These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
5. Co-option of male courtship signals from aggressive display in bowerbirds. Borgia G; Coleman SW Proc Biol Sci; 2000 Sep; 267(1454):1735-40. PubMed ID: 12233770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Male satin bowerbirds (Ptilonorhynchus violaceus) compensate for sexual signal loss by enhancing multiple display features. Bravery BD; Goldizen AW Naturwissenschaften; 2007 Jun; 94(6):473-6. PubMed ID: 17216428 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Multiple male traits interact: attractive bower decorations facilitate attractive behavioural displays in satin bowerbirds. Patricelli GL; Uy JA; Borgia G Proc Biol Sci; 2003 Nov; 270(1531):2389-95. PubMed ID: 14667356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Imitating the neighbours: vocal dialect matching in a mimic-model system. Putland DA; Nicholls JA; Noad MJ; Goldizen AW Biol Lett; 2006 Sep; 2(3):367-70. PubMed ID: 17148405 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Genetic population structure and call variation in a passerine bird, the satin bowerbird, Ptilonorhynchus violaceus. Nicholls JA; Austin JJ; Moritz C; Goldizen AW Evolution; 2006 Jun; 60(6):1279-90. PubMed ID: 16892977 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The mimetic repertoire of the spotted bowerbird Ptilonorhynchus maculatus. Kelley LA; Healy SD Naturwissenschaften; 2011 Jun; 98(6):501-7. PubMed ID: 21494871 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Vocal mimicry in male bowerbirds: who learns from whom? Kelley LA; Healy SD Biol Lett; 2010 Oct; 6(5):626-9. PubMed ID: 20236967 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Male displays adjusted to female's response. Patricelli GL; Uy JA; Walsh G; Borgia G Nature; 2002 Jan; 415(6869):279-80. PubMed ID: 11796996 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mating vocalizations of female frogs: control and evolutionary mechanisms. Emerson SB; Boyd SK Brain Behav Evol; 1999; 53(4):187-97. PubMed ID: 10343085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Coos, booms, and hoots: The evolution of closed-mouth vocal behavior in birds. Riede T; Eliason CM; Miller EH; Goller F; Clarke JA Evolution; 2016 Aug; 70(8):1734-46. PubMed ID: 27345722 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Spectrographic analyses reveal signals of individuality and kinship in the ultrasonic courtship vocalizations of wild house mice. Hoffmann F; Musolf K; Penn DJ Physiol Behav; 2012 Feb; 105(3):766-71. PubMed ID: 22037196 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The cost of display in the non-resource-based mating system of the satin bowerbird. Borgia G Am Nat; 1993 May; 141(5):729-43. PubMed ID: 19426007 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Displays of the honeyeater Manorina melanocephala. Dow DD Z Tierpsychol; 1975 Aug; 38(1):70-96. PubMed ID: 1237204 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The evolution of vocal learning. Nowicki S; Searcy WA Curr Opin Neurobiol; 2014 Oct; 28():48-53. PubMed ID: 25033109 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Why do Calypte hummingbirds "sing" with both their tail and their syrinx? An apparent example of sexual sensory bias. Clark CJ; Feo TJ Am Nat; 2010 Jan; 175(1):27-37. PubMed ID: 19916787 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]