These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1762351)
1. [Automatic perimetry of the central visual field in diseases of the macula]. Janknecht P; Soriano JM; Funk J; Hansen LL Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1991 Oct; 199(4):259-63. PubMed ID: 1762351 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Assessment of the macula function by static perimetry, microperimetry and rarebit perimetry in patients suffering from dry age related macular degeneration]. Nowomiejska K; Oleszczuk A; Zubilewicz A; Krukowski J; Mańkowska A; Rejdak R; Zagórski Z Klin Oczna; 2007; 109(4-6):131-4. PubMed ID: 17725269 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Kinetic fundus controlled perimetry with the scanning laser ophthalmoscope]. Rohrschneider K; Becker M; Fendrich T; Völcker HE Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1995 Aug; 207(2):102-10. PubMed ID: 7474772 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Reduction of retinal light sensitivity in diabetic patients]. Pahor D Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2003 Dec; 220(12):868-72. PubMed ID: 14704945 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Objective assessment of visual field defects using multifocal electroretinography]. Kretschmann U; Gendo K; Wilhelm H; Schiefer U; Hettesheimer H; Zrenner E Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1998 Jan; 212(1):40-9. PubMed ID: 9541894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Indications for stimulus 3 and 5 in automatic perimetry. Preliminary results]. Zulauf M; Caprioli J Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1994 May; 204(5):407-8. PubMed ID: 8051884 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Measuring retinal nerve fiber density with laser polarimetry in patients with AIDS in comparison with health probands with reference to computer perimetry findings. A pilot study using the nerve fiber analyzer]. Thierfelder S; Gramer E; Serguhn S Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1995 Mar; 206(3):165-9. PubMed ID: 7616725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Automatic static quantitative perimetry of the central 30 degrees visual field in normal subjects]. Huang YF Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 1989 Mar; 25(2):90-3. PubMed ID: 2507260 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Perimetry with normal Octopus technique and Weber 'dynamic' technique. Initial results with reference to reproducibility of measurements in glaucoma patients]. Zulauf M; Fehlmann P; Flammer J Ophthalmologe; 1996 Aug; 93(4):420-7. PubMed ID: 8963141 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Fundus-controlled microperimetry with the scanning laser ophthalmoscope in macular diseases]. Schneider U; Kuck H; Inhoffen W; Kreissig I Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1993 Sep; 203(3):212-8. PubMed ID: 8264213 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Variability of findings in light sense and ring perimetry]. Littan T; Meyer JH; Funk J Ophthalmologe; 1996 Aug; 93(4):413-9. PubMed ID: 8963140 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Changes in the visual field in diabetic retinopathy after grid laser coagulation of the posterior pole of the eye]. Ludwig K; Lachenmayr BJ; Bonnici M; Plachta O Fortschr Ophthalmol; 1991; 88(6):824-8. PubMed ID: 1794813 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Short-wavelength sensitive visual field loss in patients with clinically significant diabetic macular oedema. Hudson C; Flanagan JG; Turner GS; Chen HC; Young LB; McLeod D Diabetologia; 1998 Aug; 41(8):918-28. PubMed ID: 9726594 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fundus perimetry with the Micro Perimeter 1 in normal individuals: comparison with conventional threshold perimetry. Springer C; Bültmann S; Völcker HE; Rohrschneider K Ophthalmology; 2005 May; 112(5):848-54. PubMed ID: 15878065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Effect of artificial media opacities on Frisén ring perimetry and conventional light sense perimetry. A comparative study]. Meyer JH; Funk J Ophthalmologe; 1994 Apr; 91(2):156-9. PubMed ID: 8012128 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Application of automated perimetry in diagnosis of macular diseases]. Sobolewski P; Słomska J; Pieńkowska-Machoy E; Janecki J; Sabasiński K Klin Oczna; 1999; 101(4):255-9. PubMed ID: 10581891 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Relation between relative afferent pupillary defect and suprathreshold automated perimetry]. Wilhelm H; Meilinger S; Apfelstedt E Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1997 Jun; 210(6):365-9. PubMed ID: 9333662 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Diagnosis of retinal diseases. Comparison between multifocal ERG and fundus perimetry - a case study]. Rohrschneider K; Bültmann S; Kiel R; Weimer P; Krastel H; Blankenagel A Ophthalmologe; 2002 Sep; 99(9):695-702. PubMed ID: 12219258 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]