaluation and implications for hearing aid fitting.
Halpin C; Thornton A; Hasso M
Ear Hear; 1994 Feb; 15(1):71-81. PubMed ID: 8194681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of low-pass filtering on the intelligibility of speech in quiet for people with and without dead regions at high frequencies.
Vickers DA; Moore BC; Baer T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Aug; 110(2):1164-75. PubMed ID: 11519583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response.
Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB; Dubno JR
Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Temporary off-frequency listening after noise trauma.
Etchelecou MC; Coulet O; Derkenne R; Tomasi M; Noreña AJ
Hear Res; 2011 Dec; 282(1-2):81-91. PubMed ID: 21986211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Peripheral perception mechanism of ultrasonic hearing.
Nishimura T; Okayasu T; Uratani Y; Fukuda F; Saito O; Hosoi H
Hear Res; 2011 Jul; 277(1-2):176-83. PubMed ID: 21238563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Intelligibility of speech in noise at high presentation levels: effects of hearing loss and frequency region.
Summers V; Cord MT
J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Aug; 122(2):1130-7. PubMed ID: 17672659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of low pass filtering on the intelligibility of speech in noise for people with and without dead regions at high frequencies.
Baer T; Moore BC; Kluk K
J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Sep; 112(3 Pt 1):1133-44. PubMed ID: 12243160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Relation between derived-band auditory brainstem response latencies and behavioral frequency selectivity.
Strelcyk O; Christoforidis D; Dau T
J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Oct; 126(4):1878-88. PubMed ID: 19813802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dead regions in the cochlea: implications for speech recognition and applicability of articulation index theory.
Vestergaard MD
Int J Audiol; 2003 Jul; 42(5):249-61. PubMed ID: 12916698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. No evidence for enhanced processing of speech that is low-pass filtered near the edge frequency of cochlear dead regions in children.
Malicka AN; Wilson WJ; Baer T; Munro KJ; Baker RJ; Miluzzi D; Moore BCJ
Int J Audiol; 2018 Aug; 57(8):632-637. PubMed ID: 29688099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The use of psychophysical tuning curves to explore dead regions in the cochlea.
Moore BC; Alcántara JI
Ear Hear; 2001 Aug; 22(4):268-78. PubMed ID: 11527034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cochlear dead regions in typical hearing aid candidates: prevalence and implications for use of high-frequency speech cues.
Cox RM; Alexander GC; Johnson J; Rivera I
Ear Hear; 2011; 32(3):339-48. PubMed ID: 21522068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Towards understanding the specifics of cochlear hearing loss: a modelling approach.
Stenfelt S
Int J Audiol; 2008 Nov; 47 Suppl 2():S10-5. PubMed ID: 19012107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
