129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1762351)
1. [Automatic perimetry of the central visual field in diseases of the macula].
Janknecht P; Soriano JM; Funk J; Hansen LL
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1991 Oct; 199(4):259-63. PubMed ID: 1762351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Assessment of the macula function by static perimetry, microperimetry and rarebit perimetry in patients suffering from dry age related macular degeneration].
Nowomiejska K; Oleszczuk A; Zubilewicz A; Krukowski J; Mańkowska A; Rejdak R; Zagórski Z
Klin Oczna; 2007; 109(4-6):131-4. PubMed ID: 17725269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Kinetic fundus controlled perimetry with the scanning laser ophthalmoscope].
Rohrschneider K; Becker M; Fendrich T; Völcker HE
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1995 Aug; 207(2):102-10. PubMed ID: 7474772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Reduction of retinal light sensitivity in diabetic patients].
Pahor D
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2003 Dec; 220(12):868-72. PubMed ID: 14704945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Objective assessment of visual field defects using multifocal electroretinography].
Kretschmann U; Gendo K; Wilhelm H; Schiefer U; Hettesheimer H; Zrenner E
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1998 Jan; 212(1):40-9. PubMed ID: 9541894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Indications for stimulus 3 and 5 in automatic perimetry. Preliminary results].
Zulauf M; Caprioli J
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1994 May; 204(5):407-8. PubMed ID: 8051884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Measuring retinal nerve fiber density with laser polarimetry in patients with AIDS in comparison with health probands with reference to computer perimetry findings. A pilot study using the nerve fiber analyzer].
Thierfelder S; Gramer E; Serguhn S
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1995 Mar; 206(3):165-9. PubMed ID: 7616725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Automatic static quantitative perimetry of the central 30 degrees visual field in normal subjects].
Huang YF
Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 1989 Mar; 25(2):90-3. PubMed ID: 2507260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Perimetry with normal Octopus technique and Weber 'dynamic' technique. Initial results with reference to reproducibility of measurements in glaucoma patients].
Zulauf M; Fehlmann P; Flammer J
Ophthalmologe; 1996 Aug; 93(4):420-7. PubMed ID: 8963141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Fundus-controlled microperimetry with the scanning laser ophthalmoscope in macular diseases].
Schneider U; Kuck H; Inhoffen W; Kreissig I
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1993 Sep; 203(3):212-8. PubMed ID: 8264213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Visual acuity perimetry. Detection of glaucomatous visual field defects].
Reiser EM; Lachenmayr BJ; Vivell PM
Ophthalmologe; 1992 Dec; 89(6):472-6. PubMed ID: 1486263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Variability of findings in light sense and ring perimetry].
Littan T; Meyer JH; Funk J
Ophthalmologe; 1996 Aug; 93(4):413-9. PubMed ID: 8963140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Changes in the visual field in diabetic retinopathy after grid laser coagulation of the posterior pole of the eye].
Ludwig K; Lachenmayr BJ; Bonnici M; Plachta O
Fortschr Ophthalmol; 1991; 88(6):824-8. PubMed ID: 1794813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Automated flicker perimetry].
Lachenmayr B; Gleissner M; Rothbächer H
Fortschr Ophthalmol; 1989; 86(6):695-701. PubMed ID: 2625301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Short-wavelength sensitive visual field loss in patients with clinically significant diabetic macular oedema.
Hudson C; Flanagan JG; Turner GS; Chen HC; Young LB; McLeod D
Diabetologia; 1998 Aug; 41(8):918-28. PubMed ID: 9726594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fundus perimetry with the Micro Perimeter 1 in normal individuals: comparison with conventional threshold perimetry.
Springer C; Bültmann S; Völcker HE; Rohrschneider K
Ophthalmology; 2005 May; 112(5):848-54. PubMed ID: 15878065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Effect of artificial media opacities on Frisén ring perimetry and conventional light sense perimetry. A comparative study].
Meyer JH; Funk J
Ophthalmologe; 1994 Apr; 91(2):156-9. PubMed ID: 8012128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Application of automated perimetry in diagnosis of macular diseases].
Sobolewski P; Słomska J; Pieńkowska-Machoy E; Janecki J; Sabasiński K
Klin Oczna; 1999; 101(4):255-9. PubMed ID: 10581891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Relation between relative afferent pupillary defect and suprathreshold automated perimetry].
Wilhelm H; Meilinger S; Apfelstedt E
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1997 Jun; 210(6):365-9. PubMed ID: 9333662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Diagnosis of retinal diseases. Comparison between multifocal ERG and fundus perimetry - a case study].
Rohrschneider K; Bültmann S; Kiel R; Weimer P; Krastel H; Blankenagel A
Ophthalmologe; 2002 Sep; 99(9):695-702. PubMed ID: 12219258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
