124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17623604)
1. On the outcome of computer-assisted total knee replacement.
Decking R; Markmann Y; Mattes T; Puhl W; Scharf HP
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2007 Jun; 74(3):171-4. PubMed ID: 17623604
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mechanical accuracy of navigated minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty (MIS TKA).
Biasca N; Wirth S; Bungartz M
Knee; 2009 Jan; 16(1):22-9. PubMed ID: 19070495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Functional results of navigated minimally invasive and conventional total knee arthroplasty: a comparison in bilateral cases.
Song EK; Seon JK; Yoon TR; Park SJ; Bae BH; Cho SG
Orthopedics; 2006 Oct; 29(10 Suppl):S145-7. PubMed ID: 17407943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Navigation-assisted less invasive total knee arthroplasty compared with conventional total knee arthroplasty: a randomized prospective trial.
Seon JK; Song EK
J Arthroplasty; 2006 Sep; 21(6):777-82. PubMed ID: 16950026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Navigated shorter incision or smaller implant in knee arthritis?
Confalonieri N; Manzotti A; Pullen C
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2007 Oct; 463():63-7. PubMed ID: 17589366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative study of stability after total knee arthroplasties between navigation system and conventional techniques.
Song EK; Seon JK; Yoon TR; Park SJ; Cho SG; Yim JH
J Arthroplasty; 2007 Dec; 22(8):1107-11. PubMed ID: 18078877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative study between computer assisted-navigation and conventional technique in minimally invasive surgery total knee arthroplasty, prospective control study.
Chotanaphuti T; Ongnamthip P; Teeraleekul K; Kraturerk C
J Med Assoc Thai; 2008 Sep; 91(9):1382-8. PubMed ID: 18843868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Imageless navigation for TKA increases implantation accuracy.
Martin A; Wohlgenannt O; Prenn M; Oelsch C; von Strempel A
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2007 Jul; 460():178-84. PubMed ID: 17620811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Computer navigation versus conventional total knee replacement: no difference in functional results at two years.
Spencer JM; Chauhan SK; Sloan K; Taylor A; Beaver RJ
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2007 Apr; 89(4):477-80. PubMed ID: 17463115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Computer-assisted implantation of a total knee arthroplasty: a case-controlled study in comparison with classical instrumentation].
Jenny JY; Boeri C
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2001 Nov; 87(7):645-52. PubMed ID: 11845067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Medin modular implant for total knee arthroplasty--mid-term results].
VavrÃk P; Landor I; Tomaides J; Popelka S
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Feb; 76(1):30-4. PubMed ID: 19268046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Computer-assisted surgery in total knee replacement. Preliminary results: report of 60 cases].
El Masri F; Rammal H; Ghanem I; El Hage S; El Abiad R; Kharrat K; Dagher F
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2008 May; 94(3):261-7. PubMed ID: 18456061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Computer navigation vs conventional total knee arthroplasty: five-year functional results of a prospective randomized trial.
Harvie P; Sloan K; Beaver RJ
J Arthroplasty; 2012 May; 27(5):667-72.e1. PubMed ID: 21958937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A prospective randomized trial on the role of perioperative celecoxib administration for total knee arthroplasty: improving clinical outcomes.
Reuben SS; Buvenandran A; Katz B; Kroin JS
Anesth Analg; 2008 Apr; 106(4):1258-64, table of contents. PubMed ID: 18349203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Experience with computer-assisted navigation for total knee arthroplasty in a community setting.
Carter RE; Rush PF; Smid JA; Smith WL
J Arthroplasty; 2008 Aug; 23(5):707-13. PubMed ID: 18534523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Computer assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty: improved coronal alignment.
Kim SJ; MacDonald M; Hernandez J; Wixson RL
J Arthroplasty; 2005 Oct; 20(7 Suppl 3):123-31. PubMed ID: 16214013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Total knee arthroplasty for severe haemophilic arthropathy: long-term experience in Taiwan.
Chiang CC; Chen PQ; Shen MC; Tsai W
Haemophilia; 2008 Jul; 14(4):828-34. PubMed ID: 18510565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Little clinical advantage of computer-assisted navigation over conventional instrumentation in primary total knee arthroplasty at early follow-up.
Cheng T; Pan XY; Mao X; Zhang GY; Zhang XL
Knee; 2012 Aug; 19(4):237-45. PubMed ID: 22130355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A prospective study comparing the functional outcome of computer-assisted and conventional total knee replacement.
Hoffart HE; Langenstein E; Vasak N
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2012 Feb; 94(2):194-9. PubMed ID: 22323685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Minimal invasive and computer-assisted total knee replacement compared with the minimal invasive technique: a prospective, randomized trial with short-term outcomes.
Zhang Z; Gu B; Zhu W; Zhu L; Li Q; Du Y
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg; 2014 Jan; 134(1):65-71. PubMed ID: 24202408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
