229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17622352)
1. X-ray structures of the signal recognition particle receptor reveal targeting cycle intermediates.
Reyes CL; Rutenber E; Walter P; Stroud RM
PLoS One; 2007 Jul; 2(7):e607. PubMed ID: 17622352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Conformational change of the N-domain on formation of the complex between the GTPase domains of Thermus aquaticus Ffh and FtsY.
Shepotinovskaya IV; Freymann DM
Biochim Biophys Acta; 2002 May; 1597(1):107-14. PubMed ID: 12009409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Multi-state targeting machinery govern the fidelity and efficiency of protein localization.
Yang M; Pang X; Han K
Adv Exp Med Biol; 2014; 805():385-409. PubMed ID: 24446370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The conformation of bound GMPPNP suggests a mechanism for gating the active site of the SRP GTPase.
Padmanabhan S; Freymann DM
Structure; 2001 Sep; 9(9):859-67. PubMed ID: 11566135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Conformational changes in the bacterial SRP receptor FtsY upon binding of guanine nucleotides and SRP.
Jagath JR; Rodnina MV; Wintermeyer W
J Mol Biol; 2000 Jan; 295(4):745-53. PubMed ID: 10656787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Induced nucleotide specificity in a GTPase.
Shan SO; Walter P
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2003 Apr; 100(8):4480-5. PubMed ID: 12663860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Lipid activation of the signal recognition particle receptor provides spatial coordination of protein targeting.
Lam VQ; Akopian D; Rome M; Henningsen D; Shan SO
J Cell Biol; 2010 Aug; 190(4):623-35. PubMed ID: 20733058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. X-ray structure of the T. aquaticus FtsY:GDP complex suggests functional roles for the C-terminal helix of the SRP GTPases.
Gawronski-Salerno J; Coon JS; Focia PJ; Freymann DM
Proteins; 2007 Mar; 66(4):984-95. PubMed ID: 17186523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Structure of the GMPPNP-stabilized NG domain complex of the SRP GTPases Ffh and FtsY.
Gawronski-Salerno J; Freymann DM
J Struct Biol; 2007 Apr; 158(1):122-8. PubMed ID: 17184999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Substrate twinning activates the signal recognition particle and its receptor.
Egea PF; Shan SO; Napetschnig J; Savage DF; Walter P; Stroud RM
Nature; 2004 Jan; 427(6971):215-21. PubMed ID: 14724630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Unraveling the interface of signal recognition particle and its receptor by using chemical cross-linking and tandem mass spectrometry.
Chu F; Shan SO; Moustakas DT; Alber F; Egea PF; Stroud RM; Walter P; Burlingame AL
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2004 Nov; 101(47):16454-9. PubMed ID: 15546976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The bacterial SRP receptor, SecA and the ribosome use overlapping binding sites on the SecY translocon.
Kuhn P; Weiche B; Sturm L; Sommer E; Drepper F; Warscheid B; Sourjik V; Koch HG
Traffic; 2011 May; 12(5):563-78. PubMed ID: 21255212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Molecular crosstalk between the nucleotide specificity determinant of the SRP GTPase and the SRP receptor.
Shan SO; Walter P
Biochemistry; 2005 Apr; 44(16):6214-22. PubMed ID: 15835909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A distinct mechanism to achieve efficient signal recognition particle (SRP)-SRP receptor interaction by the chloroplast srp pathway.
Jaru-Ampornpan P; Nguyen TX; Shan SO
Mol Biol Cell; 2009 Sep; 20(17):3965-73. PubMed ID: 19587121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Predominant membrane localization is an essential feature of the bacterial signal recognition particle receptor.
Mircheva M; Boy D; Weiche B; Hucke F; Graumann P; Koch HG
BMC Biol; 2009 Nov; 7():76. PubMed ID: 19912622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Signal sequence-independent SRP-SR complex formation at the membrane suggests an alternative targeting pathway within the SRP cycle.
Braig D; Mircheva M; Sachelaru I; van der Sluis EO; Sturm L; Beckmann R; Koch HG
Mol Biol Cell; 2011 Jul; 22(13):2309-23. PubMed ID: 21551068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Analysis of the GTPase activity and active sites of the NG domains of FtsY and Ffh from Streptomyces coelicolor.
Dong HJ; Tao SM; Li YQ; Chan SH; Shen XL; Wang CX; Guan WJ
Acta Biochim Biophys Sin (Shanghai); 2006 Jul; 38(7):467-76. PubMed ID: 16820862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. RNA-mediated interaction between the peptide-binding and GTPase domains of the signal recognition particle.
Spanggord RJ; Siu F; Ke A; Doudna JA
Nat Struct Mol Biol; 2005 Dec; 12(12):1116-22. PubMed ID: 16299512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Role of 4.5S RNA in assembly of the bacterial signal recognition particle with its receptor.
Peluso P; Herschlag D; Nock S; Freymann DM; Johnson AE; Walter P
Science; 2000 Jun; 288(5471):1640-3. PubMed ID: 10834842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Characterization of FtsY, its interaction with Ffh, and proteomic identification of their potential substrates in Mycobacterium tuberculosis.
Venkatesan A; Palaniyandi K; Sharma D; Bisht D; Narayanan S
Can J Microbiol; 2018 Apr; 64(4):243-251. PubMed ID: 29361248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
